Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 23 July 2026

Athletic Carpi vs Ternana: match statistics

Athletic Carpi crest
Athletic Carpi
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Ternana crest
Ternana
135%(3.64)
X40%(3.00)
225%(2.03)

Athletic Carpi presents poor form in the last five matches with just 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak. The hosts have a high draw rate at their own stadium (60%), suggesting a defensive approach. Ternana shows better recent form (1.4 PPG) and more solid defense on the road (0.9 goals conceded on average), but has a very high percentage of away draws (50%) and low scoring efficiency (0.8 goals per match). Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%), indicating similar offensive effectiveness. Considering both teams' tendency to draw and recent results, a share of the points is the most likely scenario, although the hosts hold a slight advantage due to playing in front of their home crowd.

Athletic Carpi vs Ternana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Athletic Carpi play Ternana in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match date is 24 January 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Athletic Carpi: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Ternana: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Athletic Carpi scores 0.97 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Ternana scores 1.22 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Athletic Carpi 47%, Ternana 56%. Over 2.5: Athletic Carpi 36%, Ternana 42%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Ternana has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.43. Athletic Carpi: 12.1 shots per match, Ternana: 12.1.

Match halves

Athletic Carpi: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.53. Ternana: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Athletic Carpi: 76-90+ (10 goals). Ternana: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Athletic Carpi presents poor form in the last five matches with just 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak. The hosts have a high draw rate at their own stadium (60%), suggesting a defensive approach. Ternana shows better recent form (1.4 PPG) and more solid defense on the road (0.9 goals conceded on average), but has a very high percentage of away draws (50%) and low scoring efficiency (0.8 goals per match). Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%), indicating similar offensive effectiveness. Considering both teams' tendency to draw and recent results, a share of the points is the most likely scenario, although the hosts hold a slight advantage due to playing in front of their home crowd.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
Athletic CarpiTernana
7Shots7
Athletic CarpiTernana
2Shots on target1
Athletic CarpiTernana
0.97xG1.17
Athletic CarpiTernana
2Corners5
Athletic CarpiTernana
53Dangerous attacks89
Athletic CarpiTernana
17Fouls16
Athletic CarpiTernana
3Cards4
Athletic CarpiTernana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Athletic CarpiTernana
0.97Goals scored / match1.22
Athletic CarpiTernana
1.33Goals conceded / match1.11
Athletic CarpiTernana
49%Average possession52%
Athletic CarpiTernana
3.42Shots on target / match3.97
Athletic CarpiTernana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.08Shots per match12.14
Athletic CarpiTernana
3.42Shots on target3.97
Athletic CarpiTernana
8%Shot conversion10.1%
Athletic CarpiTernana
49%Possession52%
Athletic CarpiTernana
1.43xG for1.62
Athletic CarpiTernana
1.45xG against1.22
Athletic CarpiTernana

Shooting quality

Athletic Carpi: BalancedTernana: Balanced
Athletic CarpiTernana
Accuracy (shots on target)28%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Athletic Carpi is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Athletic Carpi · 1 pts / match - Ternana

Athletic Carpi
LWLLW
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-16
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Ternana
DLDWL
Season result split
39% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-11
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ternana is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Athletic Carpi · 1.22 goals / match - Ternana

Ternana is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Athletic Carpi · 1.11 goals / match - Ternana

Athletic Carpi scoring profile: strong

Athletic Carpi scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Ternana scoring profile: very strong

Ternana scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Athletic Carpi keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

35Goals scored (season)44
Athletic CarpiTernana
48Goals conceded (season)40
Athletic CarpiTernana
2.31Average goals in match2.33
Athletic CarpiTernana
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Athletic CarpiTernana
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Athletic CarpiTernana

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
Athletic CarpiTernana
25%2 goals42%
Athletic CarpiTernana
6%3 goals6%
Athletic CarpiTernana
0%4 goals0%
Athletic CarpiTernana

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal75%
Athletic CarpiTernana
39%2 goals25%
Athletic CarpiTernana
14%3 goals8%
Athletic CarpiTernana
3%4 goals3%
Athletic CarpiTernana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time22%
Athletic CarpiTernana
8%BTTS in both halves6%
Athletic CarpiTernana
14%Scored in both halves36%
Athletic CarpiTernana

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Athletic CarpiTernana
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Athletic CarpiTernana
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Athletic CarpiTernana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Athletic CarpiTernana
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Athletic CarpiTernana
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Athletic CarpiTernana

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Athletic CarpiTernana
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Athletic CarpiTernana
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Athletic CarpiTernana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ternana is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Athletic Carpi · 1.28 pts / match - Ternana

Athletic Carpi - half-time state
19% leading42% draw39% trailing
Ternana - half-time state
25% leading53% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.28
Athletic CarpiTernana
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Athletic CarpiTernana
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Athletic CarpiTernana
1.08Average goals (1st half)1
Athletic CarpiTernana
47%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Athletic CarpiTernana
67%No goal before half-time53%
Athletic CarpiTernana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Athletic CarpiTernana
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Athletic CarpiTernana
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Athletic CarpiTernana
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Athletic CarpiTernana
42%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Athletic CarpiTernana
53%No goal after half-time36%
Athletic CarpiTernana

Athletic Carpi - second-half results

17% W56% R28% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ternana - second-half results

39% W33% R28% P
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Athletic Carpi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ternana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Athletic Carpi
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
6
11
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
7
11
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ternana
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
8
46-60
10
6
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Athletic Carpi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Ternana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

Athletic CarpiLigaTernana
Average goals in match 2.312.26 2.33
Both teams scored 47%49% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%39% 42%
Clean sheets 22%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%63% 64%
Goal after half-time 72%72% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Athletic Carpi 0 - 0 - 1 Ternana. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ternana
2 : 0
Athletic Carpi

FAQ

What was the result of Athletic Carpi vs Ternana?

The Serie C Group B match finished Athletic Carpi 0:1 Ternana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Carpi vs Ternana?

Athletic Carpi score 0.97 goals per game on average and Ternana 1.22. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Athletic Carpi's matches and 56% of Ternana's.

What form are Athletic Carpi and Ternana in?

Over the last 5 games Athletic Carpi have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ternana 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Carpi vs Ternana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.