Belgium - First Division BData current as of 22 July 2026

AS Eupen vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics

AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Lokeren-Temse crest
Lokeren-Temse
135%(2.60)
X35%(3.10)
230%(2.45)

The match promises to be extremely evenly matched, pointing towards a draw. AS Eupen presents solid home form with 44% wins at home and a goal difference of +3, yet their last five overall matches yielded only 1.4 points per match. Lokeren-Temse is in excellent shape with a five-match unbeaten streak (2 wins, 3 draws) and a better PPG (1.8). The visitors also demonstrate an advantage in away xG statistics (1.41 vs 1.22 for the hosts), suggesting superior quality in creating chances. Even possession averages (52% vs 53%) and similar rates of goals scored and conceded (around 1.2-1.4 per match) further confirm the thesis of balanced forces. Considering Lokeren's high away efficiency (50% wins) and the hosts' unstable recent form, a sharing of points appears to be the most probable scenario.

AS Eupen vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AS Eupen play Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 27 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Lokeren-Temse: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse scores 1.50 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AS Eupen 53%, Lokeren-Temse 75%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 47%, Lokeren-Temse 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.21. AS Eupen: 10.5 shots per match, Lokeren-Temse: 13.0.

Match halves

AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66. Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). Lokeren-Temse: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The match promises to be extremely evenly matched, pointing towards a draw. AS Eupen presents solid home form with 44% wins at home and a goal difference of +3, yet their last five overall matches yielded only 1.4 points per match. Lokeren-Temse is in excellent shape with a five-match unbeaten streak (2 wins, 3 draws) and a better PPG (1.8). The visitors also demonstrate an advantage in away xG statistics (1.41 vs 1.22 for the hosts), suggesting superior quality in creating chances. Even possession averages (52% vs 53%) and similar rates of goals scored and conceded (around 1.2-1.4 per match) further confirm the thesis of balanced forces. Considering Lokeren's high away efficiency (50% wins) and the hosts' unstable recent form, a sharing of points appears to be the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
11Shots20
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
6Shots on target7
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.44xG1.98
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
6Corners8
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
44Dangerous attacks33
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
19Fouls7
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
2Cards0
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.38Goals scored / match1.5
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.13Goals conceded / match1.41
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
52%Average possession53%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
3.81Shots on target / match4.28
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match12.97
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
3.81Shots on target4.28
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
13.1%Shot conversion11.6%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
52%Possession53%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.21xG for1.5
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.61xG against1.47
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

Shooting quality

AS Eupen: Efficient finishingLokeren-Temse: Balanced
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lokeren-Temse is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1.8 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Lokeren-Temse
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-10
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lokeren-Temse is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.5 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

AS Eupen is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.41 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

Lokeren-Temse scoring profile: very strong

Lokeren-Temse scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

44Goals scored (season)48
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
36Goals conceded (season)45
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
2.5Average goals in match2.91
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
6Goals scored (last 5)12
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal84%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
38%2 goals44%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
13%3 goals16%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
3%4 goals6%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal88%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
38%2 goals38%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
13%3 goals16%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
0%4 goals0%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time25%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
6%BTTS in both halves13%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
16%Scored in both halves25%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
40%BTTS - last 5100%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1.09 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Lokeren-Temse - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.09
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.59
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.25
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
59%Clean sheet before half-time41%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
50%No goal before half-time59%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.38
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.66
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
59%Clean sheet after half-time38%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse
50%No goal after half-time31%
AS EupenLokeren-Temse

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lokeren-Temse - second-half results

28% W53% R19% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Lokeren-Temse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Lokeren-Temse
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
2
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
9
46-60
10
4
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+122%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Lokeren-Temse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

AS EupenLigaLokeren-Temse
Average goals in match 2.502.84 2.91
Both teams scored 53%55% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%54% 53%
Clean sheets 38%26% 13%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AS Eupen 0 - 1 - 0 Lokeren-Temse. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KSC Lokeren-Temse
3 : 3
KAS Eupen

FAQ

What was the result of AS Eupen vs Lokeren-Temse?

The First Division B match finished AS Eupen 1:1 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AS Eupen vs Lokeren-Temse?

AS Eupen score 1.38 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 1.50. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of AS Eupen's matches and 75% of Lokeren-Temse's.

What form are AS Eupen and Lokeren-Temse in?

Over the last 5 games AS Eupen have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Eupen vs Lokeren-Temse?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.