South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Asan Mugunghwa played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Asan Mugunghwa: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.44 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.80 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Asan Mugunghwa 67%, Seoul E-Land 60%. Over 2.5: Asan Mugunghwa 56%, Seoul E-Land 70%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Asan Mugunghwa has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.47. Asan Mugunghwa: 12.2 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 12.3.

Match halves

Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (5 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land are the favorites for this fixture: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that period, while Asan have 1 win and 6 goals in their last 5. Seoul’s key advantage is defense — the visitors concede only 0.8 goals on average away and have 40% clean sheets, whereas Asan concede 1.6 goals at home and have 20% clean sheets. In terms of chance quality, Seoul average 5 on-target shots per away match versus Asan’s 4.2 on-target shots at home and have a higher conversion rate of 15% compared to 14%. However, Asan consistently score at home — averaging 1.8 goals per match and have yet to register a scoreless home game (0% matches without a goal); their home xG is 1.56 versus Seoul’s 1.4 xG away. Considering form (Seoul 2.4 average points in the last 5 vs 1.2 for Asan), superior defense (0.8 vs 1.6) and greater shot quality, I forecast a Seoul victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have BTTS at 60% this season, while the league average BTTS is 63%, which already suggests frequent matches with goals from both sides. xG metrics confirm this: Asan has xG_for 1.53 versus Seoul's xG_against 1.42, and Seoul has xG_for 1.4 versus Asan's xG_against 1.07, meaning both teams generate more expected chances than the opponent's defenses allow. In the last 5 matches Seoul scored 11 goals (avg. 2.2) and conceded 0.8, while Asan scored 6 goals (1.2) and conceded 1.0, highlighting Seoul's particularly strong recent attack and Asan's ability to find the net. Additionally both teams average 5.0 shots on target, and over 2.5 stands at 80% for Asan and 60% for Seoul, with the over2.5 + BTTS combination at 60% for both sides, so I expect the match to feature goals from both teams (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Data indicate a match with an elevated goal expectancy: both teams average 1.8 goals per game this season (3.6 combined), and their xG are 1.53 (Asan) and 1.40 (Seoul), totaling 2.93 xG. Considering defenses that concede 1.07 goals (Asan) and 1.42 goals (Seoul) on average, I project approximately 1.48 expected goals for the home side and 1.24 for the visitors, totalling 2.72 expected goals. Seasonal metrics show Over 2.5 in 80% of Asan’s matches and 60% of Seoul’s matches, and the percentage of games in which both teams scored is 60% for each team, which strengthens the Over signal. In the last 5 matches Seoul scored 11 goals (2.2 avg), Asan 6 goals (1.2 avg), and the total goals in the last five matches involving these teams suggest higher scoring activity than the league (league 2.76 goals per game). Given the projected total of 2.72 goals and the seasonal Over 2.5 rates (80%/60%), I recommend the Over side on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seoul E-Land is in clearly better form: in the last 5 matches they won 4 of 5 (80%) and averaged 2.4 points per match over that period, indicating an ability to close out games. Asan Mugunghwa often starts well on the season — they led at the break in 3 of 5 instances (60%) and at home have 100% of matches with at least one goal in the first half, but in their last 5 matches Asan were trailing at the break in 60% of games, which weakens that signal. Second halves favor the visitors: Seoul scored 3 goals in minutes 76–90, while Asan conceded 3 goals in that interval, and in the last 5 matches visitors averaged 1.6 goals in the second half with a combined +7 goal differential in those second halves. Given Seoul’s 80% efficiency in the last 5 and their stronger game finishes and second-half performance, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a visitors’ victory at full-time (X/2). I estimate the draw at half-time at about 47% and Seoul’s final victory at about 53%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
6Shots15
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
3Shots on target2
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.88xG1.54
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4Corners8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
39Dangerous attacks62
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
16Fouls13
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0Cards2
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.44Goals scored / match1.8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.33Goals conceded / match1
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
53%Average possession50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4.11Shots on target / match5
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.22Shots per match12.3
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4.11Shots on target5
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
11.8%Shot conversion14.6%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
53%Possession50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.55xG for1.47
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.37xG against1.24
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Asan Mugunghwa: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)34%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 2.4 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa
WDDDL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-3
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Seoul E-Land
WWWLW
Season result split
60% W10% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-3
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.8 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Seoul E-Land is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

13Goals scored (season)18
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
12Goals conceded (season)10
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
2.78Average goals in match2.8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal90%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
44%2 goals60%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
22%3 goals30%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal60%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
44%2 goals30%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
11%3 goals10%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time40%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
22%BTTS in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
33%Scored in both halves50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
60%BTTS - last 560%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 91% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.7 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
22% leading22% draw56% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.7
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.3
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
33%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
44%No goal before half-time30%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)1
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
56%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
44%No goal after half-time30%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

33% W56% R11% P
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

50% W30% R20% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Asan MugunghwaLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 2.782.76 2.80
Both teams scored 67%63% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%56% 70%
Clean sheets 22%23% 40%
Goal before half-time 89%78% 80%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Asan MugunghwaGoalJong-Min KimAssist: Joon-Ho Son
  2. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Young-Nam KimOff: Si-hoo Park
  3. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Bo-Kyung ChoiOff: Joon-Young Jang
  4. Asan MugunghwaGoalJong-Min KimAssist: Ju-Sung Kim
  5. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyun KimOff: Jae-Yong Park
  6. Seoul E-LandRed cardJoo-Hyuk Lee
  7. Asan MugunghwaGoalJong-Min Kim
  8. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Ju-hwan KimOff: Oh-Kyu Kim
  9. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Chi-Won ChoiOff: Joon-Ho Son

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Asan Mugunghwa 0 - 1 - 2 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Seoul E-Land FC
4 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
1 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
2 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 3:0 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 0, Seoul E-Land won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

Asan Mugunghwa score 1.44 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.80. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 60% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.