Arema vs PSM: match statistics
Arema vs PSM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arema play PSM in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 10:30. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. PSM: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. PSM scores 1.15 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arema 65%, PSM 59%. Over 2.5: Arema 62%, PSM 44%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.30. Arema: 12.2 shots per match, PSM: 11.1.
Match halves
Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. PSM: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). PSM: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Arema holds a slight home edge: the hosts score 1.6 goals per home match versus 1.2 goals that PSM average away, with xG at 1.46 for Arema against 1.25 for the visitors. Arema averages 11.87 shots and 4.33 on target per home game, while PSM records 10.2 shots and 3.73 on target; combined with higher possession (51% vs 48%) this translates into superior quality of chances. The visitors, however, show better short-term form: PSM have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.8 points per game in that period, whereas Arema have 5 goals and 1.4 points. Defensively the sides are comparable — Arema concede 1.6 goals at home, PSM concede 1.53 away — but the hosts have a higher clean sheet rate (20% vs 7%) and less frequently finish matches goalless (13% vs 27%). Considering the xG advantage, greater number of shots on target and Arema’s 40% home win rate versus PSM’s 27% away win rate, I give a slight preference to the hosts.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arema | PSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Arema is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Arema · 0.6 pts / match - PSM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Arema · 1.15 goals / match - PSM
Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while PSM keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).
PSM scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Arema
Over / Under — PSM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arema is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Arema · 1.21 pts / match - PSM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PSM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arema
PSM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Arema | Liga | PSM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 52% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 72% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arema 1 - 0 - 0 PSM. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arema vs PSM?
The Liga 1 match finished Arema 3:0 PSM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs PSM?
Arema score 1.56 goals per game on average and PSM 1.15. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Arema's matches and 59% of PSM's.
What form are Arema and PSM in?
Over the last 5 games Arema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PSM 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs PSM?
The statistical background for Arema vs PSM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.