Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 12 September 2026

Arema vs Persijap: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Persijap crest
Persijap
165%(1.83)
X20%(3.30)
215%(4.01)

Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.

Arema vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema played Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 2 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Arema: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persijap: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 1.28 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Persijap scores 0.89 and concedes 1.83. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 78%, Persijap 61%. Over 2.5: Arema 61%, Persijap 61%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Persijap has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.44. Arema: 11.8 shots per match, Persijap: 12.4.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.83. Persijap: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Arema: 76-90+ (8 goals). Persijap: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AremaPersijap
8Shots7
AremaPersijap
4Shots on target2
AremaPersijap
1.19xG1.07
AremaPersijap
4Corners5
AremaPersijap
55Dangerous attacks66
AremaPersijap
18Fouls12
AremaPersijap
4Cards2
AremaPersijap

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.28Goals scored / match0.89
AremaPersijap
1.39Goals conceded / match1.83
AremaPersijap
49%Average possession46%
AremaPersijap
4.28Shots on target / match4.61
AremaPersijap

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.83Shots per match12.39
AremaPersijap
4.28Shots on target4.61
AremaPersijap
10.8%Shot conversion7.2%
AremaPersijap
49%Possession46%
AremaPersijap
1.44xG for1.49
AremaPersijap
1.55xG against1.5
AremaPersijap

Shooting quality

Arema: BalancedPersijap: Balanced
AremaPersijap
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema
DLLWL
Season result split
28% W33% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-7
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Persijap
DLLLW
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-12
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.28 goals / match - Arema · 0.89 goals / match - Persijap

Arema is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Arema · 1.83 goals / match - Persijap

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Persijap scoring profile: very strong

Persijap scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).

23Goals scored (season)16
AremaPersijap
25Goals conceded (season)33
AremaPersijap
2.67Average goals in match2.72
AremaPersijap
4Goals scored (last 5)3
AremaPersijap
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
AremaPersijap

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal67%
AremaPersijap
39%2 goals22%
AremaPersijap
6%3 goals0%
AremaPersijap
6%4 goals0%
AremaPersijap

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal89%
AremaPersijap
39%2 goals67%
AremaPersijap
6%3 goals22%
AremaPersijap
0%4 goals6%
AremaPersijap

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time17%
AremaPersijap
6%BTTS in both halves6%
AremaPersijap
17%Scored in both halves11%
AremaPersijap

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AremaPersijap
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AremaPersijap
40%BTTS - last 520%
AremaPersijap

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
AremaPersijap
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AremaPersijap
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AremaPersijap

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
AremaPersijap
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
AremaPersijap
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AremaPersijap

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Arema · 0.78 pts / match - Persijap

Arema - half-time state
28% leading39% draw33% trailing
Persijap - half-time state
11% leading44% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)0.78
AremaPersijap
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.28
AremaPersijap
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
AremaPersijap
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.06
AremaPersijap
56%Clean sheet before half-time39%
AremaPersijap
61%No goal before half-time72%
AremaPersijap

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)0.94
AremaPersijap
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
AremaPersijap
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
AremaPersijap
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.67
AremaPersijap
28%Clean sheet after half-time17%
AremaPersijap
44%No goal after half-time50%
AremaPersijap

Arema - second-half results

33% W28% D39% L
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persijap - second-half results

22% W28% D50% L
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Persijap - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
2
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Persijap
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Persijap

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPersijap
Average goals in match 2.672.59 2.72
Both teams scored 78%53% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%49% 61%
Clean sheets 6%26% 11%
Goal before half-time 72%68% 72%
Goal after half-time 89%83% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PersijapSubstitutionOn: Firman RamadhanOff: Muhammad Buyung Ismu Lessy
  2. AremaYellow cardIlham Rio Fahmi
  3. PersijapSubstitutionOn: Abrizal UmanailoOff: Rendi Saepul
  4. PersijapSubstitutionOn: Sudi AbdallahOff: Alexis Gómez
  5. PersijapYellow cardAly Ndom
  6. PersijapYellow cardIker Guarrotxena Vallejo
  7. AremaYellow cardJayus Hariono

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 1 - 0 Persijap. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Persijap
0 : 0
Arema

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Persijap?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 1:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persijap?

Arema score 1.28 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.89. The Liga 1 average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Arema's matches and 61% of Persijap's.

What form are Arema and Persijap in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persijap 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persijap?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Arema vs Persijap: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.