South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City: match statistics

Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City

Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Asan Mugunghwa played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Asan Mugunghwa: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Gimhae City: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Asan Mugunghwa scores 2.00 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.60 and concedes 2.80. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Asan Mugunghwa 80%, Gimhae City 60%. Over 2.5: Asan Mugunghwa 80%, Gimhae City 80%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Asan Mugunghwa has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.12. Asan Mugunghwa: 11.8 shots per match, Gimhae City: 8.8.

Match halves

Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40. Gimhae City: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (4 goals). Gimhae City: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is Asan Mugunghwa — the home side have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals in that period, while Gimhae City have lost all 5 of their most recent fixtures and conceded 14 goals. At home Asan average 2.0 goals and register 12 shots per match with 4.67 shots on target, at a conversion rate of 17%, whereas Gimhae on the road average just 0.5 goals, 5.5 shots and a 9% conversion. The quality gap in chance creation is confirmed by xG: the hosts’ average xG is 1.46 versus the visitors’ 0.98, indicating Asan generate more high-quality opportunities. Defensively the hosts concede 1.67 goals at home on average, while the visitors concede 2.5 on the road; the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches, whereas Gimhae have not recorded any clean sheets and failed to score in 50% of away games. Considering the advantage in shots (12 vs 5.5), efficiency (17% vs 9%) and form (Asan averaging 1.8 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 0 for Gimhae), I predict a home win as the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a clear propensity to concede: Asan concedes on average 3.0 goals per match, Gimhae 2.5, and in the last 5 matches they conceded 1.8 and 2.8 respectively. Seasonal BTTS rates are 67% for Asan and 50% for Gimhae, versus a league average of 65%, while in the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS in 80% (4/5) and the away side in 60% (3/5). The home attack looks stronger — Asan scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg) with last5 xG 1.42 and season xG 1.22, whereas Gimhae has 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 avg) with last5 xG 1.23 and season xG 0.98, indicating the visitors can still generate chances despite a poor goal return. Additionally, neither team has a clean sheet this season (0% CS for both), and the combined seasonal goal record is 10 scored/8 conceded for the home side and 3 scored/14 conceded for the away side, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. Considering these figures — high average goals conceded (3.0 and 2.5), strong home BTTS (67% and 80% in the last 5) and a league average of 65% — BTTS 'Yes' is the strongest signal, so I assign it a 75% probability.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The home side have xG_for_avg 1.22 versus the visitors' 0.98, and in the last 5 matches the home team scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) while the visitors managed only 3 goals (0.6 per match). Defenses are vulnerable: seasonally the home side concede 3.0 goals per game on average, the visitors 2.5; in the last 5 matches the home defense conceded 1.8 on average, the visitors 2.8. Over indicators favor a goal-heavy match: both teams have seasonOver15Percentage 100% (all matches >1.5), in the last 5 fixtures the percentage of games over 2.5 is 80% for both, and the home side has seasonOver25Percentage 100% versus 50% for the visitors. The combined xG 1.22+0.98=2.20 is adjusted upward slightly considering the home form (10 goals in 5) and the high home BTTS rate (67%), so I project about 1.40 goals for the home side and 0.95 for the visitors, roughly ~2.35 total. The strongest signal is over 1.5 (I pick Over on the 1.5 line) with a probability of 96%; Over 2.5 is assessed at 72% (last 5: 80% over2.5, home 100% vs visitors 50%), and Over 3.5 at 35% given seasonal 33–50% for >3.5 and a league average of ~2.94 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at the break and home win (X/1), because Asan clearly improves after the break: in the last 5 matches they average 1.4 goals after halftime versus Gimhae’s 0.4 and earn on average 1.8 points in second halves versus the visitors’ 0.2. At halftime fewer goals tend to be scored and a draw is likely — in the last 5 meetings Asan averaged 0.6 goals at HT versus Gimhae’s 0.2, and over the season Asan records 0.33 HT goals versus 0.0 for the opponent. Additionally, the hosts create more chances (xG 1.22 vs. 0.98 for Gimhae) and take on average 11 shots versus the visitors’ 5.5, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in the second half in Asan’s favor. The visitors are in very poor form (last 5 matches: 5 defeats) and were losing at the break in 80% of those five games, so it is unlikely they will lead and hold the lead. Therefore I rate X/1 highest (~35%), then 1/1 (~15%) and X/X (~20%), while scenarios with the visitors leading are rated low.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
11Shots12
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
3Shots on target2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.36xG1.2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
8Corners5
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
61Dangerous attacks41
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
8Fouls8
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1Cards1
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
2Goals scored / match0.6
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.6Goals conceded / match2.8
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
52%Average possession45%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
4.4Shots on target / match3.2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.8Shots per match8.8
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
4.4Shots on target3.2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
16.9%Shot conversion6.8%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
52%Possession45%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.54xG for1.12
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.33xG against1.75
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Shooting quality

Asan Mugunghwa: Efficient finishingGimhae City: Balanced
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Asan Mugunghwa
WLLWW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Gimhae City
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 233% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.6 goals / match - Gimhae City

Asan Mugunghwa is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 2.8 goals / match - Gimhae City

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Gimhae City scoring profile: strong

Gimhae City scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

10Goals scored (season)3
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
8Goals conceded (season)14
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
3.6Average goals in match3.4
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
10Goals scored (last 5)3
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
8Goals conceded (last 5)14
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
60%2 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%3 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
60%2 goals100%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
20%3 goals60%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
0%4 goals20%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%BTTS in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%Scored in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
80%BTTS - last 560%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Asan Mugunghwa is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.6 pts / match - Gimhae City

Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing
Gimhae City - half-time state
20% leading0% draw80% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)0.6
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.6Average goals (1st half)1
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
20%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%No goal before half-time80%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)0.2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)2
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
2Average goals (2nd half)2.4
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
40%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City
20%No goal after half-time60%
Asan MugunghwaGimhae City

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimhae City - second-half results

0% W20% D80% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
199%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Asan MugunghwaLigaGimhae City
Average goals in match 3.602.91 3.40
Both teams scored 80%63% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%61% 80%
Clean sheets 20%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%83% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%70% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+-6%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Asan MugunghwaGoalCharles Lokoli NgoyAssist: Naeem Mohammed
  2. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Bruno Xavier Almeida CostaOff: Byung-Kwon Yoon
  3. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Hye-Sung KimOff: Je-hee Yun
  4. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Rae-Jun LeeOff: Hyun-Deok Kim
  5. Gimhae CityYellow cardMaissa El Hadji Fall
  6. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardHee-Won Choe
  7. Gimhae CityGoalSeung-Jae LeeAssist: Kyung-Soo Kim
  8. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Min-young LeeOff: Seung-Jae Lee
  9. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Willian Moreira da Silva MarcilioOff: Young-Nam Kim
  10. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Jung-Hyun KimOff: Joon-Ho Son

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City?

The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 1:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City?

Asan Mugunghwa score 2.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.60. The K League 2 average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 60% of Gimhae City's.

What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Gimhae City in?

Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Gimhae City 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City?

The statistical background for Asan Mugunghwa vs Gimhae City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.