Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
0 : 0half-time 0:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
155%(1.80)
X28%(3.30)
217%(3.70)

AS Eupen displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals per home match and concede only 0.93, giving them an edge over the visitors. RFC Seraing, despite good recent overall form (4 wins in the last 5 matches), performs significantly worse away from home – with only a 21% away win rate, a negative -8 goal difference, and as many as 50% of matches without scoring. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 1.43 goals on the road, which, given the hosts' solid attack, poses a significant problem. Considering Eupen's home advantage, their superior efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 7% for the visitors), and greater ball possession (52% vs 41%), I anticipate a home win, although Seraing's away form in recent weeks does not rule out an upset.

AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AS Eupen played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 20 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. RFC Seraing: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

AS Eupen scores 1.39 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.18 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AS Eupen 54%, RFC Seraing 50%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 46%, RFC Seraing 54%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

RFC Seraing has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.20. AS Eupen: 10.4 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 12.1.

Match halves

AS Eupen: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.71. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

AS Eupen: 31-45+ (9 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AS Eupen displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals per home match and concede only 0.93, giving them an edge over the visitors. RFC Seraing, despite good recent overall form (4 wins in the last 5 matches), performs significantly worse away from home – with only a 21% away win rate, a negative -8 goal difference, and as many as 50% of matches without scoring. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 1.43 goals on the road, which, given the hosts' solid attack, poses a significant problem. Considering Eupen's home advantage, their superior efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 7% for the visitors), and greater ball possession (52% vs 41%), I anticipate a home win, although Seraing's away form in recent weeks does not rule out an upset.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3Shots13
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1Shots on target6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.5xG1.6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3Corners7
AS EupenRFC Seraing
32Dangerous attacks50
AS EupenRFC Seraing
12Fouls6
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1Cards1
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.39Goals scored / match1.18
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.11Goals conceded / match1.46
AS EupenRFC Seraing
52%Average possession40%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3.75Shots on target / match3.93
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.39Shots per match12.11
AS EupenRFC Seraing
3.75Shots on target3.93
AS EupenRFC Seraing
13.4%Shot conversion9.7%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
52%Possession40%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.2xG for1.4
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.63xG against1.5
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

AS Eupen: Efficient finishingRFC Seraing: Balanced
AS EupenRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RFC Seraing is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen · 2 pts / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen
DDWLW
Season result split
39% W32% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
RFC Seraing
LWWWD
Season result split
25% W32% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-12
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-6
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.18 goals / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - AS Eupen · 1.46 goals / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).

39Goals scored (season)33
AS EupenRFC Seraing
31Goals conceded (season)41
AS EupenRFC Seraing
2.5Average goals in match2.64
AS EupenRFC Seraing
8Goals scored (last 5)11
AS EupenRFC Seraing
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
AS EupenRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal64%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
39%2 goals32%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
11%3 goals14%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
4%4 goals7%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal75%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
36%2 goals50%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
11%3 goals14%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0%4 goals4%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time18%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
4%BTTS in both halves4%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
14%Scored in both halves18%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 540%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - AS Eupen · 0.82 pts / match - RFC Seraing

AS Eupen - half-time state
36% leading36% draw29% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
11% leading50% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)0.82
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.36
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.07
AS EupenRFC Seraing
61%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
54%No goal before half-time71%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.43
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
AS EupenRFC Seraing
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
AS EupenRFC Seraing
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.46
AS EupenRFC Seraing
61%Clean sheet after half-time57%
AS EupenRFC Seraing
46%No goal after half-time46%
AS EupenRFC Seraing

AS Eupen - second-half results

39% W39% R21% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding227%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
7
7
16-30
9
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
6
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
2
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.93
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

AS EupenLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 2.502.79 2.64
Both teams scored 54%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%52% 54%
Clean sheets 36%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%72% 61%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Scott Fitzgerald KennedyOff: Ihor Plastun
  2. RFC SeraingYellow cardAkpa Chukwu Hemsley
  3. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Gabriel BaresOff: Oriol Busquets Mas
  4. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Thiago Paulo da SilvaOff: Fostave Mabani
  5. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Zakaria AtteriOff: Bertan Çalışkan
  6. AS EupenYellow cardYentl Van Genechten

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Arne De BeuckelaerMatches officiated: 15
4.53Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 220%Home wins40%Draws40%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AS Eupen 1 - 0 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished AS Eupen 0:0 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

AS Eupen score 1.39 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.18. The First Division B average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 54% of AS Eupen's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are AS Eupen and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games AS Eupen have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and RFC Seraing 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AS Eupen vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.