ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie: match statistics
ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
ASO Chlef played JS Kabylie in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed Boumezrag. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
ASO Chlef: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. JS Kabylie: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
ASO Chlef scores 0.89 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. JS Kabylie scores 1.36 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.24 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: ASO Chlef 43%, JS Kabylie 64%. Over 2.5: ASO Chlef 32%, JS Kabylie 43%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
JS Kabylie has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.26. ASO Chlef: 9.7 shots per match, JS Kabylie: 10.1.
Match halves
ASO Chlef: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.54. JS Kabylie: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
ASO Chlef: 46-60 (6 goals). JS Kabylie: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
ASO Chlef holds a clear home advantage driven by superior defensive metrics and quality of chances: at home they concede 0.71 goals per game and record an xG of 1.48, while JS Kabylie concedes 1.07 on the road with an xG of 1.09. The hosts average more attempts (11.79 shots and 5.36 on target per match) compared to the visitors (8.08 and 3.69), which—despite a lower conversion rate (8% vs 11%)—favors ASO due to the higher volume of opportunities. ASO wins 50% of home matches and keeps 50% clean sheets at their stadium, whereas JS wins only 21% of away games and records 21% clean sheets, further increasing the home side’s edge. Trends are mixed—both teams average 1.2 points in their last 5 matches, and JS has scored 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures versus ASO’s 5, highlighting the visitors’ offensive potential and narrowing the gap. Overall, given the hosts’ higher xG (1.48 vs 1.09), better home defence (0.71 vs 1.07) and greater shot volume, I predict an ASO Chlef victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS (Yes) scenario is more likely: ASO Chlef has a seasonal BTTS rate of 71% versus JS Kabylie's 57%, against a league average of 48%, placing both teams clearly above average. In the last 5 matches JS Kabylie recorded BTTS at 100% and ASO Chlef at 60%, with goal averages of 2.0 for JS and 1.0 for ASO and concessions of 1.4 and 1.2 respectively — both sides have recently been both scoring and conceding. xG data shows a similar picture: ASO has xG_for 1.77 and xG_against 1.26, while JS has xG_for 1.09 and xG_against 1.58 — JS’s defense allows a significant number of expected scoring opportunities (1.58). Shot statistics reinforce this signal: ASO averages 6.36 shots on target and 12.79 total shots versus JS’s 3.69 and 8.08, with conversion rates of 14% vs 11%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the 71% vs 57% seasonal BTTS, 100% vs 60% in the last 5, higher xG against and greater shooting activity, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% (Yes) vs 30% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: ASO Chlef has xG_for 1.77 and the opponent’s xG_against 1.58, yielding a projected 1.68 goals for the home side; JS Kabylie has xG_for 1.09 and xG_against_home 1.26, yielding a projected 1.17 goals for the away side, total = 2.85. ASO averages 12.79 shots and 6.36 shots on target with a 14% conversion, while JSK averages 8.08 shots and 3.69 on target with an 11% conversion, so the higher shooting activity from the home team increases the likelihood of goals. Seasonal indicators support this picture: Over 1.5 occurred in 71% of ASO’s matches and 64% of JSK’s; a Poisson model at total xG=2.85 gives roughly a 78% chance of Over 1.5, about 55% for Over 2.5 and about 32% for Over 3.5. Additionally both teams have high BTTS rates: ASO 71% and JSK 57%, and the chance of a clean sheet is only 21% for each side, which further argues for Over and Both Teams To Score. On that basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimate 78%), therefore the recommended play is Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
ASO Chlef holds a clear offensive advantage: their goals per season average is 1.79 versus 0.93 for JS Kabylie, home xG is 1.77 versus 1.09 for the visitors, and the hosts led at the break in 50% of matches (7 occurrences) compared to just 7% for their opponents. At half-time ASO scores on average 0.79 goals, JSK 0.36; the hosts register an average of 6.36 shots on target versus 3.69 for the visitors and have a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%), all supporting a likelihood of ASO leading after 45 minutes. In the second half ASO also dominates — they average 1.0 goal after the break, 79% of their matches feature at least one goal after half-time and they have scored 9 goals in minutes 76–90, so maintaining or extending the lead is probable. JS Kabylie draws frequently (50% of season results are draws and 86% of their matches are level at half-time), therefore an alternative scenario is draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X), but only 21% of away wins reduces the probability of a turnaround. In light of these figures the strongest market signal is the hosts to lead at the break and win the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| ASO Chlef | JS Kabylie | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JS Kabylie is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
0.89 goals / match - ASO Chlef · 1.36 goals / match - JS Kabylie
ASO Chlef is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - ASO Chlef · 1.07 goals / match - JS Kabylie
ASO Chlef scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while JS Kabylie keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).
JS Kabylie scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while ASO Chlef keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ASO Chlef
Over / Under - JS Kabylie
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JS Kabylie is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - ASO Chlef · 1.46 pts / match - JS Kabylie
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ASO Chlef - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JS Kabylie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
ASO Chlef
JS Kabylie
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| ASO Chlef | Liga | JS Kabylie | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.86 | 2.24 | ▲ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 48% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 30% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: ASO Chlef 0 - 0 - 1 JS Kabylie. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?
The Ligue 1 match finished ASO Chlef 1:2 JS Kabylie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?
ASO Chlef score 0.89 goals per game on average and JS Kabylie 1.36. The Ligue 1 average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 43% of ASO Chlef's matches and 64% of JS Kabylie's.
What form are ASO Chlef and JS Kabylie in?
Over the last 5 games ASO Chlef have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and JS Kabylie 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


