Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna: match statistics
Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Athletic Club Bilbao played CA Osasuna in La Liga (Spain). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Athletic Club Bilbao: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. CA Osasuna: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Athletic Club Bilbao scores 1.06 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. CA Osasuna scores 1.19 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Athletic Club Bilbao 52%, CA Osasuna 52%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club Bilbao 48%, CA Osasuna 45%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Athletic Club Bilbao has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.31. Athletic Club Bilbao: 14.0 shots per match, CA Osasuna: 11.4.
Match halves
Athletic Club Bilbao: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.58. CA Osasuna: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Athletic Club Bilbao: 76-90+ (10 goals). CA Osasuna: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
La Liga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bilbao has the edge in quality of attacking situations: average xG at home is 1.71, while Osasuna averages 1.05 xG away. The hosts average 14.88 shots and 4.94 on target per home match versus Osasuna’s 9.06 shots and 2.5 on target away, translating to 1.25 goals per game for Athletic compared to only 0.69 goals for Osasuna on the road. In the last 5 fixtures Athletic scored 3 goals, recorded 1 win and 4 losses (0.6 points per game), while Osasuna scored 7 goals, with 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per game). Defensively the hosts concede 1.19 goals per home match, and Osasuna concedes 1.31 goals away; in the last 5 matches Athletic conceded 9 goals, Osasuna 8. Considering the superior xG (1.71 vs 1.05), a much lower share of clean-sheet-less games for the hosts (25% vs 63%) and the advantage in shots and accuracy, I expect an Athletic win (55%); a draw is 25% and an Osasuna win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis indicates a stronger BTTS - Yes scenario (65%) versus No (35%). Athletic at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%, scores on average 1.73 goals per match with xG 1.59 and records 5.07 shots on target (conversion rate 12%), while conceding 1.13 goals, meaning the hosts regularly create and allow scoring chances. Osasuna’s season scoring average is weak at 0.69 and they have 63% of away matches without a goal, yet in the last 5 matches the visitors have BTTS 80%, scoring 1.4 goals on average and generating xG 1.81, indicating an improvement in offense. Additionally, Athletic has conceded 1.8 goals on average in the last 5 (9 conceded), whereas Osasuna scored 7 goals over the same period, so the visitors have a realistic chance to score. Considering Athletic’s 67% home BTTS, the league-level BTTS of 56% and Osasuna’s last-5 form, the Yes scenario appears strongest.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Considering xG, Athletic has 1.59 xG per match with 1.27 xG conceded, while Osasuna has 1.05 xG per match with 1.65 xG conceded; averaging these values yields expected goals of 1.57 for Athletic and 1.04 for Osasuna (total 2.61). Additionally, Athletic averages 14.0 shots and 5.07 shots on target per match with a conversion rate of 12%, versus 9.06 shots and 2.5 shots on target (8% conversion) for Osasuna, which reinforces the home side’s offensive edge. Season-to-date Athletic has had 87% of matches over 1.5 goals, while Osasuna 50%; both teams recorded 60% of matches over 2.5 in their last 5 games, so there is a strong signal toward the lower over line. Given the expected 2.61 goals and seasonal percentages (home over2.5 53% vs away 38%), the Over 1.5 line is the safest (high probability ~85%), whereas Over 2.5 is moderately likely (57%), and Over 3.5 has low chances (28%) due to season rates of 33%/25% for home and away.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select 1/1 (home team leads at the break and wins) as the most likely scenario. Athletic led at half-time in 9 home matches, representing 60% of their home fixtures, and they average 1.0 goal in the first half versus 0.25 for Osasuna, so the lead at the break is pronounced. Over the full match the hosts score 1.73 goals on average and have an xG of 1.59 with 5.07 shots on target, while Osasuna records 0.69 goals per game, xG 1.05 and 2.5 shots on target, indicating a clear attacking advantage for Bilbao. Additionally, Athletic win at home in 53% of cases, while Osasuna win only 13% of away matches; opponents generate on average 1.65 xG against them, which increases the probability that the hosts will maintain their lead through to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Club Bilbao | CA Osasuna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CA Osasuna is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Athletic Club Bilbao · 1.2 pts / match - CA Osasuna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA Osasuna is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Athletic Club Bilbao · 1.19 goals / match - CA Osasuna
CA Osasuna is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Athletic Club Bilbao · 1.23 goals / match - CA Osasuna
Athletic Club Bilbao scores in 65% of matches (20 of 31 matches), while CA Osasuna keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 31 matches).
CA Osasuna scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Athletic Club Bilbao keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Athletic Club Bilbao
Over / Under - CA Osasuna
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CA Osasuna is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Athletic Club Bilbao · 1.65 pts / match - CA Osasuna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Club Bilbao - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CA Osasuna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Athletic Club Bilbao
CA Osasuna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (La Liga).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Club Bilbao | Liga | CA Osasuna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.52 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 56% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 51% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 24% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 69% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Athletic Club BilbaoSubstitutionOn: Daniel Vivian MorenoOff: Aymeric Jean Louis Gérard Alphonse Laporte
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Athletic Club Bilbao 0 - 1 - 0 CA Osasuna. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna?
The La Liga match finished Athletic Club Bilbao 1:0 CA Osasuna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna?
Athletic Club Bilbao score 1.06 goals per game on average and CA Osasuna 1.19. The La Liga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Athletic Club Bilbao's matches and 52% of CA Osasuna's.
What form are Athletic Club Bilbao and CA Osasuna in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Club Bilbao have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and CA Osasuna 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna?
The statistical background for Athletic Club Bilbao vs CA Osasuna — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


