Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98: match statistics
Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arminia Bielefeld played Darmstadt 98 in 2. Bundesliga (Germany). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Arminia Bielefeld: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Darmstadt 98: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arminia Bielefeld scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Darmstadt 98 scores 1.81 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arminia Bielefeld 59%, Darmstadt 98 59%. Over 2.5: Arminia Bielefeld 52%, Darmstadt 98 56%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Arminia Bielefeld has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.53. Arminia Bielefeld: 14.3 shots per match, Darmstadt 98: 13.7.
Match halves
Arminia Bielefeld: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.85. Darmstadt 98: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 1.15.
Goals by minute
Arminia Bielefeld: 46-60 (9 goals). Darmstadt 98: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. Bundesliga: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match looks balanced: Arminia at home generates on average xG 1.75, 16.23 shots and 5.15 on target per game, while Darmstadt away posts lower metrics (xG 1.39, 12.62 shots and 4.46 on target). However, the visitors show better form and efficiency this season — Darmstadt have scored 49 goals and netted 9 in the last 5 matches, earning an average of 1.6 points per game, versus Arminia’s 39 goals and 0.8 points per game. Outcome trends favor a draw: Darmstadt draw 54% of away matches, while Arminia win 38% of home games and keep 31% clean sheets. Defensively Arminia concede on average 1.31 goals at home versus Darmstadt’s 1.54 away, but the visitors’ overall seasonal record (30 goals conceded vs Arminia’s 39) indicates greater stability for Darmstadt. Considering Arminia’s advantage in xG and shot volume against the visitors’ better form and propensity to draw, a stalemate is the most likely result; proposed probabilities: home 28%, draw 42%, away 30%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "both teams to score" scenario appears more likely given Darmstadt's seasonal BTTS of 69% and 80% in the last 5 matches, against a league BTTS frequency of 60%. Arminia at home scores an average of 2.07 goals and has xG_for 1.67 with 5.79 shots on target, while Darmstadt away averages 1.54 goals and xG_for 1.39, suggesting both sides can create scoring opportunities. The counterargument is that Arminia concedes only 0.71 goals at home and has kept 50% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches Arminia conceded an average of 1.6 goals and had xG against 1.81, indicating recent defensive decline. Darmstadt has only 23% clean sheets away, scored 49 goals and conceded 30 this season, and averaged 1.8 goals in the last 5 matches, which supports the case that the visitors will find the net. Considering these figures and Darmstadt's BTTS statistical edge and Arminia's recent trends, I assess the probability of BTTS at about 65% (Yes) versus 35% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows: Arminia has an attacking xG of 1.67, while opponents’ xG against Darmstadt is 1.79 — averaging to ~1.73 expected goals for the home side; Darmstadt has attacking xG 1.39 and xG against Arminia 1.44 — ~1.42 for the away side. After weighting these xG figures with season goal averages (Arminia scores 2.07 at home, Darmstadt 1.54) and Arminia’s home defense (concedes 0.71), the final expectation is roughly 1.77 for Arminia and 1.27 for Darmstadt, totaling 3.04 goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.04 yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈81%, Over 2.5 ≈59% and Over 3.5 ≈36%, which aligns with seasonal Over metrics (Arminia Over1.5 79% / Darmstadt Over1.5 77%; Over2.5 50% vs 62%). Additionally, Darmstadt records BTTS in 69% of matches, and average shots on target are 5.79 (Arminia) vs 4.46 (Darmstadt), supporting a scenario with multiple scoring opportunities. Consequently, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (recommended) at approximately 81% probability; Over 2.5 has moderate edge (~59%), while Over 3.5 is less likely (~36%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time win for the home team (X/1) with a probability of 38%. The home side scores an average of 0.86 goals by half-time versus 0.46 for the visitors and were level at the break in 9 matches (64%) while Darmstadt had 7 half-time draws (54%), yielding roughly a 59% chance of a draw at the break. After half-time Arminia clearly dominates: they score on average 1.21 goals and concede only 0.21 after the break, and in 71% of matches they have a positive second-half balance, which favors a turnaround or deciding the result after the break. Additionally, the home xG is 1.67 versus Darmstadt’s conceded xG of 1.79, and average shots on target are 5.79 compared with the visitors’ 4.46; therefore X/1 is the strongest signal, with the 1/1 scenario rated second most likely (27%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arminia Bielefeld | Darmstadt 98 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Darmstadt 98 is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Arminia Bielefeld · 1.6 pts / match - Darmstadt 98
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Darmstadt 98 is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Arminia Bielefeld · 1.81 goals / match - Darmstadt 98
Darmstadt 98 is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Arminia Bielefeld · 1.11 goals / match - Darmstadt 98
Arminia Bielefeld scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Darmstadt 98 keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).
Darmstadt 98 scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Arminia Bielefeld keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arminia Bielefeld
Over / Under - Darmstadt 98
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arminia Bielefeld is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Arminia Bielefeld · 1.15 pts / match - Darmstadt 98
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arminia Bielefeld - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Darmstadt 98 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arminia Bielefeld
Darmstadt 98
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Arminia Bielefeld | Liga | Darmstadt 98 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.89 | 2.93 | • 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 60% | • 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 85% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arminia Bielefeld 0 - 1 - 0 Darmstadt 98. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98?
The 2. Bundesliga match finished Arminia Bielefeld 2:1 Darmstadt 98. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98?
Arminia Bielefeld score 1.44 goals per game on average and Darmstadt 98 1.81. The 2. Bundesliga average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Arminia Bielefeld's matches and 59% of Darmstadt 98's.
What form are Arminia Bielefeld and Darmstadt 98 in?
Over the last 5 games Arminia Bielefeld have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Darmstadt 98 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Arminia Bielefeld vs Darmstadt 98: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


