Brazil - Serie BData current as of 20 September 2026

Athletic Club vs Criciúma: match statistics

Athletic Club crest
Athletic Club
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Criciúma crest
Criciúma

Athletic Club vs Criciúma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Athletic Club played Criciúma in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Athletic Club: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Criciúma: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Athletic Club scores 0.95 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Criciúma scores 1.15 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Athletic Club 60%, Criciúma 45%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club 25%, Criciúma 20%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Criciúma has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.23. Athletic Club: 11.7 shots per match, Criciúma: 13.6.

Match halves

Athletic Club: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.55. Criciúma: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Athletic Club: 61-75 (5 goals). Criciúma: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Criciúma lead the table, having collected 40 points from 11 wins and losing just 2 of their 20 matches, while Athletic have recorded 6 wins and as many as 10 draws. The visitors are clearly in better form: they have won 4 of their last five matches, drawn once and conceded just 1 goal, whereas Athletic have scored only 3 goals during this period. At home, however, the hosts create quality chances, with an average xG of 1.54 compared with Criciúma’s 1.23 away from home, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. Athletic score only 0.9 goals per home match and fail to find the net in 30% of such fixtures, while Criciúma keep a clean sheet in 40% of their away games. With both teams showing similar defensive numbers—conceding an average of 0.7 goals at home and 0.8 away—Criciúma’s current efficiency and winning run point to a narrow victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which one team fails to score is strongly supported by recent form, as Athletic have scored just 3 goals in 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game. Over the same period, Criciúma have conceded only 1 goal, an average of 0.2, while both teams recorded BTTS - Yes in just 40% and 20% of their last five appearances, respectively. Across the season, the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 60% of matches, compared with 40% for the visitors, further increasing the likelihood of at least one side failing to score. Although Athletic create chances worth 1.68 xG at home, their shot conversion rate is only 8%, and their current goal output is poor. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is not more likely than the outcome in which at least one team finishes the match without scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly points to a low-scoring outcome: Athletic Club concede an average of just 0.4 goals at home, while Criciúma concede 0.8 away from home. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored 3 and conceded 3 goals, whereas the visitors have scored 6 and allowed just 1 goal. The 3.5-goal line has not been surpassed in 90% of the league matches involving either team, while Over 2.5 goals has landed in only 20% of their combined last five fixtures. Athletic Club keep a clean sheet in 60% of their home matches, while Criciúma do so in 40% of their away games, further reducing the likelihood of an open match. Although the hosts’ xG stands at 1.68, their current output is just 0.6 goals per match across their last five appearances, making Under 3.5 the market best supported by the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Criciúma win, as Athletic have been level at the break in 80% of their last five matches and scored only 0.2 goals per game in those fixtures. Criciúma are in considerably better late-match form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, remain unbeaten, average 1.2 goals scored and concede just 0.2. The visitors are particularly solid in the opening stages, having conceded no goals before half-time in their last five outings and led at the break in 60% of them. Athletic do have home advantage and remain unbeaten at home throughout the season, but their current tally is only 1.2 points per game compared with Criciúma’s 2.6. After the break, both teams often adopt a cautious approach, but the hosts average just 0.4 goals in the second half across their last five matches, reinforcing the scenario in which the visitors turn around an evenly matched contest in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Athletic ClubCriciúma
8Shots15
Athletic ClubCriciúma
2Shots on target2
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.9xG1.52
Athletic ClubCriciúma
5Corners6
Athletic ClubCriciúma
35Dangerous attacks60
Athletic ClubCriciúma
14Fouls9
Athletic ClubCriciúma
2Cards2
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.95Goals scored / match1.15
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.9Goals conceded / match0.6
Athletic ClubCriciúma
44%Average possession52%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
3.3Shots on target / match3.7
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.7Shots per match13.6
Athletic ClubCriciúma
3.3Shots on target3.7
Athletic ClubCriciúma
8.1%Shot conversion8.5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
44%Possession52%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
1.23xG for1.45
Athletic ClubCriciúma
1.59xG against1.31
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Shooting quality

Athletic Club: BalancedCriciúma: Balanced
Athletic ClubCriciúma
Accuracy (shots on target)28%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Criciúma is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Athletic Club · 2.6 pts / match - Criciúma

Athletic Club
LDDWD
Season result split
30% W50% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Criciúma
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W35% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Criciúma is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Athletic Club · 1.15 goals / match - Criciúma

Criciúma is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Athletic Club · 0.6 goals / match - Criciúma

Athletic Club scoring profile: mixed

Athletic Club scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Criciúma keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

Criciúma scoring profile: very strong

Criciúma scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Athletic Club keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

19Goals scored (season)23
Athletic ClubCriciúma
18Goals conceded (season)12
Athletic ClubCriciúma
1.85Average goals in match1.75
Athletic ClubCriciúma
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Athletic ClubCriciúma
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Athletic ClubCriciúma

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal85%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
20%2 goals25%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
5%3 goals5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0%4 goals0%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal50%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
15%2 goals5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0%3 goals5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0%4 goals0%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
10%Scored in both halves25%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
40%BTTS - last 520%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Criciúma is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Athletic Club · 1.85 pts / match - Criciúma

Athletic Club - half-time state
25% leading60% draw15% trailing
Criciúma - half-time state
50% leading35% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.85
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.75Average goals (1st half)0.8
Athletic ClubCriciúma
70%Clean sheet before half-time85%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
65%No goal before half-time45%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Athletic ClubCriciúma
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Athletic ClubCriciúma
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.95
Athletic ClubCriciúma
50%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Athletic ClubCriciúma
55%No goal after half-time45%
Athletic ClubCriciúma

Athletic Club - second-half results

30% W35% D35% L
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Criciúma - second-half results

25% W65% D10% L
37
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Athletic Club - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Criciúma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Athletic Club
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Criciúma
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Athletic Club

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Criciúma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

Athletic ClubLigaCriciúma
Average goals in match 1.852.31 1.75
Both teams scored 60%49% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%42% 20%
Clean sheets 25%31% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%66% 65%
Goal after half-time 80%75% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Athletic ClubYellow cardJose Carlos Cracco Neto
  2. CriciúmaYellow cardEduardo Jacinto de Biasi
  3. Athletic ClubSubstitutionOn: Diogo Batista de SouzaOff: Jose Carlos Cracco Neto
  4. Athletic ClubGoalWilinton Aponzá CarabaliAssist: Dixon Vera
  5. Athletic ClubYellow cardDiogo Batista de Souza
  6. CriciúmaYellow cardJose Romario Silva de Souza
  7. CriciúmaSubstitutionOn: Diego GonçalvesOff: Fellipe Mateus De Sena Araujo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Athletic Club 0 - 2 - 1 Criciúma. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Criciúma
1 : 1
Athletic Club
Athletic Club (Minas Gerais)
1 : 1
Criciuma EC
Criciuma EC
4 : 0
Athletic Club (Minas Gerais)

FAQ

What was the result of Athletic Club vs Criciúma?

The Serie B match finished Athletic Club 2:0 Criciúma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Athletic Club and Criciúma?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Athletic Club won 0, Criciúma won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club vs Criciúma?

Athletic Club score 0.95 goals per game on average and Criciúma 1.15. The Serie B average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Athletic Club's matches and 45% of Criciúma's.

What form are Athletic Club and Criciúma in?

Over the last 5 games Athletic Club have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Criciúma 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club vs Criciúma?

The statistical background for Athletic Club vs Criciúma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.