Atlético Madrid vs Celta de Vigo: match statistics
Atlético Madrid vs Celta de Vigo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Atlético Madrid played Celta de Vigo in La Liga (Spain). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Atlético Madrid: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Celta de Vigo: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Atlético Madrid scores 1.71 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Celta de Vigo scores 1.41 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Atlético Madrid 53%, Celta de Vigo 65%. Over 2.5: Atlético Madrid 50%, Celta de Vigo 47%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Atlético Madrid has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.25. Atlético Madrid: 13.2 shots per match, Celta de Vigo: 10.4.
Match halves
Atlético Madrid: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.94. Celta de Vigo: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Atlético Madrid: 76-90+ (14 goals). Celta de Vigo: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
La Liga: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Atlético holds a clear home advantage: they have won 82% of matches at home, average 2.24 goals per game and have a positive home goal difference of +22, while Celta average 1.29 goals away with a +3 goal difference. Chance quality favors the hosts — Atlético’s home xG is 1.83 versus Celta’s away xG of 1.13, and xG conceded is 1.46 for Celta against versus 1.03 against Atlético, indicating greater risk of concessions for the visitors. Atlético averages 15.06 shots and 6.53 shots on target at home, whereas Celta record 9.29 shots and 3.94 on target away; the share of matches without scoring is 6% for the hosts vs 18% for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Atlético scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while Celta scored 5, conceded 10 and average 0.6 points per game, which further supports favoring the home side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 65% (Atlético 65% and Celta 65%), and in the last 5 matches both sides recorded BTTS at 60%, which is a strong signal for goals from both teams. Atlético scores 1.53 goals per game and concedes 1.47, while Celta scores 1.29 and concedes 1.12 on the season; additionally, in the last 5 matches Celta concedes on average 2.0 goals while scoring 1.0, and Atlético scores 1.6 and concedes 1.4, so both teams show a tendency to reach the opponent’s goal. xG metrics confirm this risk: Atlético has an attacking xG of 1.37, and Celta allows xG 1.46 per game; simultaneously Celta has attacking xG 1.13 and Atlético allows xG 1.34, which suggests scoring opportunities for both sides. A clean sheet for the home side is rare — only 18% of Atlético’s home matches end without conceding, and Celta’s clean sheets away are 29%, so a shutout game is unlikely. Considering seasonal BTTS 65%/65%, recent form and xG, I assess the probability of BTTS at 72% 'yes' versus 28% 'no' and recommend a 'yes' bet as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining team xG and opponent-adjusted xG yields expected 1.42 goals for Atlético and 1.24 for Celta, totalling 2.66 goals. Atlético score 1.53 and concede 1.47 at home on average, Celta away score 1.29 and concede 1.12; xG is 1.37 for the home side and 1.13 for the visitors, with opponent-adjusted xG against of 1.34 (Atlético) and 1.46 (Celta). Seasonally, over 1.5 goals occurs in 94% of Atlético’s home matches and 71% of Celta’s away matches (avg 82.5%), and both teams score in 65% of their matches, which strengthens the signal for Over 1.5 — I rate it at 86%. The 2.5 line is balanced: both teams record 47% seasonally Over 2.5, and a Poisson model on a 2.66 mean gives roughly a 50% chance of at least 3 goals, so I assign Over 2.5 a 50% probability. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonally 24% for both teams; Poisson ≈28%), therefore the best and strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1): Atlético were level at the break in 35% of their matches and Celta in 41%, which increases the probability of an HT draw. Atlético average 0.65 goals by half-time versus Celta’s 0.35, but are stronger after the break – in 100% of Atlético’s home games at least one goal was scored in the second half, and in their last five matches Atlético averaged 1.2 goals in the second half and won the second half 60% of the time. Celta are in crisis: in their last five fixtures they have an 80% loss rate and concede on average 2.0 goals per game, so the likelihood of them maintaining a favorable result after the break is low. Additionally, xG 1.37 (Atlético) versus 1.13 (Celta) and a higher number of shots 11.47 vs 9.29 support the hosts’ edge in chance creation, while seasonal BTTS of 65% for both teams combined with low HT BTTS (18% and 12%) indicates the decisive action should occur after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Atlético Madrid | Celta de Vigo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Atlético Madrid is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.71 goals / match - Atlético Madrid · 1.41 goals / match - Celta de Vigo
Atlético Madrid is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Atlético Madrid · 1.29 goals / match - Celta de Vigo
Atlético Madrid scores in 88% of matches (30 of 34 matches), while Celta de Vigo keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
Celta de Vigo scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Atlético Madrid keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlético Madrid
Over / Under - Celta de Vigo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Atlético Madrid is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Atlético Madrid · 1.18 pts / match - Celta de Vigo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlético Madrid - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Celta de Vigo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Atlético Madrid
Celta de Vigo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (La Liga).
Teams vs league
| Atlético Madrid | Liga | Celta de Vigo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.79 | 2.71 | • 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 24% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 69% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 83% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Atlético Madrid 0 - 1 - 0 Celta de Vigo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlético Madrid vs Celta de Vigo?
The La Liga match finished Atlético Madrid 0:1 Celta de Vigo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlético Madrid vs Celta de Vigo?
Atlético Madrid score 1.71 goals per game on average and Celta de Vigo 1.41. The La Liga average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Atlético Madrid's matches and 65% of Celta de Vigo's.
What form are Atlético Madrid and Celta de Vigo in?
Over the last 5 games Atlético Madrid have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Celta de Vigo 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlético Madrid vs Celta de Vigo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


