Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Arema vs Persik Kediri: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Persik Kediri crest
Persik Kediri
150%(2.21)
X30%(3.23)
220%(2.99)

Despite a dip in form over the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), Arema displays superior offensive statistics at home, averaging 1.5 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.45. Persik Kediri performs significantly worse on the road, scoring just 0.89 goals on average with an xG of 1.19, while conceding 1.78 goals per match. The visitors' form is alarming—in their last five fixtures, they have recorded only 1 draw and 4 losses, conceding 11 goals. Although Arema holds a negative home record this season (25% win rate, 63% loss rate), their advantage in possession (53%) and superior efficiency (13% shot conversion rate) against a visiting side with a porous defense gives them a solid chance of victory. Considering all factors, the hosts are the favorites for this encounter.

Arema vs Persik Kediri: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema play Persik Kediri in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 11 January 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Persik Kediri: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Persik Kediri scores 1.24 and concedes 1.79. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 65%, Persik Kediri 68%. Over 2.5: Arema 62%, Persik Kediri 71%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.42. Arema: 12.2 shots per match, Persik Kediri: 10.9.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. Persik Kediri: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). Persik Kediri: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Despite a dip in form over the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), Arema displays superior offensive statistics at home, averaging 1.5 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.45. Persik Kediri performs significantly worse on the road, scoring just 0.89 goals on average with an xG of 1.19, while conceding 1.78 goals per match. The visitors' form is alarming—in their last five fixtures, they have recorded only 1 draw and 4 losses, conceding 11 goals. Although Arema holds a negative home record this season (25% win rate, 63% loss rate), their advantage in possession (53%) and superior efficiency (13% shot conversion rate) against a visiting side with a porous defense gives them a solid chance of victory. Considering all factors, the hosts are the favorites for this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
AremaPersik Kediri
16Shots6
AremaPersik Kediri
5Shots on target3
AremaPersik Kediri
1.82xG1.08
AremaPersik Kediri
6Corners4
AremaPersik Kediri
65Dangerous attacks66
AremaPersik Kediri
8Fouls8
AremaPersik Kediri
0Cards3
AremaPersik Kediri

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AremaPersik Kediri
1.56Goals scored / match1.24
AremaPersik Kediri
1.38Goals conceded / match1.79
AremaPersik Kediri
48%Average possession55%
AremaPersik Kediri
4.44Shots on target / match4.18
AremaPersik Kediri

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match10.91
AremaPersik Kediri
4.44Shots on target4.18
AremaPersik Kediri
12.8%Shot conversion11.3%
AremaPersik Kediri
48%Possession55%
AremaPersik Kediri
1.46xG for1.42
AremaPersik Kediri
1.57xG against1.48
AremaPersik Kediri

Shooting quality

Arema: BalancedPersik Kediri: Balanced
AremaPersik Kediri
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Arema · 1.2 pts / match - Persik Kediri

Arema
LLWWW
Season result split
38% W26% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Persik Kediri
LWWLL
Season result split
32% W18% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-17
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-13
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Arema · 1.24 goals / match - Persik Kediri

Arema is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Arema · 1.79 goals / match - Persik Kediri

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

Persik Kediri scoring profile: very strong

Persik Kediri scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

53Goals scored (season)42
AremaPersik Kediri
47Goals conceded (season)61
AremaPersik Kediri
2.94Average goals in match3.03
AremaPersik Kediri
13Goals scored (last 5)7
AremaPersik Kediri
10Goals conceded (last 5)11
AremaPersik Kediri

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal76%
AremaPersik Kediri
47%2 goals35%
AremaPersik Kediri
18%3 goals12%
AremaPersik Kediri
6%4 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal88%
AremaPersik Kediri
41%2 goals53%
AremaPersik Kediri
15%3 goals26%
AremaPersik Kediri
6%4 goals9%
AremaPersik Kediri

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
AremaPersik Kediri
3%BTTS in both halves6%
AremaPersik Kediri
24%Scored in both halves12%
AremaPersik Kediri

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
AremaPersik Kediri
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
AremaPersik Kediri
60%BTTS - last 540%
AremaPersik Kediri

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
AremaPersik Kediri
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
AremaPersik Kediri
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
AremaPersik Kediri

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
AremaPersik Kediri
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
AremaPersik Kediri
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
AremaPersik Kediri

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Arema · 1.32 pts / match - Persik Kediri

Arema - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing
Persik Kediri - half-time state
29% leading44% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.32
AremaPersik Kediri
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.65
AremaPersik Kediri
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
AremaPersik Kediri
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.21
AremaPersik Kediri
59%Clean sheet before half-time62%
AremaPersik Kediri
56%No goal before half-time59%
AremaPersik Kediri

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)0.71
AremaPersik Kediri
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
AremaPersik Kediri
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)1.24
AremaPersik Kediri
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.82
AremaPersik Kediri
47%Clean sheet after half-time15%
AremaPersik Kediri
38%No goal after half-time53%
AremaPersik Kediri

Arema - second-half results

50% W24% R26% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persik Kediri - second-half results

12% W35% R53% P
45
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Persik Kediri - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Persik Kediri
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
6
16-30
10
9
31-45
5
12
46-60
6
14
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.99
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Persik Kediri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPersik Kediri
Average goals in match 2.942.80 3.03
Both teams scored 65%52% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 71%
Clean sheets 24%27% 12%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 0 - 1 Persik Kediri. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Persik Kediri?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 2:1 Persik Kediri. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persik Kediri?

Arema score 1.56 goals per game on average and Persik Kediri 1.24. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Arema's matches and 68% of Persik Kediri's.

What form are Arema and Persik Kediri in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Persik Kediri 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persik Kediri?

The statistical background for Arema vs Persik Kediri — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.