Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam: match statistics
Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Asan Mugunghwa played Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 12 July 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Asan Mugunghwa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Gyeongnam: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.53 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.27 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Asan Mugunghwa 60%, Gyeongnam 67%. Over 2.5: Asan Mugunghwa 60%, Gyeongnam 53%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Asan Mugunghwa has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.31. Asan Mugunghwa: 10.5 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 11.3.
Match halves
Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (7 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Asan Mugunghwa holds an offensive efficiency advantage at home — averaging 1.88 goals scored per game with an average xG of 1.29, while Gyeongnam scores only 0.83 goals away with xG 1.26. The gap in output stems from conversion: the home side posts an 18% shot conversion on 10.38 shots per game, whereas the visitors convert 8% on 10.5 shots, so Asan turns a similar volume of attempts into far more goals. Goal and clean sheet metrics are also significant — Asan has not had a match without scoring at home (0% of home matches without a goal) and records 25% clean sheets, while Gyeongnam has 50% of away matches without scoring and 0% away clean sheets. Over the last 5 matches both teams average 1.6 points and share an identical 2-2-1 record, but across the season Asan wins 50% of home fixtures with a +3 goal difference, whereas Gyeongnam as a visitor has only a 17% win rate and a -4 goal difference. Considering the superior finishing (1.88 vs 0.83), better conversion (18% vs 8%) and more consistent home metrics, I favor the home side to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS (Both Teams To Score) appears more likely: Asan has a seasonal BTTS rate of 78% (last 5 matches 60%), while Gyeongnam is 50% for the season but 80% in the last 5. Both teams produce similar xG — Asan 1.34 vs Gyeongnam 1.26 — and seasonal goals per game of 1.56 for Asan and 0.83 for Gyeongnam, with last 5 figures of 1.4 for Asan and 1.6 for Gyeongnam. Defenses are vulnerable: Asan concedes 1.67 goals on average this season and has only 11% clean sheets, while Gyeongnam has 0% clean sheets and concedes 1.5 on average (1.6 in the last 5). Additionally, Asan averages 11.78 shots and 3.67 on target with a 13% conversion rate, whereas Gyeongnam averages 10.5 shots and 3.33 on target with an 8% conversion rate, creating real chances for both sides. Considering Asan’s 78% BTTS, Gyeongnam’s 80% in the last 5 and a league-wide BTTS level of 62%, I assign BTTS - Yes a 72% probability versus 28% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics point to a match with goals: Asan scores 1.56 and concedes 1.67 at home, while Gyeongnam away scores 0.83 and concedes 1.50; xG are 1.34 for Asan and 1.26 for Gyeongnam, yielding an estimate of ~1.39 goals for the home side and ~1.27 for the visitors (total 2.66). In the last 5 matches Asan has scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) with average xG 1.13, and Gyeongnam 8 goals (1.6) with xG 1.45, confirming moderate attacking potential for both teams. Both teams have a high share of Over 1.5 this season: 78% (Asan) and 83% (Gyeongnam), hence a high probability for Over 1.5 (81%). For the 2.5 line there is a divergence — Asan at home has 78% of matches over 2.5, Gyeongnam away only 17%, and the last 5 matches for both teams show 60% Over 2.5, which together gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (56%). Over 3.5 is less likely: 44% (Asan) vs 17% (Gyeongnam) averages to ~30.5%, therefore I assigned 31% to Over 3.5 (Under 69%); the strongest signal from the data is therefore Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Asan average 1.56 goals per match versus Gyeongnam’s 0.83, with xG of 1.34 versus 1.26, confirming Asan’s offensive advantage. At half-time the hosts led in 22% of matches and were level in 44% (the visitors were level at half in 50%), and on average Asan score 0.44 goals by the break versus 0.33 for their opponents, so first halves often finish tied with a low goal count. In the second half Asan average 1.11 goals versus 0.5 for Gyeongnam and have 89% of matches with over 0.5 goals in the second half (visitors 67%), which indicates that decisive action comes after the break. Additionally the hosts have 44% wins this season versus 17% for the visitors and a higher shot conversion rate 13% vs 8%, so the strongest signal is a turnaround after half-time. Therefore I select a Half-Time draw and a Home win after 90 minutes (X/1) as the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Asan Mugunghwa | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Asan Mugunghwa is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.27 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Asan Mugunghwa is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.6 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Asan Mugunghwa scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
Gyeongnam scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Asan Mugunghwa
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Asan Mugunghwa is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.87 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Asan Mugunghwa
Gyeongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Asan Mugunghwa | Liga | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.73 | 2.80 | • 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 57% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Asan Mugunghwa 2 - 1 - 0 Gyeongnam. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Gyeongnam?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 2, Gyeongnam won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?
Asan Mugunghwa score 1.53 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.27. The K League 2 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.
What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Gyeongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


