Atlético GO vs CRB: match statistics
Atlético GO vs CRB: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Atlético GO played CRB in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 12 June 2026. Venue: Estádio Antônio Accioly. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Atlético GO: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CRB: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Atlético GO scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. CRB scores 1.58 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Atlético GO 67%, CRB 67%. Over 2.5: Atlético GO 42%, CRB 67%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
CRB has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.44. Atlético GO: 13.6 shots per match, CRB: 17.9.
Match halves
Atlético GO: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.42. CRB: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Atlético GO: 16-30 (4 goals). CRB: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win. Atlético GO at home generates on average xG 1.70 with xG conceded 0.94, while CRB away posts xG 1.59 and xG conceded 1.47, yielding an estimated xG balance of roughly 1.6–1.3 in favor of Atlético. The hosts concede on average 1.00 goal at home versus 1.67 conceded by CRB on the road, and season totals are 12 scored and 12 conceded for Atlético compared to 19 scored and 20 conceded for CRB, indicating superior defensive organization from the hosts. CRB is, however, more efficient in finishing — averaging 6 shots on target away versus 4.83 for Atlético, with a shot conversion rate of 10% versus 6% for the hosts and a lower share of matches without a goal (17% vs 33%), so the visitors exploit chances more easily. Considering Atlético’s higher xG and stronger defense but CRB’s better efficiency, I assign the hosts a 45% probability of victory, a 30% draw probability and 25% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis strongly indicates BTTS: CRB has a seasonal Both Teams To Score rate of 83%, while Atlético GO has 50%, giving a clear edge to the both-teams-to-score scenario. Both sides concede an average of 1.67 goals per match; Atlético GO scores 1.83 goals per match (xG 2.26), and CRB scores 1.33 goals per match (xG 1.59), so statistically both teams generate chances. Defensively the situation favors conceding: CRB has 0% clean sheets this season, and Atlético GO only 17% of matches without conceding, which significantly reduces the likelihood of a no-goal-against match. Both teams have 67% of matches over 2.5 goals, and the over2.5 + BTTS combination occurs for the home side in 50% and for the away side in 67%; in the last 5 rounds BTTS for both teams is 60% each, confirming the trend. Considering 83% vs 50% BTTS, 0% clean sheets for CRB, xG 2.26 vs 1.59 and the league average of 2.27 goals per match, I assess the probability of BTTS at around 80% and select 'yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Atlético GO’s attack produces 2.26 xG while CRB’s defense concedes 1.47 xG, translating to roughly 1.86 expected goals for the home side; CRB’s offense is 1.59 xG against Atlético’s defense at 1.13, yielding ~1.36 goals and ~3.22 total expected goals. Seasonal figures support this projection — both teams have 67% of matches with at least 3 goals, and the league average is 2.27, so this fixture is above the league norm. Both teams score frequently: both teams to score in 50% of Atlético’s matches and 83% of CRB’s matches, and in the last 5 games CRB scored 8 goals (1.6 average) versus Atlético’s 4 goals (0.8), indicating greater attacking momentum from the visitors. Additionally, Atlético averages 22.17 shots with 6.67 on target, CRB 13.67 with 6.0 on target, with conversion rates of 8% vs 10% — at this volume of chances the probability of at least three goals increases. Therefore I recommend backing Over 2.5 goals as the strongest value signal (Over 1.5 is very likely ~92%, Over 3.5 remains less likely ~42%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at half-time — Atlético GO have been level at the break in 5 of their last 5 matches (100%), with half-time goals averaging 1.0 for the home side versus 0.5 for CRB. In the second half I favour the hosts: their xG is 2.26 versus the visitors’ 1.59, and average shots 22.17 vs 13.67 translate into a season-long goals average of 1.83 vs 1.33. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win after 90 minutes (X/1) — I assign it 23% (approx. 50% probability of a half-time draw × approx. 45% conversion of such a draw into a home victory). Additionally I give 18% to the home side leading at the break and winning (1/1) and 17% to a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), since half-time draws are frequent despite the hosts’ offensive edge. Lower probabilities for 1/2 (6%), 2/1 (4%) and 2/X (4%) stem from the visitors’ lower xG (1.59) and fewer average shots (13.67), although CRB score at least once in 83% of matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Atlético GO | CRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CRB is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Atlético GO · 1.8 pts / match - CRB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CRB is 58% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Atlético GO · 1.58 goals / match - CRB
Atlético GO is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Atlético GO · 1.67 goals / match - CRB
Atlético GO scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while CRB keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).
CRB scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Atlético GO keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlético GO
Over / Under - CRB
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Atlético GO is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Atlético GO · 1.33 pts / match - CRB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlético GO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CRB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Atlético GO
CRB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Atlético GO | Liga | CRB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.27 | ▲ 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 42% | 43% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Atlético GO 1 - 0 - 1 CRB. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlético GO vs CRB?
The Serie B match finished Atlético GO 3:3 CRB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Atlético GO and CRB?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Atlético GO won 1, CRB won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlético GO vs CRB?
Atlético GO score 1.00 goals per game on average and CRB 1.58. The Serie B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Atlético GO's matches and 67% of CRB's.
What form are Atlético GO and CRB in?
Over the last 5 games Atlético GO have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CRB 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlético GO vs CRB?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Atlético GO vs CRB: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


