Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC: match statistics
Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Atlético Ottawa played Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Atlético Ottawa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cavalry FC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Atlético Ottawa scores 1.64 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Cavalry FC scores 1.90 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Atlético Ottawa 73%, Cavalry FC 40%. Over 2.5: Atlético Ottawa 64%, Cavalry FC 40%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.25. Atlético Ottawa: 10.6 shots per match, Cavalry FC: 14.4.
Match halves
Atlético Ottawa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 1.18. Cavalry FC: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.30.
Goals by minute
Atlético Ottawa: 76-90+ (9 goals). Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect an even match and predict a draw; both teams have similar xG: Atlético Ottawa 1.58 at home versus Cavalry FC 1.52 away. Atlético score 2.25 goals per home game on average and have a 75% home win rate while conceding 1.25 goals on average, and they have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches. Cavalry concede only 0.5 goals per away match on average and keep a clean sheet in 50% of away games; they have won 67% of away fixtures this season and have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches. Both teams average 5.5 shots on target per game, but Ottawa have a higher conversion rate at 17% versus Cavalry’s 14% and have not failed to score at home (percentage of home games without scoring 0% versus 33%), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring and a split of points. Therefore I assess the probability of a draw at 40%, home win at 33% and away win at 27%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Based on the data, the signal for BTTS - Yes is strong: in the last 5 matches Atlético Ottawa produced BTTS in 100% of cases, while Cavalry FC did so in only 20%. Ottawa averages 2.25 goals per game this season with xG 1.92, and Cavalry concedes an average xG against of 1.32, so the home side generates more expected chances than the opponent typically neutralizes. However, Cavalry have conceded only 0.4 goals on average in their last 5 matches and have a season BTTS rate of 33%, which weighs against the both-teams-to-score scenario despite their seasonal return of 1.67 goals and xG 1.52. Additionally, the league has a high BTTS 60% and 2.83 goals per game on average, and Ottawa averages 18 shots and 5.75 on target per game versus Cavalry’s 12.17 and 5.5, increasing the hosts’ likelihood of scoring. Balancing Ottawa’s strong attack (2.25 goals, 1.92 xG, 100% BTTS in last 5) against the visitors’ good defensive form (0.4 conceded in last 5), I assign 62% to Yes and 38% to No as the final forecast.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The analysis is based on xG and recent form: Atlético Ottawa has an attacking xG of 1.92, Cavalry 1.52, and opponent defensive xG of 0.84 (Ottawa) and 1.32 (Cavalry). After combining attack and defense, I project roughly 1.62 goals for the home side and 1.18 for the away side, for a total of 2.80 expected goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.80 yields ~77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~53% for Over 2.5, and ~31% for Over 3.5. Additionally, the home team has 100% of matches Over 1.5 this season and has averaged 2.6 goals in the last 5 matches, while Cavalry averaged 2.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded in their last 5, which reinforces the expectation of at least 2 goals. As a result, the strongest and safest data-driven signal is Over 1.5 (over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), because both teams frequently draw at the break — hosts in 75% of matches, visitors in 67%. By half-time the hosts average 0.75 goals and the visitors 0.5, while the away side have not conceded at HT in the stats (concededAVGHT_away = 0.0 and seasonCSPercentageHT_away = 100%), so I expect a low-scoring first half. In the second half the hosts have a clear advantage: they average 1.5 goals after the break versus the visitors' 1.17 (scored_2hg_avg_home 1.5 vs scored_2hg_avg_away 1.17), possess higher xG (1.92 vs 1.52) and more shots (18 vs 12.17), which favors them scoring after half-time. Additionally the hosts have a higher win percentage (75% vs 67%) and better defense by xG against (0.84 vs 1.32), therefore I assigned greatest weight to X/1 (40%), alternatively 1/1 (15%) and X/X (20%), while scenarios with the away side leading at the break or winning are considered less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Atlético Ottawa | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cavalry FC is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Atlético Ottawa · 2.4 pts / match - Cavalry FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - Atlético Ottawa · 1.9 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC is 246% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Atlético Ottawa · 0.5 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Atlético Ottawa scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).
Cavalry FC scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Atlético Ottawa keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlético Ottawa
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Atlético Ottawa · 1.6 pts / match - Cavalry FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlético Ottawa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Atlético Ottawa
Cavalry FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Atlético Ottawa | Liga | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.36 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 60% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 21% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 55% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 88% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Atlético Ottawa 4 - 1 - 1 Cavalry FC. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Atlético Ottawa 0:3 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Atlético Ottawa and Cavalry FC?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Atlético Ottawa won 4, Cavalry FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC?
Atlético Ottawa score 1.64 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 1.90. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Atlético Ottawa's matches and 40% of Cavalry FC's.
What form are Atlético Ottawa and Cavalry FC in?
Over the last 5 games Atlético Ottawa have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cavalry FC 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Atlético Ottawa vs Cavalry FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


