Åsane vs Odd: match statistics
Åsane vs Odd: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Åsane played Odd in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Åsane: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Odd: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Åsane scores 1.30 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Odd scores 2.30 and concedes 1.20. League average: 3.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Åsane 40%, Odd 60%. Over 2.5: Åsane 60%, Odd 80%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Odd has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.36. Åsane: 11.1 shots per match, Odd: 13.7.
Match halves
Åsane: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80. Odd: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Åsane: 76-90+ (5 goals). Odd: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.55 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Odd is the clear favorite on paper: they sit 4th in the table versus Åsane’s 15th, and on the road they have 7 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (win rate 75%), while Åsane at home have 2 wins, 1 draw and 7 losses (win rate 40%). In the last five matches Odd scored 11 goals and have a 3-0-2 record, while Åsane scored 7 goals with a 2-1-2 record; average points in the last five are 1.8 for Odd and 1.4 for Åsane. Defensively the visitors perform better – Odd concede 1.5 goals per away match, whereas Åsane concede 2.2 at home; xG against Odd is 1.27 versus 1.45 for Åsane, and with average possession of 62% for Odd compared to 53% for Åsane the visitors control the game more effectively. Offensively Åsane have strengths (2.2 goals per home game, 5.8 shots on target and a 19% conversion), but their matches are more open (avg. 4.4 goals per match) and 20% of their games end with them failing to score, while Odd have 0% of away games without a goal. Considering league position, away stability (75% wins, 0% goalless away games), lower average goals conceded (1.5 vs 2.2) and 11 goals in the last five, I tip Odd to win (2) and assess probabilities as 55% for the visitors, 25% for a draw and 20% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes based on strong offensive signals: Odd has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and scores on average 2.0 goals away with xG 1.39, while Åsane has BTTS 50% and scores 2.5 goals at home on average with xG 1.82. Additionally, the league records BTTS at 56%, and both teams have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (Åsane 83%, Odd 75%), indicating a large number of goal-scoring situations. The counterpoint is that Åsane has 50% clean sheets this season and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred only 40% of the time, whereas Odd had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 and scored 2.2 goals on average. xG against (Åsane 1.37, Odd 1.27) and average goals conceded in the last 5 matches (Åsane 1.4, Odd 1.6) show both teams create and allow chances, so I ultimately assess the probability of BTTS at 70% (Yes) versus 30% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and statistical analysis indicate a match with elevated goal potential: expected xG is ~1.55 for Åsane (attacking xG 1.82 vs xG conceded 1.27) and 1.38 for Odd (attacking xG 1.39 vs xG conceded 1.37), totaling 2.93 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.93 yields ~79% probability for Over 1.5 goals, ~56% for Over 2.5 and ~34% for Over 3.5, and the league averages 3.55 goals per match, which supports a high-scoring scenario. Seasonal figures corroborate this direction: Åsane have 83% of matches Over 2.5, Odd 75%, and both teams have 100% of matches Over 0.5, indicating consistent finishing. The home side averages 6.17 shots on target versus 4.5 for Odd and scores 2.5 goals per match versus 2.0 for the away team, while both-teams-to-score rate is 50% (Åsane) vs 75% (Odd). Based on xG (2.93) and strong seasonal signals for high-scoring games, I recommend Over 2.5 as the best line to play: a compromise between the model (56% probability) and the teams’ historical profiles (83%/75% Over 2.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Åsane led at half-time in 6 of their matches so far (100%), scoring on average 1.5 goals before the break and conceding only 0.33, while Odd led at half-time in 1 match (25%) and scored on average 0.5 goals by the break. This season Åsane average 2.5 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, whereas Odd average 2.0 scored and 1.5 conceded; additionally Åsane generate higher xG (1.82 vs 1.39) and more shots and shots on target (15.83 and 6.17 vs 10.5 and 4.5), indicating greater offensive control by the home side. The hosts have 11 goals scored by half-time and in 100% of their matches the first half ended with more than 0.5 goals for them (seasonOver05PercentageHT_home 100%), which increases the probability of Åsane leading after 45 minutes. Although Odd have a higher win percentage this season (75% vs 67%) and a higher shot conversion rate (19% vs 16%), their advantage appears to occur more often in the second half (on average 2.5 goals in second halves vs 1.67 for the hosts), therefore the strongest signal from the data is the scenario of Åsane leading at half-time and the hosts winning (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Åsane | Odd | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Odd is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Åsane · 1.8 pts / match - Odd
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Odd is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.3 goals / match - Åsane · 2.3 goals / match - Odd
Odd is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.2 goals / match - Åsane · 1.2 goals / match - Odd
Åsane scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Odd keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
Odd scores in 100% of matches (10 of 10 matches), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Åsane
Over / Under - Odd
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Odd is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Åsane · 2.3 pts / match - Odd
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Åsane - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Odd - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Åsane
Odd
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Åsane | Liga | Odd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.50 | 3.55 | • 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 88% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Åsane 0 - 0 - 2 Odd. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Åsane vs Odd?
The First Division match finished Åsane 2:1 Odd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Åsane and Odd?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Åsane won 0, Odd won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Åsane vs Odd?
Åsane score 1.30 goals per game on average and Odd 2.30. The First Division average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Åsane's matches and 60% of Odd's.
What form are Åsane and Odd in?
Over the last 5 games Åsane have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Odd 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Åsane vs Odd?
The statistical background for Åsane vs Odd — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.