Belgium - First Division BData current as of 22 July 2026

AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
0 : 0half-time 0:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
155%(1.80)
X28%(3.30)
217%(3.70)

AS Eupen displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals per home match and concede only 0.93, giving them an edge over the visitors. RFC Seraing, despite good recent overall form (4 wins in the last 5 matches), performs significantly worse away from home – with only a 21% away win rate, a negative -8 goal difference, and as many as 50% of matches without scoring. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 1.43 goals on the road, which, given the hosts' solid attack, poses a significant problem. Considering Eupen's home advantage, their superior efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 7% for the visitors), and greater ball possession (52% vs 41%), I anticipate a home win, although Seraing's away form in recent weeks does not rule out an upset.

AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AS Eupen play RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. RFC Seraing: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.16 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AS Eupen 53%, RFC Seraing 50%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 47%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

RFC Seraing has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.21. AS Eupen: 10.5 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 11.8.

Match halves

AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

AS Eupen displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals per home match and concede only 0.93, giving them an edge over the visitors. RFC Seraing, despite good recent overall form (4 wins in the last 5 matches), performs significantly worse away from home – with only a 21% away win rate, a negative -8 goal difference, and as many as 50% of matches without scoring. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 1.43 goals on the road, which, given the hosts' solid attack, poses a significant problem. Considering Eupen's home advantage, their superior efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 7% for the visitors), and greater ball possession (52% vs 41%), I anticipate a home win, although Seraing's away form in recent weeks does not rule out an upset.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3Shots13
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1Shots on target6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.5xG1.6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3Corners7
AS EupenRFC Seraing
32Dangerous attacks50
AS EupenRFC Seraing
12Fouls6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1Cards1
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.38Goals scored / match1.16
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.13Goals conceded / match1.38
AS EupenRFC Seraing
52%Average possession41%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3.81Shots on target / match4
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match11.75
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3.81Shots on target4
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13.1%Shot conversion9.8%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
52%Possession41%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.21xG for1.37
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.61xG against1.48
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

AS Eupen: Efficient finishingRFC Seraing: Balanced
AS EupenRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1.2 pts / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
RFC Seraing
DDWDL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-6
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.16 goals / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.38 goals / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

44Goals scored (season)37
AS EupenRFC Seraing
36Goals conceded (season)44
AS EupenRFC Seraing
2.5Average goals in match2.53
AS EupenRFC Seraing
6Goals scored (last 5)6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
AS EupenRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal66%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
38%2 goals31%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13%3 goals13%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3%4 goals6%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal72%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
38%2 goals47%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13%3 goals13%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0%4 goals3%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
6%BTTS in both halves3%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
16%Scored in both halves19%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 560%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen · 0.91 pts / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.91
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.34
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.97
AS EupenRFC Seraing
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
50%No goal before half-time72%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.41
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.47
AS EupenRFC Seraing
59%Clean sheet after half-time56%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
50%No goal after half-time44%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

AS EupenLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 2.502.84 2.53
Both teams scored 53%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%54% 50%
Clean sheets 38%26% 28%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 56%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AS Eupen 1 - 0 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished AS Eupen 0:0 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

AS Eupen score 1.38 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.16. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of AS Eupen's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are AS Eupen and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games AS Eupen have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.