Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

AS Kigali vs Gicumbi: match statistics

AS Kigali crest
AS Kigali
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Gicumbi crest
Gicumbi

AS Kigali vs Gicumbi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AS Kigali played Gicumbi in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

AS Kigali: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Gicumbi: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

AS Kigali scores 0.69 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Gicumbi scores 1.10 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AS Kigali 38%, Gicumbi 58%. Over 2.5: AS Kigali 28%, Gicumbi 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

AS Kigali has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.11. AS Kigali: 7.6 shots per match, Gicumbi: 6.8.

Match halves

AS Kigali: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.50. Gicumbi: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

AS Kigali: 46-60 (6 goals). Gicumbi: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X): AS Kigali records as many as 60% of home matches ending in draws and scores only 0.47 goals per home game, failing to score in 60% of fixtures. Gicumbi has better recent form — 3 wins in the last 5 matches, 7 goals in that period and an average of 1.8 points per game versus AS Kigali’s 0.8. Defensively the hosts have the edge: AS Kigali concedes 0.93 goals at home with xG against 1.29, while Gicumbi concedes 1.6 goals away with xG against 1.19, suggesting a goal-limited affair. Offensively the visitors are more efficient — 15% shot conversion away compared to just 5% for the hosts, despite the hosts taking more shots (8.93 vs 7.43) and more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.57). Considering AS Kigali’s high home draw rate and Gicumbi’s superior form, I assess draw probability at 50%, away win 30% and home win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I select BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome due to clearly elevated season metrics for both teams: AS Kigali has BTTS in 63% of matches, Gicumbi in 53%, versus the league level of 44%. Both sides defend poorly — AS Kigali concedes 1.5 goals per match, Gicumbi 1.6, and clean sheet expected is low at only 19% (home) and 20% (away). In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 40% of games for both teams, though the away side scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) versus 3 goals for the home team (0.6), indicating greater recent attacking efficiency from Gicumbi. Attacking xG is 1.10 for AS Kigali and 1.13 for Gicumbi, with xG against of 1.23 and 1.19 respectively, and average shots on target 2.44 vs 2.57 — this suggests both teams create and allow chances. Considering these figures, I assess the BTTS probability at 65% versus 35% for No Goal, because the high season BTTS rates (63%/53%) and the large number of goals conceded (1.5 and 1.6) provide a stronger signal for Yes despite moderate form over the last five matches.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Offensive xG are 1.10 for AS Kigali and 1.13 for Gicumbi; after accounting for xG conceded (1.19 for Gicumbi and 1.23 for AS Kigali) adjusted expected goals are roughly 1.15 for the home side and 1.18 for the visitors, totaling 2.33 goals. Seasonal rates show 88% of AS Kigali matches and 73% of Gicumbi matches finished over 1.5 goals, with BTTS in 63% and 53% of fixtures respectively, which strongly favors Over 1.5. Signals for Over 2.5 are mixed: AS Kigali have 56% of matches >2.5, Gicumbi 40%, and the league average for Over 2.5 is 37% — with expected 2.33 goals I assess Over 2.5 at about a 45% probability. Over 3.5 is unlikely (seasonal 13% and 33%); additionally average shots 6.75/7.43 and on-target 2.44/2.57 do not indicate regularly exceeding the 3.5 threshold, so Under 3.5 is the preferred hedge. On this basis I recommend an OVER on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a half-time draw with a home win at full-time (X/1). A draw at the break occurs in 50% of AS Kigali’s matches, while the home side led at half-time in 25% of fixtures, so the most common scoreline at 45 minutes is a draw. AS Kigali has a higher average points per match (1.31 vs 0.93 for Gicumbi) and wins 38% of games compared to the visitors’ 20% win rate, suggesting that draws are more often converted into home wins. Hosts score on average 1.5 goals after the break versus 1.07 for the away side, and shot conversion is 17% versus 15%, which increases the probability of a second-half decision in favor of the home team. However, note the visitors’ recent form over the last five matches (60% wins for Gicumbi vs 20% for AS Kigali), so I assign moderate weight also to the scenarios X/2 and 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
AS KigaliGicumbi
3Shots11
AS KigaliGicumbi
2Shots on target1
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.91xG1.41
AS KigaliGicumbi
4Corners7
AS KigaliGicumbi
77Dangerous attacks87
AS KigaliGicumbi
19Fouls14
AS KigaliGicumbi
0Cards0
AS KigaliGicumbi

