Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon: match statistics
Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ashdod played Hapoel Katamon in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Ashdod: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Hapoel Katamon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ashdod scores 1.13 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Hapoel Katamon scores 0.81 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ashdod 61%, Hapoel Katamon 52%. Over 2.5: Ashdod 58%, Hapoel Katamon 42%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Ashdod has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.32. Ashdod: 12.0 shots per match, Hapoel Katamon: 11.1.
Match halves
Ashdod: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.65. Hapoel Katamon: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Ashdod: 76-90+ (10 goals). Hapoel Katamon: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2). Hapoel Katamon has averaged 1.4 points in the last 5 matches (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), while Ashdod has only 0.2 points in their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses). Ashdod concede on average 2.33 goals per home match and record just 7% clean sheets at home, with 59 goals conceded overall this season, whereas Hapoel concede 1.31 goals per away match and have 31% clean sheets on the road (41 conceded season-to-date). In attack Ashdod score 1.33 goals at home with 11% conversion and 3.33 shots on target, while Hapoel score 0.88 goals away with 8% conversion and 3.69 shots on target, indicating better offensive efficiency for the hosts but insufficient to offset their defensive issues. Average xG is 1.32 for Ashdod at home vs 1.36 for Hapoel away, and xG against is 1.65 for the home side and 1.8 for the visitors; taking form and defensive advantage into account I assess a 45% probability for an away win, 30% for a draw and 25% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean towards BTTS = Yes, as the league records 55% of matches with both teams scoring, and season rates are 47% for Ashdod and 56% for Hapoel Katamon, yielding a combined edge for both teams to find the net. Both sides have similar xG: 1.29 (Ashdod) vs 1.36 (Katamon), while xG against is high at 1.73 and 1.80 respectively, indicating vulnerability to conceding. Ashdod have conceded 59 goals this season and have averaged 1.8 goals conceded in the last 5 matches (9 conceded), with a clean sheet rate of 33%, so the hosts are prone to goal concessions. Katamon have shown better recent defence (4 conceded in 5, 0.8 avg) and a low recent BTTS of 20%, but they generate more shots and shots on target (11.44 and 3.69 vs 10.73 and 2.87), offering a realistic chance to score. Weighing season-long metrics and form, I assign 62% to 'Yes' and 38% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at approximately 2.61 (1.29 for Ashdod and 1.32 for Hapoel Katamon), based on both teams' xG (Ashdod xG_for 1.29, Katamon xG_for 1.36) and seasonal goals scored/conceded averages (Ashdod 0.73 scored / 1.33 conceded; Katamon 0.88 / 1.31). With a 2.61-goal mean, a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 73% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~48% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Additionally, both teams have high xG_against (Ashdod xG_against 1.73, Katamon xG_against 1.80) and seasonal Over1.5 rates of 60% (Ashdod) and 63% (Katamon), which reinforce the expectation of a minimum of two goals. At the same time, low shot conversion (7% and 8%) and the negative gap between xG and actual goals (e.g., Ashdod xG 1.29 vs 0.73 average goals) limit the probability of a very high-scoring game, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at half-time: Hapoel Katamon have been level at the break in 69% of their matches, while Ashdod have been level at half-time in 80% of their last five fixtures, which gives a strong signal for a half-time draw. After the break the advantage should lie with the visitors — Hapoel score an average of 0.63 goals after half-time versus 0.27 for Ashdod and have a goal after half-time in 69% of matches compared to 53% for the hosts. Additionally, in their last five games Hapoel have won 40% of matches while Ashdod have recorded no wins (0%), suggesting the visitors more often decide games late. Higher xG for Katamon (1.36 vs 1.29) and more average on-target shots 3.69 to 2.87 confirm the superiority of the visitors’ quality of chances. Therefore the most likely scenario is a half-time draw with a Hapoel Katamon victory at full-time (X/2), which I assign the highest probability of 28%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ashdod | Hapoel Katamon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hapoel Katamon is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Ashdod · 1.4 pts / match - Hapoel Katamon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ashdod is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Ashdod · 0.81 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon
Hapoel Katamon is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.9 goals / match - Ashdod · 1.32 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon
Ashdod scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Hapoel Katamon keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 matches).
Hapoel Katamon scores in 65% of matches (20 of 31 matches), while Ashdod keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ashdod
Over / Under - Hapoel Katamon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Katamon is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / match - Ashdod · 1.19 pts / match - Hapoel Katamon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ashdod - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hapoel Katamon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 19%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ashdod
Hapoel Katamon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ashdod | Liga | Hapoel Katamon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 55% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 27% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 66% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ashdod 1 - 0 - 1 Hapoel Katamon. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Ashdod 0:1 Hapoel Katamon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ashdod and Hapoel Katamon?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ashdod won 1, Hapoel Katamon won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon?
Ashdod score 1.13 goals per game on average and Hapoel Katamon 0.81. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Ashdod's matches and 52% of Hapoel Katamon's.
What form are Ashdod and Hapoel Katamon in?
Over the last 5 games Ashdod have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Hapoel Katamon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon?
The statistical background for Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


