Atlético Grau vs Cienciano: match statistics
Atlético Grau vs Cienciano: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Atlético Grau played Cienciano in Primera División (Peru). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Atlético Grau: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Cienciano: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Atlético Grau scores 0.69 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Cienciano scores 2.08 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Atlético Grau 31%, Cienciano 69%. Over 2.5: Atlético Grau 31%, Cienciano 69%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Cienciano has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.34. Atlético Grau: 12.0 shots per match, Cienciano: 15.6.
Match halves
Atlético Grau: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.38. Cienciano: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Atlético Grau: 31-45+ (4 goals). Cienciano: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Cienciano based on season-long metrics: they have 8 wins and 27 goals versus Atlético Grau’s 2 wins and 9 goals. In the last 5 matches Cienciano recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses averaging 1.4 points per game, while Atlético have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses averaging 0.8 points. Atlético at home concede only 0.67 goals per game and keep 50% clean sheets, whereas Cienciano away concede 1.67 goals and have no clean sheets, giving the hosts a significant defensive edge. Offensively the visitors are more efficient: 1.33 goals away and a conversion rate around 10% with 5.17 SOT, versus 1.0 goal, 7% conversion and 4.67 SOT for the hosts; xG shows 1.54 for Atlético at home vs 1.44 for Cienciano, so the hosts create marginally more expected goals but the visitors finish chances better. Therefore I forecast a narrow Cienciano win; I give them a 45% probability, 30% for the home side and 25% for a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Atlético Grau 71% and Cienciano 67%, both above the league average of 56%, indicating most matches involving these teams produce goals at both ends. Cienciano has recorded no clean sheets this season (0%), while Atlético Grau has kept a clean sheet in only 29% of matches, so the likelihood of either side conceding is high. Atlético Grau averages 2.71 goals per game with xG 1.91 and 7.14 shots on target, while conceding 0.86 goals; Cienciano averages 1.33 goals with xG 1.44 and 5.17 shots on target, and concedes 1.67 goals — both teams create chances and are vulnerable at the back. Counterargument: last 5 matches BTTS is 40% for Grau and 20% for Cienciano, and recent goals per game are 1.2 (Grau) and 0.8 (Cienciano), suggesting a short-term drop in efficiency. Considering the seasonal 71% vs 67%, Cienciano’s lack of clean sheets and Grau’s clear attacking metrics, I forecast BTTS - Yes as more likely and estimate 72% for 'yes' versus 28% for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Atlético Grau scores on average 2.71 goals at home and has an attacking xG of 1.91, while Cienciano concedes on average 1.67 goals away with an xG against of 1.40, translating to an expected ~1.66 goals for the home side. Cienciano has an attacking xG of 1.44, and the hosts an xG against of 0.94, which yields an expected ~1.19 goals for the visitors and a total expected value of about 2.85 goals for the match. Seasonal stats confirm a strong tendency for goals: over 1.5 occurred for Atlético Grau in 86% of matches and for Cienciano in 83%, and over 2.5 in 71% and 67% respectively, averaging roughly a 69% argument in favor of Over 2.5. Additionally, the hosts average 17.7 shots (7.14 on target) with a 15% conversion, while the guests average 13.17 shots (5.17 on target) with a 10% conversion, which increases the likelihood that xG will convert into goals. The strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Over 1.5 (high 86%/83% seasonally and an expected 2.85 total goals), therefore I recommend backing the Over side at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Atlético Grau led at half-time in 3 home matches (43%) and scores on average 1.43 goals in the first half while conceding 0.71, whereas Cienciano has only 0.17 goals at the break and concedes 0.67 on average. The home side posts higher xG (1.91 vs 1.44), more shots (17.71 vs 13.17) and more shots on target (7.14 vs 5.17), and Atlético’s season win rate is 86% versus the visitors’ 33%, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Atlético additionally earns an average of 2.43 points in the second half and wins the second half in 71% of cases (vs 33% for Cienciano), so a lead at the break is more likely to translate into a full-time victory. As a result the most probable scenario is 1/1 (34%), the second-strongest signal is X/1 (26%) due to 43% of draws at half-time, and turnaround variants are rated at 3–7% because of Cienciano’s poor first-half statistics (0.17).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Atlético Grau | Cienciano | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cienciano is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Atlético Grau · 2 pts / match - Cienciano
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cienciano is 201% better for: goals scored per match.
0.69 goals / match - Atlético Grau · 2.08 goals / match - Cienciano
Atlético Grau is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Atlético Grau · 1.23 goals / match - Cienciano
Atlético Grau scores in 38% of matches (5 of 13 matches), while Cienciano keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
Cienciano scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Atlético Grau keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlético Grau
Over / Under - Cienciano
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlético Grau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cienciano - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Atlético Grau
Cienciano
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Atlético Grau | Liga | Cienciano | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.85 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 57% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 55% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 24% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 66% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 46% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Atlético Grau 0 - 1 - 1 Cienciano. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlético Grau vs Cienciano?
The Primera División match finished Atlético Grau 1:2 Cienciano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Atlético Grau and Cienciano?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Atlético Grau won 0, Cienciano won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlético Grau vs Cienciano?
Atlético Grau score 0.69 goals per game on average and Cienciano 2.08. The Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Atlético Grau's matches and 69% of Cienciano's.
What form are Atlético Grau and Cienciano in?
Over the last 5 games Atlético Grau have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cienciano 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlético Grau vs Cienciano?
The statistical background for Atlético Grau vs Cienciano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


