Athletic Club vs CRB: match statistics
Athletic Club vs CRB: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Athletic Club played CRB in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 20 August 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Athletic Club: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. CRB: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Athletic Club scores 1.09 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. CRB scores 1.45 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Athletic Club 59%, CRB 55%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club 27%, CRB 55%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots and style
CRB has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.23. Athletic Club: 11.6 shots per match, CRB: 17.4.
Match halves
Athletic Club: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.64. CRB: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Athletic Club: 61-75 (6 goals). CRB: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CRB are showing a clearly stronger current run of form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 3, while Athletic have recorded 2 wins and 3 draws in their last five games. However, the hosts are very difficult to beat at home, losing just 18% of their matches and conceding an average of 0.64 goals per game, compared with CRB’s 1.64 goals conceded away from home. Athletic create chances worth an average of 1.48 xG on their own ground, while CRB allow opponents 1.76 xG away from home, giving the hosts an attacking edge. The visitors register more shots on target away from home—5.36 compared with Athletic’s 4.00 at home—but their negative away goal difference (-4) undermines the credibility of backing them to win. With Athletic drawing 36% of their home matches and both defences showing good form over the last five rounds, a share of the points appears the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are elevated, standing at 60% for Athletic Club and 55% for CRB, but recent form clearly weakens this signal: in both cases, only 40% of the last five matches saw both teams score. Athletic Club conceded just 0.4 goals per game during this period, keeping a clean sheet in 3 of 5 matches, which makes it difficult for CRB to capitalize on their own average of 1.6 goals scored. The hosts have also managed only 1.0 goal per game across their last five fixtures, while their xG has fallen to 1.05 compared with 2.13 for the season as a whole. CRB are in good form and create an average of 1.79 xG, but Athletic's defensive strength and the hosts' lower current attacking efficiency slightly increase the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score. Therefore, BTTS - No is marginally preferred, meaning that at least one team is expected to draw a blank; this does not automatically imply a 0:0 scoreline or that neither team will score, despite the season-long data for both sides being more goal-oriented.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The Under 3.5 goals scenario is favored, as Athletic have scored 5 goals and conceded only 2 in their last five matches, while CRB have recorded an 8:3 goal difference. Athletic do have a season average of 1.8 goals scored, but their current average has dropped to 1.0, and only 20% of their last five matches went Over 2.5 goals. CRB are in better attacking form, averaging 1.6 goals over their last five matches, but they have also conceded just 0.6 goals per game during this period. On a season-long basis, matches involving both teams finished Under 3.5 goals in 60% and 64% of cases, respectively, and neither side has a high frequency of scoring at least three goals on their own. The combined projected total of 2.32 goals points to a realistic chance of two or three goals, but clearly limits the likelihood of a four-goal game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CRB are showing significantly better current form: they have won 80% of their last five matches and remain unbeaten in that run, while Athletic have won 40% and drawn 60% of their games. The visitors were leading at the break in as many as 80% of those matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before half-time, whereas the hosts opened the scoring in only 20% of their games and averaged 0.4 goals in the first half. Athletic do have stronger season-long attacking metrics, with an xG of 2.13 compared with CRB’s 1.52 and 21.1 shots per match compared with 13.73, but they have recently been scoring just 1.0 goal per game. The most likely HT/FT scenario is CRB leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage, as the visitors conceded only 0.6 goals per match across their last five games, while Athletic have not lost any match after the break, although as many as 60% of their games ended in a draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Club | CRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CRB is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Athletic Club · 2.6 pts / match - CRB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CRB is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.09 goals / match - Athletic Club · 1.45 goals / match - CRB
Athletic Club is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.86 goals / match - Athletic Club · 1.45 goals / match - CRB
Athletic Club scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while CRB keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
CRB scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Athletic Club keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Athletic Club
Over / Under - CRB
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CRB is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Athletic Club · 1.73 pts / match - CRB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Club - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CRB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Athletic Club
CRB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Club | Liga | CRB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.95 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 48% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 40% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 31% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 65% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 73% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Athletic Club 1 - 0 - 2 CRB. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Club vs CRB?
The Serie B match finished Athletic Club 0:2 CRB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Athletic Club and CRB?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Athletic Club won 1, CRB won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club vs CRB?
Athletic Club score 1.09 goals per game on average and CRB 1.45. The Serie B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Athletic Club's matches and 55% of CRB's.
What form are Athletic Club and CRB in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Club have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and CRB 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club vs CRB?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Athletic Club vs CRB: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


