ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ASIL Lysi played MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

ASIL Lysi: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

ASIL Lysi scores 0.91 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.42 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ASIL Lysi 45%, MEAP Nisou 67%. Over 2.5: ASIL Lysi 27%, MEAP Nisou 58%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.50. ASIL Lysi: 9.7 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 8.5.

Match halves

ASIL Lysi: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.64. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

ASIL Lysi: 61-75 (3 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
7Shots12
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1Shots on target0
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.96xG1.39
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
2Corners3
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
60Dangerous attacks87
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.91Goals scored / match1.42
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1Goals conceded / match1.67
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
47%Average possession44%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4.36Shots on target / match3.42
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.73Shots per match8.5
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4.36Shots on target3.42
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9.3%Shot conversion16.7%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
47%Possession44%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.5xG for1.65
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.18xG against1.49
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

ASIL Lysi: BalancedMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)45%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ASIL Lysi
LLDWW
Season result split
36% W27% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-4
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
MEAP Nisou
DLWWL
Season result split
42% W17% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MEAP Nisou is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - ASIL Lysi · 1.42 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - ASIL Lysi · 1.67 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi scoring profile: very strong

ASIL Lysi scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: very strong

MEAP Nisou scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while ASIL Lysi keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

10Goals scored (season)17
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
11Goals conceded (season)20
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.91Average goals in match3.08
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4Goals scored (last 5)5
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal83%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
18%2 goals33%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0%3 goals17%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0%4 goals8%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal83%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
18%2 goals50%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9%3 goals25%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0%4 goals8%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time42%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9%Scored in both halves25%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
40%BTTS - last 540%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MEAP Nisou is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - ASIL Lysi · 1.17 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi - half-time state
9% leading73% draw18% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.17
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.83
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.64Average goals (1st half)1.75
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
64%Clean sheet before half-time33%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
73%No goal before half-time42%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.25
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.33
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
55%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
45%No goal after half-time50%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi - second-half results

45% W9% R45% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ASIL Lysi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ASIL Lysi
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ASIL Lysi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ASIL LysiLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals in match 1.912.49 3.08
Both teams scored 45%49% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%44% 58%
Clean sheets 27%30% 17%
Goal before half-time 45%67% 83%
Goal after half-time 91%77% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished ASIL Lysi 0:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

ASIL Lysi score 0.91 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.42. The Second Division average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 45% of ASIL Lysi's matches and 67% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are ASIL Lysi and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games ASIL Lysi have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.