Indonesia - Liga 1Stadion KanjuruhanData current as of 23 July 2026

Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
3 : 1half-time 1:0
PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta

Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema play PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 10:30. Venue: Stadion Kanjuruhan. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 65%, PSIM Yogyakarta 53%. Over 2.5: Arema 62%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.46. Arema: 12.2 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back an Arema win because Arema averages 1.69 goals per home match versus PSIM’s 1.25 on the road; in the last 5 fixtures Arema scored 10 goals compared to PSIM’s 5. Arema is also more efficient in the final third: home shot conversion is 14% vs 10% for PSIM, with a similar number of shots on target (4.5 vs 4.38). At the same time Arema conceded 9 goals in the last 5 matches while PSIM conceded only 4, and their goals conceded per match are 1.5 (Arema) and 1.25 (PSIM), indicating some defensive vulnerability for the hosts. The quality of created chances is balanced — average xG is 1.46 for Arema and 1.48 for PSIM, and both teams average 1.4 points over the last 5 matches, so I expect a tight game. Arema’s key advantage is a low share of home matches without scoring (13% vs 38% for PSIM away), so I give the hosts the higher probability of winning.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
16Shots17
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
6Shots on target5
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.79xG2.06
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
5Corners4
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
50Dangerous attacks87
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
12Fouls6
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
4Cards2
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.56Goals scored / match1.26
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.38Goals conceded / match1.29
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
48%Average possession59%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
4.44Shots on target / match4.41
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match13.18
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
4.44Shots on target4.41
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
12.8%Shot conversion9.6%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
48%Possession59%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.46xG for1.57
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.57xG against1.42
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Arema: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Arema · 1.2 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Arema
LLWWW
Season result split
38% W26% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Arema · 1.26 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

PSIM Yogyakarta is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Arema · 1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

53Goals scored (season)43
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
47Goals conceded (season)44
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
2.94Average goals in match2.56
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
13Goals scored (last 5)5
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal74%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
47%2 goals38%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
18%3 goals12%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
6%4 goals3%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
41%2 goals41%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
15%3 goals15%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
6%4 goals3%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
3%BTTS in both halves6%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
24%Scored in both halves18%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
60%BTTS - last 540%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Arema · 1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Arema - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.18
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.47
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.97
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
56%No goal before half-time65%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.38
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.59
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta
38%No goal after half-time44%
AremaPSIM Yogyakarta

Arema - second-half results

50% W24% R26% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 2.942.80 2.56
Both teams scored 65%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 50%
Clean sheets 24%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arema 0 - 1 - 0 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

PSIM Yogyakarta
1 : 1
Arema

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 3:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Arema score 1.56 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.26. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Arema's matches and 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Arema and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Arema vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.