Arezzo vs Pineto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arezzo played Pineto in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 15 December 2025. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Arezzo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Pineto: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arezzo scores 1.94 and concedes 0.69 goals per match. Pineto scores 1.31 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arezzo 44%, Pineto 56%. Over 2.5: Arezzo 50%, Pineto 44%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Arezzo has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.20. Arezzo: 15.3 shots per match, Pineto: 9.6.

Match halves

Arezzo: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.50. Pineto: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Arezzo: 76-90+ (12 goals). Pineto: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

3 : 3
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
ArezzoPineto
27Shots8
ArezzoPineto
14Shots on target6
ArezzoPineto
3.24xG1.13
ArezzoPineto
13Corners2
ArezzoPineto
79Dangerous attacks28
ArezzoPineto
13Fouls11
ArezzoPineto
3Cards3
ArezzoPineto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.94Goals scored / match1.31
ArezzoPineto
0.69Goals conceded / match1.13
ArezzoPineto
53%Average possession48%
ArezzoPineto
5.69Shots on target / match3.38
ArezzoPineto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.31Shots per match9.63
ArezzoPineto
5.69Shots on target3.38
ArezzoPineto
12.7%Shot conversion13.6%
ArezzoPineto
53%Possession48%
ArezzoPineto
1.81xG for1.2
ArezzoPineto
1.08xG against1.37
ArezzoPineto

Shooting quality

Arezzo: AttackingPineto: Efficient finishing
ArezzoPineto
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arezzo is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Arezzo · 1.6 pts / match - Pineto

Arezzo
DWWWL
Season result split
75% W13% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-2-2
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-0-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pineto
WWDLD
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-4
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arezzo is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Arezzo · 1.31 goals / match - Pineto

Arezzo is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.69 goals / match - Arezzo · 1.13 goals / match - Pineto

Arezzo scoring profile: very strong

Arezzo scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Pineto keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

Pineto scoring profile: strong

Pineto scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Arezzo keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)21
ArezzoPineto
11Goals conceded (season)18
ArezzoPineto
2.63Average goals in match2.44
ArezzoPineto
6Goals scored (last 5)5
ArezzoPineto
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
ArezzoPineto

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal88%
ArezzoPineto
50%2 goals31%
ArezzoPineto
38%3 goals13%
ArezzoPineto
13%4 goals0%
ArezzoPineto

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal69%
ArezzoPineto
19%2 goals25%
ArezzoPineto
0%3 goals19%
ArezzoPineto
0%4 goals0%
ArezzoPineto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
ArezzoPineto
0%BTTS in both halves6%
ArezzoPineto
31%Scored in both halves25%
ArezzoPineto

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
ArezzoPineto
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
ArezzoPineto
40%BTTS - last 560%
ArezzoPineto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
ArezzoPineto
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
ArezzoPineto
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
ArezzoPineto

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
ArezzoPineto
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
ArezzoPineto
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
ArezzoPineto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pineto is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Arezzo · 1.69 pts / match - Pineto

Arezzo - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing
Pineto - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.69
ArezzoPineto
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.81
ArezzoPineto
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ArezzoPineto
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.31
ArezzoPineto
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
ArezzoPineto
63%No goal before half-time31%
ArezzoPineto

After half-time (2nd half)

2.38Points per match (2nd half)1.19
ArezzoPineto
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ArezzoPineto
0.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
ArezzoPineto
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.13
ArezzoPineto
81%Clean sheet after half-time44%
ArezzoPineto
19%No goal after half-time56%
ArezzoPineto

Arezzo - second-half results

69% W31% D0% L
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pineto - second-half results

25% W44% D31% L
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arezzo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Pineto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arezzo
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
6
2
61-75
12
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

Pineto
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arezzo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.1
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Pineto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

ArezzoLigaPineto
Average goals in match 2.632.23 2.44
Both teams scored 44%47% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%36% 44%
Clean sheets 50%31% 31%
Goal before half-time 63%57% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PinetoYellow cardAnass Serbouti
  2. ArezzoYellow cardGiacomo Venturi
  3. ArezzoGoalFilippo De Col
  4. ArezzoSubstitutionOn: Matteo ArenaOff: Filippo De Col
  5. ArezzoGoalPietro Cianci
  6. PinetoGoalLuca Schirone
  7. ArezzoYellow cardMatteo Gilli
  8. PinetoSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo GagliardiOff: Anass Serbouti
  9. PinetoYellow cardGianluca Germinario
  10. ArezzoYellow cardShaka Mawuli
  11. ArezzoSubstitutionOn: Mario RavasioOff: Gennaro Iaccarino
  12. PinetoYellow cardFederico Mastropietro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Arezzo vs Pineto?

The Serie C Group B match finished Arezzo 3:3 Pineto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arezzo vs Pineto?

Arezzo score 1.94 goals per game on average and Pineto 1.31. The Serie C Group B average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Arezzo's matches and 56% of Pineto's.

What form are Arezzo and Pineto in?

Over the last 5 games Arezzo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pineto 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arezzo vs Pineto?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.