Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar: match statistics

Astana crest
Astana
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Astana play Kyzyl-Zhar in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Astana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Astana scores 1.47 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Astana 47%, Kyzyl-Zhar 44%. Over 2.5: Astana 47%, Kyzyl-Zhar 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Astana has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.18. Astana: 15.5 shots per match, Kyzyl-Zhar: 10.0.

Match halves

Astana: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.71. Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Astana: 46-60 (7 goals). Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Astana is the favorite: at home they average 2.25 goals per game, register 7 shots on target and have 59% possession. At home they are unbeaten (0% defeats), have won 75% of matches and boast a +6 goal differential. Kyzyl-Zhar score only 0.33 goals on average away, average 2 shots on target per game, have a shot accuracy rate of 3% and failed to score in 67% of away matches, indicating serious finishing issues. The visitors’ defense away, however, is compact: Kyzyl-Zhar concede only 0.33 goals on average and keep 67% clean sheets, with an average xG against of 1.06, which suggests they can limit actual damage despite chances created. In the last 5 matches the hosts average 1 point per game (form ddwll), while the visitors average 1.8 points per game and have 3 wins in 5 (wwlwl), yet the visitors’ better form does not translate into away efficiency. Considering Astana’s superiority in quality and volume of chances (xG 1.77 and 7 shots on target at home versus the visitors’ xG against 1.06 and 2 shots on target away) and the high percentage of matches where Kyzyl-Zhar fail to score (67%), I tip the home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13Shots9
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6Shots on target5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.51xG1.16
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
5Corners6
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
37Dangerous attacks34
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
9Fouls10
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1Cards4
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.47Goals scored / match1
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.12Goals conceded / match1.44
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
59%Average possession44%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6.18Shots on target / match3.83
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.47Shots per match10
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6.18Shots on target3.83
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
9.5%Shot conversion10%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
59%Possession44%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.75xG for1.18
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.28xG against1.51
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Shooting quality

Astana: DominantKyzyl-Zhar: Balanced
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Astana is 900% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Astana · 0.2 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana
WLDWW
Season result split
47% W29% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-4
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Kyzyl-Zhar
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W22% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-10
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Astana is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Astana · 1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - Astana · 1.44 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana scoring profile: very strong

Astana scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Astana keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

25Goals scored (season)18
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
19Goals conceded (season)26
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
2.59Average goals in match2.44
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
8Goals scored (last 5)3
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal56%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
53%2 goals28%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
18%3 goals11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6%4 goals6%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal78%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
29%2 goals50%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6%3 goals11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6%4 goals6%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6%BTTS in both halves0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
35%Scored in both halves11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
40%BTTS - last 540%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Astana is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / match - Astana · 1.06 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing
Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
11% leading72% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.06
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.28
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.29Average goals (1st half)0.61
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
71%Clean sheet before half-time72%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
47%No goal before half-time78%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)0.89
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)1.11
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.83
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
47%Clean sheet after half-time39%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
47%No goal after half-time56%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Astana - second-half results

29% W47% R24% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

17% W39% R44% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Astana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Astana
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
7
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Astana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AstanaLigaKyzyl-Zhar
Average goals in match 2.592.31 2.44
Both teams scored 47%52% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%42% 50%
Clean sheets 29%29% 22%
Goal before half-time 71%62% 39%
Goal after half-time 71%70% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Astana 1 - 1 - 0 Kyzyl-Zhar. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Astana
3 : 3
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
0 : 2
FK Astana

FAQ

What was the result of Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Astana 2:1 Kyzyl-Zhar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Astana and Kyzyl-Zhar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Astana won 1, Kyzyl-Zhar won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

Astana score 1.47 goals per game on average and Kyzyl-Zhar 1.00. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Astana's matches and 44% of Kyzyl-Zhar's.

What form are Astana and Kyzyl-Zhar in?

Over the last 5 games Astana have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kyzyl-Zhar 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.