South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong: match statistics

Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
155%(2.35)
X30%(3.00)
215%(3.23)

Asan Mugunghwa demonstrates significantly better scoring form at home, averaging 2.5 goals per home match, while Hwaseong has yet to score any goals away this season (FTS% 100%). The hosts have won 50% of their home matches and have a goal difference of 0, while the visitors have lost all their away matches with a negative goal difference of -1. Asan Mugunghwa's recent overall form is dynamic with three wins in their last five matches (PPG 1.8), while Hwaseong has only one win and mostly draws (PPG 1.2). Although the hosts' defense raises some concerns (averaging 2.5 goals conceded per home match), their offensive advantage and the visitors' scoring issues favor an Asan Mugunghwa victory. However, Hwaseong's high percentage of draws in overall form and the defensive solidity of the visitors (averaging 1 goal conceded away) suggest that a draw is also possible.

Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Asan Mugunghwa played Hwaseong in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Asan Mugunghwa: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Hwaseong: 1-2-1, 1.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

Asan Mugunghwa scores 2.00 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Hwaseong scores 1.00 and concedes 0.75. League average: 3.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Asan Mugunghwa 100%, Hwaseong 25%. Over 2.5: Asan Mugunghwa 100%, Hwaseong 25%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Hwaseong has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.42. Asan Mugunghwa: 11.0 shots per match, Hwaseong: 12.3.

Match halves

Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.33. Hwaseong: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Asan Mugunghwa: 31-45+ (2 goals). Hwaseong: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Asan Mugunghwa demonstrates significantly better scoring form at home, averaging 2.5 goals per home match, while Hwaseong has yet to score any goals away this season (FTS% 100%). The hosts have won 50% of their home matches and have a goal difference of 0, while the visitors have lost all their away matches with a negative goal difference of -1. Asan Mugunghwa's recent overall form is dynamic with three wins in their last five matches (PPG 1.8), while Hwaseong has only one win and mostly draws (PPG 1.2). Although the hosts' defense raises some concerns (averaging 2.5 goals conceded per home match), their offensive advantage and the visitors' scoring issues favor an Asan Mugunghwa victory. However, Hwaseong's high percentage of draws in overall form and the defensive solidity of the visitors (averaging 1 goal conceded away) suggest that a draw is also possible.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data severely underrates Hwaseong's BTTS chances: 0% BTTS, 100% FTS, along with 0.0 goals per match and 0% shot conversion. Asan has a solid defensive profile this season (0.67 goals conceded per match and 67% clean sheets), which further limits the visitors' scoring probability. Although Asan's form from the last 5 matches is more 'open' (80% BTTS and 1.6 goals conceded per match), Hwaseong still has a low goal average in the last 5 (0.8) and only 2 shots on target per match. In qualitative terms, the visitors' xG (1.21 for the season, 1.48 in the last 5) suggests goal potential, but their current inefficiency undermines the credibility of this signal. The most likely scenario is a goal for Asan and no goal for Hwaseong, hence the preference for BTTS: NO.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model indicates a moderate goal tally (total xG ~2.17), as Asan generates solid attacking xG (1.53) and more shots on target (4.33), but Hwaseong has a relatively good xG against (0.90). The visitors' goal potential is limited by low actual output and efficiency (shot conversion 0.0 and 100% FTS), despite a decent attacking xG (1.21; 1.48 in the last 5 matches). Asan has a high season clean sheet rate (67%), which further lowers the probability of a 4+ goal match. On the other hand, Asan's form in the last 5 games has been over-oriented (100% Over 2.5 and 80% BTTS), but Hwaseong's defense in those matches held a GA of 0.6 and only 20% Over 2.5, which curbs an extremely high score. Consequently, the strongest signal is Under 3.5, which secures the pick under a 2-3 goal forecast and low confidence that the visitors will provide a major goal contribution.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for the Half-Time/Full-Time market points to a victory for Asan, as Hwaseong seasonally averages 0.0 goals scored per match, 0% of points won (PPG 0.0), a 100% loss rate, and a 100% Failed-To-Score record, which severely limits their chances of taking a lead and winning. Asan shows clearly superior performance metrics (PPG 1.67), a lower goals conceded rate (0.67 per match), and a high clean sheet percentage (67%), all supporting the scenario of them leading at the break and securing the result. Furthermore, Asan's post-half-time goal profile is favorable (scored_2hg_avg 1.0 vs conceded_2hg_avg 0.33), so even if the score is level at half-time, the probability of a turnaround in their favor during the second half increases. Simultaneously, Asan's low average first-half goals (0.33) boosts the X/1 variant as a secondary option, but the visitor's offensive weakness makes 1/1 the most probable and strongest pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
9Shots6
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
3Shots on target2
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1.15xG1.08
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
4Corners3
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
50Dangerous attacks75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
12Fouls15
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1Cards1
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
2Goals scored / match1
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
2.33Goals conceded / match0.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
52%Average possession48%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
4Shots on target / match3.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match12.25
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
4Shots on target3.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
18.2%Shot conversion8.2%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
52%Possession48%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1.42xG for1.45
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1.46xG against1.24
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Shooting quality

Asan Mugunghwa: Efficient finishingHwaseong: Balanced
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hwaseong is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.25 pts / match - Hwaseong

Asan Mugunghwa
WLL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Hwaseong
LWDD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1 goals / match - Hwaseong

Hwaseong is 211% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.75 goals / match - Hwaseong

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

6Goals scored (season)4
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
7Goals conceded (season)3
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
4.33Average goals in match1.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
67%2 goals50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
33%3 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
100%2 goals25%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
33%3 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
67%BTTS in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
67%Scored in both halves25%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
100%BTTS - last 525%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 203% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.33 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1 pts / match - Hwaseong

Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing
Hwaseong - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.33Points per match (1st half)1
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
2Average goals (1st half)0.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
33%No goal before half-time75%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)2
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
2.33Average goals (2nd half)1
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%Clean sheet after half-time75%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong
0%No goal after half-time50%
Asan MugunghwaHwaseong

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
1
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hwaseong - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.331.67
Goals scored / match0.71.3
Goals conceded / match1.31.0
Average goals in match2.02.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%100%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal33%0%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 2
Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal75%50%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.87
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Asan MugunghwaLigaHwaseong
Average goals in match 4.333.06 1.75
Both teams scored 100%66% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%63% 25%
Clean sheets 0%20% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%84% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.06
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.59
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-8%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Asan MugunghwaGoalJoon-Young JangAssist: Charles Lokoli Ngoy
  2. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Jong-Min ParkOff: Seong-Woo Park
  3. HwaseongYellow cardJong-Sung Lee
  4. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Jae-Min JegalOff: Leonard Pllana
  5. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardJung-Hyun Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Asan Mugunghwa 0 - 2 - 1 Hwaseong. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Hwaseong FC
2 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
1 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
1 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong?

The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 1:0 Hwaseong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Hwaseong?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 0, Hwaseong won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong?

Asan Mugunghwa score 2.00 goals per game on average and Hwaseong 1.00. The K League 2 average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 25% of Hwaseong's.

What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Hwaseong in?

Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Hwaseong 1-2-1 (1.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong?

The statistical background for Asan Mugunghwa vs Hwaseong — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.