Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Atlanta United II played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 6 June 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Atlanta United II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Atlanta United II scores 1.91 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.27 and concedes 1.45. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Atlanta United II 55%, Chicago Fire II 64%. Over 2.5: Atlanta United II 64%, Chicago Fire II 73%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Atlanta United II has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.55. Atlanta United II: 15.4 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 12.9.
Match halves
Atlanta United II: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 1.09. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Atlanta United II: 76-90+ (5 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Atlanta United II holds a clear statistical advantage: they sit 9th in the table versus Chicago Fire II in 22nd, average 2.00 goals per home game and win 67% of home matches. The hosts create more high-quality chances — 5.67 shots on target per game and a 14% shot-to-goal conversion, while visitors average 4.4 shots on target away with only 6% efficiency; average xG is 1.61 for Atlanta vs. 1.47 for Chicago. Defensively both teams are vulnerable: Atlanta concedes 1.33 goals at home, Chicago 1.4 away, and the hosts have no clean sheets at home (0% CS), indicating an open game with a higher goal count (home total average 3.33). Form further supports the hosts — Atlanta have won 3 of their last 5 and average 1.8 points per game in that period, while Chicago have 2 wins in their last 5 and 1.2 points per game, which additionally favors a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes (75% vs 25%) because both seasonal and recent form strongly favor goals from both sides. Chicago Fire II have a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% versus Atlanta’s 50%, and in the last 5 matches BTTS was 80% for Chicago and 60% for Atlanta; the league average BTTS is 62%. Although visitors average 0.8 goals seasonally, in the last 5 matches they averaged 2.0 goals, hosts 2.4, and xG is 1.63 (hosts) vs 1.47 (guests), indicating both sides create clear scoring opportunities. On-target shots 3.17 vs 4.4, low clean sheet probability (33% and 20%) and seasonal goals conceded averages 1.5 vs 1.4 (last 5: 1.4 vs 1.8) all suggest a high likelihood that both teams will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates high goal potential: Atlanta averages 1.67 goals per match with xG 1.63, while Chicago has xG 1.47 despite a seasonal goals-scored average of only 0.80. This season Atlanta’s matches exceeded the 1.5 line in 83% of cases and Chicago in 80%; in the last 5 fixtures the share of matches over 2.5 was 80% for Atlanta and 100% for Chicago, which strongly favors overs. Based on xG and averages I project about 1.60 goals for Atlanta (xG 1.63 and seasonal 1.67) and 1.35 for Chicago (xG 1.47, but low finishing 6% and seasonal 0.80 reduce expectations), yielding a total of ~2.95 goals. Additionally, Atlanta has a higher shot conversion (13% vs 6%) with a similar shot volume (12.83 vs 13.0), while Chicago registers more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.17) — together these suggest a goalscoring match, with the hosts more efficient at converting chances. Consequently I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest pick (strong seasonal signal 83%/80%, implied probability ~90%), Over 2.5 also has solid backing (~75%), whereas Over 3.5 is less certain (~45%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (home team leads at the break and wins) because Atlanta United II led at the break in 50% of their home matches, with an average of 1.17 first-half goals versus 0.4 for Chicago Fire II. Over the full match, the home side average 1.67 goals per game compared to 0.8 for the visitors, and a 50% home win rate versus a 0% away win rate for the visitors gives Atlanta a clear advantage. xG slightly favors the hosts as well (1.63 xG vs 1.47 xG), and Atlanta converts shots to goals more efficiently (13% vs 6%), increasing the likelihood they maintain a lead at the break through to Full-Time. Additionally, 83% of Atlanta’s home games featured at least one goal by Half-Time and 67% had over 1.5 first-half goals, so a lead at the break for the hosts is common; thus there is a 42% probability for 1/1 as the strongest signal, with other notable options being X/X (15%) and X/1 (13%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Atlanta United II | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Atlanta United II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Atlanta United II · 1.2 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Atlanta United II is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.91 goals / match - Atlanta United II · 1.27 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Atlanta United II is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Atlanta United II · 1.45 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Atlanta United II scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
Chicago Fire II scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Atlanta United II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlanta United II
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Atlanta United II is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.82 pts / match - Atlanta United II · 1.55 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlanta United II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Atlanta United II
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Atlanta United II | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.27 | 3.21 | ▼ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 64% | 65% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 22% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Atlanta United II 2 - 0 - 0 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Atlanta United II 3:0 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Atlanta United II won 2, Chicago Fire II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
Atlanta United II score 1.91 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.27. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Atlanta United II's matches and 64% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Atlanta United II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


