Asante Kotoko vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Asante Kotoko play Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 30 November 2025 at 17:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Asante Kotoko: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Asante Kotoko scores 1.16 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Asante Kotoko 29%, Medeama 53%. Over 2.5: Asante Kotoko 39%, Medeama 47%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Asante Kotoko: 9.7 shots per match, Medeama: 9.5.

Match halves

Asante Kotoko: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Asante Kotoko: 76-90+ (9 goals). Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Asante KotokoMedeama
23Shots9
Asante KotokoMedeama
7Shots on target5
Asante KotokoMedeama
2.36xG1.13
Asante KotokoMedeama
6Corners2
Asante KotokoMedeama
60Dangerous attacks28
Asante KotokoMedeama
15Fouls15
Asante KotokoMedeama
2Cards4
Asante KotokoMedeama

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Asante KotokoMedeama
1.16Goals scored / match1.53
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.87Goals conceded / match0.82
Asante KotokoMedeama
47%Average possession45%
Asante KotokoMedeama
3.87Shots on target / match3.59
Asante KotokoMedeama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match9.5
Asante KotokoMedeama
3.87Shots on target3.59
Asante KotokoMedeama
12%Shot conversion16.1%
Asante KotokoMedeama
47%Possession45%
Asante KotokoMedeama
1.43xG for1.43
Asante KotokoMedeama
1.21xG against1.07
Asante KotokoMedeama

Shooting quality

Asante Kotoko: Counter-attackingMedeama: Counter-attacking
Asante KotokoMedeama
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Asante Kotoko · 1.8 pts / match - Medeama

Asante Kotoko
LLWLL
Season result split
35% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-10
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Asante Kotoko · 1.53 goals / match - Medeama

Medeama is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Asante Kotoko · 0.82 goals / match - Medeama

Asante Kotoko scoring profile: mixed

Asante Kotoko scores in 58% of matches (18 of 31 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Asante Kotoko keeps a clean sheet in 55% (17 of 31 matches).

36Goals scored (season)52
Asante KotokoMedeama
27Goals conceded (season)28
Asante KotokoMedeama
2.03Average goals in match2.35
Asante KotokoMedeama
4Goals scored (last 5)11
Asante KotokoMedeama
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Asante KotokoMedeama

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal82%
Asante KotokoMedeama
32%2 goals44%
Asante KotokoMedeama
13%3 goals15%
Asante KotokoMedeama
6%4 goals9%
Asante KotokoMedeama

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal56%
Asante KotokoMedeama
29%2 goals21%
Asante KotokoMedeama
10%3 goals3%
Asante KotokoMedeama
3%4 goals3%
Asante KotokoMedeama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time18%
Asante KotokoMedeama
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Asante KotokoMedeama
23%Scored in both halves26%
Asante KotokoMedeama

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Asante KotokoMedeama
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Asante KotokoMedeama
40%BTTS - last 560%
Asante KotokoMedeama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Asante KotokoMedeama
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Asante KotokoMedeama
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Asante KotokoMedeama

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Asante KotokoMedeama
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Asante KotokoMedeama
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Asante KotokoMedeama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Asante Kotoko · 1.56 pts / match - Medeama

Asante Kotoko - half-time state
29% leading42% draw29% trailing
Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.56
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.76
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Asante KotokoMedeama
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.15
Asante KotokoMedeama
65%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Asante KotokoMedeama
65%No goal before half-time50%
Asante KotokoMedeama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.65
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Asante KotokoMedeama
0.94Average goals (2nd half)1.21
Asante KotokoMedeama
77%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Asante KotokoMedeama
55%No goal after half-time41%
Asante KotokoMedeama

Asante Kotoko - second-half results

35% W52% R13% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Asante Kotoko - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Asante Kotoko
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
7
31-45
6
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Asante Kotoko

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

Asante KotokoLigaMedeama
Average goals in match 2.032.03 2.35
Both teams scored 29%34% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%34% 47%
Clean sheets 55%41% 44%
Goal before half-time 61%62% 68%
Goal after half-time 55%59% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Asante Kotoko 0 - 0 - 1 Medeama. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Asante Kotoko vs Medeama?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Asante Kotoko 2:2 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Asante Kotoko vs Medeama?

Asante Kotoko score 1.16 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.53. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Asante Kotoko's matches and 53% of Medeama's.

What form are Asante Kotoko and Medeama in?

Over the last 5 games Asante Kotoko have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Medeama 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asante Kotoko vs Medeama?

The statistical background for Asante Kotoko vs Medeama — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.