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.69Goals scored / match1.1
AS KigaliGicumbi
1.16Goals conceded / match1.55
AS KigaliGicumbi
44%Average possession48%
AS KigaliGicumbi
2.5Shots on target / match2.39
AS KigaliGicumbi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.56Shots per match6.81
AS KigaliGicumbi
2.5Shots on target2.39
AS KigaliGicumbi
9.1%Shot conversion16.1%
AS KigaliGicumbi
44%Possession48%
AS KigaliGicumbi
1.25xG for1.11
AS KigaliGicumbi
1.36xG against1.21
AS KigaliGicumbi

Shooting quality

AS Kigali: BalancedGicumbi: Efficient finishing
AS KigaliGicumbi
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gicumbi is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - AS Kigali · 1.8 pts / match - Gicumbi

AS Kigali
WDLLL
Season result split
19% W34% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-11-15
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-9-6
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gicumbi
WWLLW
Season result split
29% W26% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-7
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gicumbi is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - AS Kigali · 1.1 goals / match - Gicumbi

AS Kigali is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - AS Kigali · 1.55 goals / match - Gicumbi

AS Kigali scoring profile: strong

AS Kigali scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Gicumbi keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 matches).

Gicumbi scoring profile: strong

Gicumbi scores in 71% of matches (22 of 31 matches), while AS Kigali keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

22Goals scored (season)34
AS KigaliGicumbi
37Goals conceded (season)48
AS KigaliGicumbi
1.84Average goals in match2.65
AS KigaliGicumbi
3Goals scored (last 5)7
AS KigaliGicumbi
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
AS KigaliGicumbi

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal71%
AS KigaliGicumbi
13%2 goals29%
AS KigaliGicumbi
0%3 goals6%
AS KigaliGicumbi
0%4 goals3%
AS KigaliGicumbi

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal81%
AS KigaliGicumbi
41%2 goals42%
AS KigaliGicumbi
9%3 goals23%
AS KigaliGicumbi
3%4 goals6%
AS KigaliGicumbi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time35%
AS KigaliGicumbi
6%BTTS in both halves10%
AS KigaliGicumbi
9%Scored in both halves16%
AS KigaliGicumbi

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AS KigaliGicumbi
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
AS KigaliGicumbi
40%BTTS - last 540%
AS KigaliGicumbi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
AS KigaliGicumbi
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
AS KigaliGicumbi
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AS KigaliGicumbi

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
AS KigaliGicumbi
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
AS KigaliGicumbi
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
AS KigaliGicumbi

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gicumbi is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - AS Kigali · 1.1 pts / match - Gicumbi

AS Kigali - half-time state
3% leading66% draw31% trailing
Gicumbi - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.1
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.19Goals scored (1st half)0.61
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.72Average goals (1st half)1.35
AS KigaliGicumbi
56%Clean sheet before half-time42%
AS KigaliGicumbi
81%No goal before half-time48%
AS KigaliGicumbi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)0.94
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
AS KigaliGicumbi
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
AS KigaliGicumbi
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.29
AS KigaliGicumbi
53%Clean sheet after half-time39%
AS KigaliGicumbi
53%No goal after half-time65%
AS KigaliGicumbi

AS Kigali - second-half results

25% W47% R28% P
24
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding633%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gicumbi - second-half results

16% W45% R39% P
34
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Kigali - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Gicumbi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AS Kigali
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
6
16-30
2
10
31-45
6
2
46-60
5
9
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Gicumbi
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
8
31-45
2
6
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AS Kigali

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Gicumbi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

AS KigaliLigaGicumbi
Average goals in match 1.842.07 2.65
Both teams scored 38%44% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%37% 48%
Clean sheets 38%35% 19%
Goal before half-time 47%60% 74%
Goal after half-time 72%69% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AS Kigali 0 - 0 - 1 Gicumbi. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Gicumbi
2 : 1
AS Kigali

FAQ

What was the result of AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?

The National Soccer League match finished AS Kigali 2:1 Gicumbi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?

AS Kigali score 0.69 goals per game on average and Gicumbi 1.10. The National Soccer League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 38% of AS Kigali's matches and 58% of Gicumbi's.

What form are AS Kigali and Gicumbi in?

Over the last 5 games AS Kigali have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gicumbi 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.