Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Arema vs Persis Solo: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Persis Solo crest
Persis Solo

Arema vs Persis Solo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema play Persis Solo in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 10:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Persis Solo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Persis Solo scores 1.15 and concedes 1.74. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 65%, Persis Solo 59%. Over 2.5: Arema 62%, Persis Solo 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.38. Arema: 12.2 shots per match, Persis Solo: 11.5.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. Persis Solo: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). Persis Solo: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Arema has a clear advantage in offensive metrics: at home they average 1.69 goals per game versus Persis’s 0.85 on the road, have higher xG (1.50 vs 1.08) and more shots on target (4.54 vs 2.92), indicating better quality scoring opportunities. However, the hosts’ current form is weak — just 1 win in the last 5 matches, 0.8 points per game and only 7 scored and 10 conceded in that span, which increases the risk of an inconsistent performance. Persis are on a good run (last 5: 3 wins and 2 draws, 2.2 points per game) and scored 8 while conceding only 3 in those five fixtures, but they average only 0.85 goals away and fail to score in 46% of their matches. Defensively both teams concede an average of 1.54 goals per game, yet Persis have a higher xG against (1.66) versus 1.34 for Arema, suggesting Persis more frequently allow clear chances. Considering the superior quality of the hosts’ chances (1.69 vs 0.85) and Persis’s high share of goalless games, I favor an Arema win, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
AremaPersis Solo
10Shots11
AremaPersis Solo
3Shots on target0
AremaPersis Solo
1.24xG1.13
AremaPersis Solo
3Corners5
AremaPersis Solo
55Dangerous attacks59
AremaPersis Solo
9Fouls9
AremaPersis Solo
1Cards1
AremaPersis Solo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.15
AremaPersis Solo
1.38Goals conceded / match1.74
AremaPersis Solo
48%Average possession48%
AremaPersis Solo
4.44Shots on target / match3.97
AremaPersis Solo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match11.47
AremaPersis Solo
4.44Shots on target3.97
AremaPersis Solo
12.8%Shot conversion10%
AremaPersis Solo
48%Possession48%
AremaPersis Solo
1.46xG for1.38
AremaPersis Solo
1.57xG against1.7
AremaPersis Solo

Shooting quality

Arema: BalancedPersis Solo: Balanced
AremaPersis Solo
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Arema · 1.4 pts / match - Persis Solo

Arema
LLWWW
Season result split
38% W26% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Persis Solo
LLDWW
Season result split
24% W29% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Arema · 1.15 goals / match - Persis Solo

Arema is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Arema · 1.74 goals / match - Persis Solo

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Persis Solo keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Persis Solo scoring profile: strong

Persis Solo scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

53Goals scored (season)39
AremaPersis Solo
47Goals conceded (season)59
AremaPersis Solo
2.94Average goals in match2.88
AremaPersis Solo
13Goals scored (last 5)6
AremaPersis Solo
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
AremaPersis Solo

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal65%
AremaPersis Solo
47%2 goals38%
AremaPersis Solo
18%3 goals12%
AremaPersis Solo
6%4 goals0%
AremaPersis Solo

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal82%
AremaPersis Solo
41%2 goals53%
AremaPersis Solo
15%3 goals21%
AremaPersis Solo
6%4 goals12%
AremaPersis Solo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time24%
AremaPersis Solo
3%BTTS in both halves12%
AremaPersis Solo
24%Scored in both halves32%
AremaPersis Solo

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
AremaPersis Solo
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AremaPersis Solo
60%BTTS - last 540%
AremaPersis Solo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
AremaPersis Solo
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
AremaPersis Solo
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
AremaPersis Solo

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
AremaPersis Solo
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
AremaPersis Solo
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
AremaPersis Solo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Arema · 1.09 pts / match - Persis Solo

Arema - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing
Persis Solo - half-time state
24% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.09
AremaPersis Solo
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AremaPersis Solo
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
AremaPersis Solo
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.29
AremaPersis Solo
59%Clean sheet before half-time44%
AremaPersis Solo
56%No goal before half-time56%
AremaPersis Solo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.12
AremaPersis Solo
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
AremaPersis Solo
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
AremaPersis Solo
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.59
AremaPersis Solo
47%Clean sheet after half-time41%
AremaPersis Solo
38%No goal after half-time47%
AremaPersis Solo

Arema - second-half results

50% W24% R26% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persis Solo - second-half results

26% W32% R41% P
37
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Persis Solo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Persis Solo
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
2
9
16-30
10
12
31-45
3
9
46-60
5
9
61-75
14
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Persis Solo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPersis Solo
Average goals in match 2.942.80 2.88
Both teams scored 65%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 62%
Clean sheets 24%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 76%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 1 - 0 Persis Solo. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Persis Solo
2 : 2
Arema

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Persis Solo?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 2:0 Persis Solo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persis Solo?

Arema score 1.56 goals per game on average and Persis Solo 1.15. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Arema's matches and 59% of Persis Solo's.

What form are Arema and Persis Solo in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Persis Solo 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persis Solo?

The statistical background for Arema vs Persis Solo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.