Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 28 July 2026

Arema vs Persijap: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Persijap crest
Persijap
165%(1.83)
X20%(3.30)
215%(4.01)

Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.

Arema vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema play Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 2 February 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Persijap: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Persijap scores 0.91 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 65%, Persijap 41%. Over 2.5: Arema 62%, Persijap 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.37. Arema: 12.2 shots per match, Persijap: 11.3.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. Persijap: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). Persijap: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AremaPersijap
8Shots7
AremaPersijap
4Shots on target2
AremaPersijap
1.19xG1.07
AremaPersijap
4Corners5
AremaPersijap
55Dangerous attacks66
AremaPersijap
18Fouls12
AremaPersijap
4Cards2
AremaPersijap

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match0.91
AremaPersijap
1.38Goals conceded / match1.32
AremaPersijap
48%Average possession47%
AremaPersijap
4.44Shots on target / match4.09
AremaPersijap

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match11.26
AremaPersijap
4.44Shots on target4.09
AremaPersijap
12.8%Shot conversion8.1%
AremaPersijap
48%Possession47%
AremaPersijap
1.46xG for1.37
AremaPersijap
1.57xG against1.46
AremaPersijap

Shooting quality

Arema: BalancedPersijap: Balanced
AremaPersijap
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Arema · 1 pts / match - Persijap

Arema
LLWWW
Season result split
38% W26% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Persijap
LLWDD
Season result split
26% W26% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-16
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Arema · 0.91 goals / match - Persijap

Persijap is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Arema · 1.32 goals / match - Persijap

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 matches).

Persijap scoring profile: strong

Persijap scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

53Goals scored (season)31
AremaPersijap
47Goals conceded (season)45
AremaPersijap
2.94Average goals in match2.24
AremaPersijap
13Goals scored (last 5)3
AremaPersijap
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
AremaPersijap

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal56%
AremaPersijap
47%2 goals29%
AremaPersijap
18%3 goals6%
AremaPersijap
6%4 goals0%
AremaPersijap

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal68%
AremaPersijap
41%2 goals44%
AremaPersijap
15%3 goals15%
AremaPersijap
6%4 goals6%
AremaPersijap

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
AremaPersijap
3%BTTS in both halves3%
AremaPersijap
24%Scored in both halves18%
AremaPersijap

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
AremaPersijap
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
AremaPersijap
60%BTTS - last 50%
AremaPersijap

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
AremaPersijap
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
AremaPersijap
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
AremaPersijap

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
AremaPersijap
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
AremaPersijap
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
AremaPersijap

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Arema · 1.09 pts / match - Persijap

Arema - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing
Persijap - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.09
AremaPersijap
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.38
AremaPersijap
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
AremaPersijap
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.94
AremaPersijap
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
AremaPersijap
56%No goal before half-time68%
AremaPersijap

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.15
AremaPersijap
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
AremaPersijap
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
AremaPersijap
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.29
AremaPersijap
47%Clean sheet after half-time41%
AremaPersijap
38%No goal after half-time59%
AremaPersijap

Arema - second-half results

50% W24% R26% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persijap - second-half results

26% W35% R38% P
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Persijap - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Persijap
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
2
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
2
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
7
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Persijap

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPersijap
Average goals in match 2.942.80 2.24
Both teams scored 65%52% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 47%
Clean sheets 24%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 1 - 0 Persijap. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Persijap
0 : 0
Arema

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Persijap?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 1:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persijap?

Arema score 1.56 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.91. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Arema's matches and 41% of Persijap's.

What form are Arema and Persijap in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Persijap 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persijap?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Arema vs Persijap: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.