United States - MLSMercedes-Benz StadiumData current as of 22 October 2026

Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City: match statistics

Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Atlanta United FC played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 September 2026. Venue: Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Atlanta United FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Orlando City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Atlanta United FC scores 1.17 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. Orlando City scores 1.65 and concedes 2.35. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Atlanta United FC 65%, Orlando City 65%. Over 2.5: Atlanta United FC 61%, Orlando City 70%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Orlando City has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.38. Atlanta United FC: 12.7 shots per match, Orlando City: 12.2.

Match halves

Atlanta United FC: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74. Orlando City: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Atlanta United FC: 31-45+ (6 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Atlanta United come into this match after recording 3 wins in their last 5 games, while Orlando City have won just once and drawn three times during the same period. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.41, whereas Orlando allow opponents an xG of 2.09 away from home and concede as many as 3.36 goals per match. Although Orlando score 1.64 goals per away game and have a 15% shot conversion rate, their defense is a clear weakness: they have lost 64% of their away matches, with just 18% wins. Atlanta average 54% possession at home and take 13.09 shots per game, which should allow them to exploit the visitors' defensive weaknesses. Both teams have conceded 8 goals in their last five matches, so Orlando have a case for scoring, but the hosts are more likely to claim all three points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strong, as Atlanta have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches, while Orlando have seen this scenario in 100% of their last five games. Atlanta average 1.73 goals at home, whereas Orlando concede as many as 3.36 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 9% of their outings. The visitors also have solid grounds to score: they average 1.64 goals, register 5.0 shots on target per match, and Atlanta allow opponents an xG of 1.69. Current form also supports the BTTS - Yes pick, with both teams scoring an average of 1.6 and 1.8 goals respectively in their last five matches, while conceding 1.6 and 1.8 goals. The main risk is that Orlando have failed to score in 36% of their matches this season, but the defensive weaknesses of both teams and the league’s high average of 3.19 goals clearly tilt the prediction towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Atlanta scores an average of 1.73 goals per match, while Orlando concedes as many as 3.36, which clearly boosts the home side’s projected goal tally. Neither defense keeps clean sheets regularly, with both Atlanta and Orlando doing so in only 9% of matches. In their last five games, both teams played matches averaging 3.2 goals, and the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 80% of cases for each side. Over the course of the season, at least two goals were scored in 82% of Atlanta’s matches and in all of Orlando’s matches, making Over 1.5 goals the most stable choice. Additionally, the average xG against their opponents stands at 1.69 for Atlanta and 2.09 for Orlando, supporting a scenario with at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Atlanta have a clear advantage in full-match results, winning 45% of their games compared with Orlando’s mere 18% win rate, while Orlando have lost as many as 64% of their fixtures. The key factor supporting the scenario of the home side taking the lead at the break is the visitors’ defensive record: they concede an average of 1.64 goals before half-time, whereas Atlanta score 0.73 goals in this phase and keep a clean sheet in 45% of first halves. In their last five matches, Atlanta were ahead at half-time in 60% of cases, while Orlando were trailing at the break in 60%, strongly supporting the 1/1 outcome. After the interval, the visitors remain vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.73 goals, while their season-long average stands at as many as 3.36 goals conceded per match. Orlando are capable of responding offensively, but the difference in average points—1.55 for Atlanta versus 0.73 for their opponents—favours the home side maintaining their lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
15Shots14
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
2Shots on target7
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.36xG1.71
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
5Corners5
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
36Dangerous attacks46
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
9Fouls9
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1Cards2
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.17Goals scored / match1.65
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.74Goals conceded / match2.35
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
51%Average possession48%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
4.09Shots on target / match4.87
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.7Shots per match12.17
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
4.09Shots on target4.87
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
9.2%Shot conversion13.6%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
51%Possession48%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.38xG for1.4
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.42xG against1.85
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Shooting quality

Atlanta United FC: BalancedOrlando City: Efficient finishing
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)32%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Atlanta United FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Atlanta United FC · 1.6 pts / match - Orlando City

Atlanta United FC
WWWLD
Season result split
26% W17% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Orlando City
DLWDW
Season result split
35% W17% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-11
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Orlando City is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Atlanta United FC · 1.65 goals / match - Orlando City

Atlanta United FC is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.74 goals / match - Atlanta United FC · 2.35 goals / match - Orlando City

Atlanta United FC scoring profile: very strong

Atlanta United FC scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

Orlando City scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Atlanta United FC keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).

27Goals scored (season)38
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
40Goals conceded (season)54
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
2.91Average goals in match4
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal78%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
43%2 goals48%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
9%3 goals22%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0%4 goals17%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal87%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
57%2 goals57%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
17%3 goals43%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
4%4 goals22%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
Atlanta United FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 23 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time17%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
26%Scored in both halves26%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
80%BTTS - last 580%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Orlando City is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Atlanta United FC · 1.22 pts / match - Orlando City

Atlanta United FC - half-time state
26% leading30% draw43% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
35% leading17% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.22
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.74
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
52%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
65%No goal before half-time52%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)1.22
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)1
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.26
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
1.74Average goals (2nd half)2.26
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
39%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City
43%No goal after half-time43%
Atlanta United FCOrlando City

Atlanta United FC - second-half results

35% W17% D48% L
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Orlando City - second-half results

35% W17% D48% L
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Atlanta United FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Atlanta United FC
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
8
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
11
9
16-30
2
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
8
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Atlanta United FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Atlanta United FCLigaOrlando City
Average goals in match▼ 2.913.21▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▲ 65%63%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 61%62%▲ 70%
Clean sheets▼ 4%21%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▼ 70%77%▲ 87%
Goal after half-time▲ 87%81%▲ 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityGoalDavid Brekalo
  2. Orlando CityGoalAntoine GriezmannAssist: Joran Gerbet
  3. Orlando CityYellow cardDavid Brekalo
  4. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Zakaria TaifiOff: Griffin Dorsey
  5. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Adrian Simons GillOff: Ajani Fortune
  6. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Luke BrennanOff: Tristan Muyumba Nkita
  7. Atlanta United FCYellow cardTomás Jacob
  8. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Tyrese SpicerOff: Bernardo Rhein Goncalves
  9. Orlando CityGoalAntoine GriezmannAssist: Justin Ellis
  10. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Iago Teodoro da Silva NogueiraOff: David Brekalo
  11. Orlando CityYellow cardJustin Ellis
  12. Orlando CityGoalTyrese Spicer

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Atlanta United FC 0 - 1 - 0 Orlando City. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished Atlanta United FC 2:3 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City?

Atlanta United FC score 1.17 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.65. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Atlanta United FC's matches and 65% of Orlando City's.

What form are Atlanta United FC and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games Atlanta United FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Orlando City 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Atlanta United FC vs Orlando City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.