Arema vs Malut United: match statistics
Arema vs Malut United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arema played Malut United in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Arema: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Malut United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arema scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Malut United scores 2.04 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arema 72%, Malut United 64%. Over 2.5: Arema 64%, Malut United 64%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Malut United has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.44. Arema: 11.9 shots per match, Malut United: 13.8.
Match halves
Arema: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.00. Malut United: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.16.
Goals by minute
Arema: 76-90+ (12 goals). Malut United: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Malut United is the favorite in this match, as they have 13 wins and 51 goals this season compared to Arema’s 8 wins and 36 goals (a 15-goal difference). In their last 5 matches Malut scored 13 goals and averages 1.6 points per game, while Arema scored 10 goals and averages only 0.8 points per game, indicating better form and productivity from the visitors. Defensively Malut concedes 1.08 goals on the road on average, while Arema concedes 1.58 at home; although Arema has a higher home xG (1.52 vs 1.35) and more shots on target (4.83 vs 3.75), actual goal return and points balance favor Malut. Arema records 52% possession and averages 1.75 goals at their stadium, while the high average total goals in home matches (3.33) suggests an open game in which the more efficient visitors have the edge. Therefore I tip an away win and assess probabilities as follows: Malut 55%, draw 20%, Arema 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a clear signal for BTTS: seasonal rates are 62% for Arema and 67% for Malut United, and in the last 5 matches both sides had 80% of games with goals from both teams. Offensively Arema averages 2.62 goals per match with xG 1.78 and 6.85 shots on target, while Malut has a seasonal 1.42 goals and xG 1.35, and in the last 5 matches scored 13 goals (2.6 per match), demonstrating a real scoring capability. Defenses are vulnerable — Arema concedes 1.46 goals seasonally and 2.2 in the last 5 matches, Malut concedes 1.08 seasonally and 1.8 in the last 5, with clean sheets occurring in only 31% and 25% of cases, so a clean sheet is unlikely. Additionally xG-for Arema 1.78 versus xG-against Malut 1.62, and shot conversion 16% (Arema) vs 13% (Malut) increase the chances of goals from both sides. Based on this I tip BTTS - Yes at 80% and No at 20%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project Arema to score about 1.70 goals and Malut United about 1.21 goals, totaling approximately 2.91 goals. This estimate is based on xG: Arema has xG 1.78 and xG against Malut 1.62 (average 1.70), Malut has xG 1.35 and xG against Arema 1.06 (average 1.21). Seasonally Arema scores 2.62 goals at home on average and has 92% of matches over 1.5, Malut scores 1.42 away with 75% of matches over 1.5, therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 93%. For the 2.5 line there are strong signals: Arema has 69% of season matches over 2.5, Malut 58%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams had 100% of matches over 2.5, so I assign Over 2.5 at 72%. Additionally Arema averages 6.85 shots on target versus Malut’s 3.75 and has a higher shot conversion 16% vs 13%, which increases the probability of extra goals for the home side. The 3.5 line is riskier: Arema at home has 62% of matches over 3.5, Malut away 25%, and the combined xG 2.91 favors Under 3.5 (I estimate Under 59%), therefore the best pick is Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Season-long numbers favor the home side: Arema averages 2.62 goals versus Malut United’s 1.42, has a higher xG (1.78 vs 1.35) and more shots on target (6.85 vs 3.75), indicating Arema’s offensive advantage. At half-time Arema averages 1.08 goals scored and 0.54 conceded, while Malut records 0.67 scored and 0.42 conceded, so a home lead at the break is a credible scenario. After the break Arema scores 1.54 goals on average versus Malut’s 0.75 and has 9 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to just 1 by their opponents, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will hold or extend their lead. However, one must account for Arema’s poorer form in the last 5 matches (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses – 20% wins) compared to Malut’s form (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss – 40% wins), and the fact both teams have scored in 62% (Arema) and 67% (Malut) of games, which introduces the risk of an away goal. As a result, the strongest signal is Arema leading at half-time and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arema | Malut United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Malut United is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Arema · 1.6 pts / match - Malut United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Malut United is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Arema · 2.04 goals / match - Malut United
Malut United is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Arema · 1.28 goals / match - Malut United
Arema scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Malut United keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
Malut United scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arema
Over / Under - Malut United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Malut United is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / match - Arema · 1.8 pts / match - Malut United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Malut United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arema
Malut United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Arema | Liga | Malut United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 55% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 26% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 70% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 83% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 1 - 0 Malut United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arema vs Malut United?
The Liga 1 match finished Arema 1:1 Malut United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Malut United?
Arema score 1.44 goals per game on average and Malut United 2.04. The Liga 1 average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Arema's matches and 64% of Malut United's.
What form are Arema and Malut United in?
Over the last 5 games Arema have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Malut United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Malut United?
The statistical background for Arema vs Malut United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


