AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: match statistics
AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AS Eupen played Beerschot-Wilrijk in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
AS Eupen: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Beerschot-Wilrijk: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
AS Eupen scores 1.33 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.57 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AS Eupen 50%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 53%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 43%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 47%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Beerschot-Wilrijk has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.17. AS Eupen: 10.1 shots per match, Beerschot-Wilrijk: 15.6.
Match halves
AS Eupen: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.67. Beerschot-Wilrijk: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
AS Eupen: 31-45+ (10 goals). Beerschot-Wilrijk: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beerschot-Wilrijk appears to be the favorite: they have 18 wins this season versus 12 for AS Eupen, sit 3rd, and have won all 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals, while Eupen has 3 wins and 6 goals in that period. The visitors create more chances — averaging 15.4 shots and 4.93 shots on target in away games with average xG 1.80, versus 10.53 shots and 3.33 shots on target for the hosts with xG 1.21. Defensively both teams concede on average 0.87 goals per game, but Eupen has conceded only 1 goal in the last 5 matches compared to 2 for Beerschot, which does not offset the visitors' advantage. Beerschot fail to score less often (13% of matches without a goal vs 20% for Eupen) and have more clean sheets (47% vs 40%), and have also scored more goals this season (47 vs 40). Considering better form (an average of 3 points per game in the last 5 for the visitors vs 2 for the hosts), higher xG and a greater number of shots, I predict an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 60% for AS Eupen and 47% for Beerschot, vs a league average of 54%, favoring the "both teams to score" scenario especially for the home side. Both teams produce similar attacking xG: 1.77 (Eupen) vs 1.80 (Beerschot), totalling 3.57 xG, and average goals scored are 1.53 and 1.60 with 5.07 and 4.93 shots on target respectively, so goal-scoring opportunities exist on both ends. Form over the last 5 matches is mixed: Eupen have scored 6 and conceded 1 (avg 1.2 and 0.2), Beerschot 12 and 2 (2.4 and 0.4), however BTTS in the last 5 is only 0% for Eupen and 20% for Beerschot, weakening the short-term signal. Additionally, Beerschot have kept a clean sheet in 47% of matches vs 33% for Eupen, and 0-0 occurs in 13% of both teams’ matches, which is a counterargument; nevertheless the xG balance and the home side’s seasonal BTTS rate argue for "BTTS - Yes", hence an estimated probability of 65% vs 35%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.58 goals for AS Eupen (attacking xG 1.77 vs opponent defense 1.38) and 1.54 for Beerschot (attacking xG 1.80 vs home defense 1.29), totaling 3.12 goals, which exceeds the 2.5 line. Seasonally, over 1.5 goals occurred in 73% of both teams’ matches, and over 2.5 in 47% of each team’s games, so the 1.5 line is historically safe while the 2.5 line has mixed statistics. The visitors’ current form is significant: 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 avg) and recent xG 1.73, whereas the hosts have 6 goals in their last 5 (1.2) and xG 1.23, which increases the probability of a higher total. Both teams generate similar shot volumes (15.8 vs 15.4) and shots on target (5.07 vs 4.93), so conversion to goals is realistic and supports Over 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beerschot-Wilrijk have an impressive run — they have won all 5 of their last matches (5/5, 100%) and have led at the break in 5/5, averaging 1.6 first-half goals while conceding none at half-time (first-half goals conceded = 0.0). AS Eupen have won 3 of their last 5 matches (3/5, 60%) and score an average of 0.8 goals by the break, giving them less opening-game momentum than their opponents. Season-long xG figures for both teams are similar: 1.77 for Eupen vs. 1.8 for Beerschot, but the visitors have a higher seasonal win rate 67% vs. 53% and a better points-per-game average 2.13 vs. 1.87. Although seasonal stats show many clean sheets at half-time (87% for the home side and 80% for the visitors), the visitors’ last five matches indicate an aggressive start, so the strongest signal from the data is the visitors leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (selection 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AS Eupen | Beerschot-Wilrijk | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - AS Eupen · 3 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.57 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - AS Eupen · 0.9 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
AS Eupen scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AS Eupen
Over / Under - Beerschot-Wilrijk
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1.73 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AS Eupen
Beerschot-Wilrijk
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| AS Eupen | Liga | Beerschot-Wilrijk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 26% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 71% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 78% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: AS Eupen 0 - 1 - 0 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
The First Division B match finished AS Eupen 3:3 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
AS Eupen score 1.33 goals per game on average and Beerschot-Wilrijk 1.57. The First Division B average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of AS Eupen's matches and 53% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's.
What form are AS Eupen and Beerschot-Wilrijk in?
Over the last 5 games AS Eupen have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Beerschot-Wilrijk 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
The statistical background for AS Eupen vs Beerschot-Wilrijk — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.