Aris vs Enosis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aris played Enosis in First Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Aris: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Enosis: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aris scores 2.09 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Enosis scores 0.36 and concedes 2.36. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aris 45%, Enosis 27%. Over 2.5: Aris 64%, Enosis 45%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Aris has higher xG: 1.74 vs 0.77. Aris: 12.7 shots per match, Enosis: 5.5.

Match halves

Aris: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.18. Enosis: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.09.

Goals by minute

Aris: 76-90+ (7 goals). Enosis: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
ArisEnosis
15Shots6
ArisEnosis
6Shots on target4
ArisEnosis
1.81xG0.91
ArisEnosis
5Corners5
ArisEnosis
61Dangerous attacks34
ArisEnosis
10Fouls12
ArisEnosis
1Cards2
ArisEnosis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.09Goals scored / match0.36
ArisEnosis
0.73Goals conceded / match2.36
ArisEnosis
54%Average possession42%
ArisEnosis
5.45Shots on target / match1.91
ArisEnosis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match5.45
ArisEnosis
5.45Shots on target1.91
ArisEnosis
16.4%Shot conversion6.7%
ArisEnosis
54%Possession42%
ArisEnosis
1.74xG for0.77
ArisEnosis
1.01xG against1.64
ArisEnosis

Shooting quality

Aris: Efficient finishingEnosis: Balanced
ArisEnosis
Accuracy (shots on target)43%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Aris
WDWWL
Season result split
64% W18% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-2
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Enosis
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W9% R91% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-10
0.09 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aris is 481% better for: goals scored per match.

2.09 goals / match - Aris · 0.36 goals / match - Enosis

Aris is 223% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Aris · 2.36 goals / match - Enosis

Aris scoring profile: very strong

Aris scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Enosis keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).

Enosis scoring profile: more difficult

Enosis scores in 27% of matches (3 of 11 matches), while Aris keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 matches).

23Goals scored (season)4
ArisEnosis
8Goals conceded (season)26
ArisEnosis
2.82Average goals in match2.73
ArisEnosis
12Goals scored (last 5)3
ArisEnosis
4Goals conceded (last 5)15
ArisEnosis

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal27%
ArisEnosis
64%2 goals9%
ArisEnosis
45%3 goals0%
ArisEnosis
9%4 goals0%
ArisEnosis

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal100%
ArisEnosis
18%2 goals73%
ArisEnosis
9%3 goals45%
ArisEnosis
0%4 goals9%
ArisEnosis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time18%
ArisEnosis
9%BTTS in both halves0%
ArisEnosis
55%Scored in both halves0%
ArisEnosis

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
ArisEnosis
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
ArisEnosis
60%BTTS - last 540%
ArisEnosis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
ArisEnosis
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
ArisEnosis
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
ArisEnosis

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
ArisEnosis
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
ArisEnosis
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
ArisEnosis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aris is 231% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.82 pts / match - Aris · 0.55 pts / match - Enosis

Aris - half-time state
45% leading45% draw9% trailing
Enosis - half-time state
9% leading27% draw64% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)0.55
ArisEnosis
0.91Goals scored (1st half)0.27
ArisEnosis
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
ArisEnosis
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.36
ArisEnosis
64%Clean sheet before half-time27%
ArisEnosis
27%No goal before half-time82%
ArisEnosis

After half-time (2nd half)

2.18Points per match (2nd half)0.27
ArisEnosis
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.09
ArisEnosis
0.27Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
ArisEnosis
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.36
ArisEnosis
73%Clean sheet after half-time18%
ArisEnosis
27%No goal after half-time91%
ArisEnosis

Aris - second-half results

64% W27% R9% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Enosis - second-half results

0% W27% R73% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aris - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Enosis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match1.81.2
Average goals in match2.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-6-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aris
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
0
31-45
5
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Enosis
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
7
31-45
1
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aris

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Enosis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
30%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

ArisLigaEnosis
Average goals in match 2.822.68 2.73
Both teams scored 45%40% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%51% 45%
Clean sheets 55%32% 0%
Goal before half-time 73%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 82%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EnosisSubstitutionOn: Elzio Lohan Alves LucioOff: Ivan Laća
  2. ArisSubstitutionOn: Viktor KovalenkoOff: Veljko Nikolić
  3. EnosisYellow cardSymeon Solomou
  4. ArisSubstitutionOn: Ross McCauslandOff: Jaden Sean Montnor
  5. EnosisYellow cardJames Emmanuel Okeke
  6. ArisSubstitutionOn: Rody Junior EffagheOff: Giorgi Kvilitaia
  7. ArisYellow cardMamadou Sané

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Andreas TechranyMatches officiated: 14
4.79Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins28%Draws36%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Aris vs Enosis?

The First Division match finished Aris 4:0 Enosis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Aris vs Enosis?

Aris score 2.09 goals per game on average and Enosis 0.36. The First Division average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Aris's matches and 27% of Enosis's.

What form are Aris and Enosis in?

Over the last 5 games Aris have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Enosis 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aris vs Enosis?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Aris vs Enosis: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.