Australia - A-LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: match statistics

Auckland crest
Auckland
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Melbourne City FC crest
Melbourne City FC
155%(2.04)
X30%(3.62)
215%(3.71)

Auckland displays solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive goal difference of 29:18 for the season. The hosts stand out offensively, recording an average of 1.5 goals per match at home with a high xG coefficient (2.15), indicating the quality of chances created. Melbourne City FC struggles in away matches, drawing as many as 56% of encounters, and their average goals scored stands at a mere 1.11 per match with a negative goal difference (-4). The form of both teams in the last five matches favors Auckland (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG), and possession statistics are balanced, suggesting a tactical advantage for the hosts. Given Auckland's superiority in home play and the visitors' weaker efficiency on the road, a home victory is the most likely scenario, though Melbourne City's tendency to draw does not rule out a split of points.

Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auckland played Melbourne City FC in A-League (Australia). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Auckland: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Melbourne City FC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auckland scores 1.61 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Melbourne City FC scores 1.11 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auckland 67%, Melbourne City FC 50%. Over 2.5: Auckland 56%, Melbourne City FC 39%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auckland has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.45. Auckland: 16.0 shots per match, Melbourne City FC: 12.2.

Match halves

Auckland: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.56. Melbourne City FC: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Auckland: 16-30 (7 goals). Melbourne City FC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A-League: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auckland displays solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive goal difference of 29:18 for the season. The hosts stand out offensively, recording an average of 1.5 goals per match at home with a high xG coefficient (2.15), indicating the quality of chances created. Melbourne City FC struggles in away matches, drawing as many as 56% of encounters, and their average goals scored stands at a mere 1.11 per match with a negative goal difference (-4). The form of both teams in the last five matches favors Auckland (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG), and possession statistics are balanced, suggesting a tactical advantage for the hosts. Given Auckland's superiority in home play and the visitors' weaker efficiency on the road, a home victory is the most likely scenario, though Melbourne City's tendency to draw does not rule out a split of points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
AucklandMelbourne City FC
17Shots11
AucklandMelbourne City FC
9Shots on target2
AucklandMelbourne City FC
2.02xG1.22
AucklandMelbourne City FC
9Corners7
AucklandMelbourne City FC
44Dangerous attacks53
AucklandMelbourne City FC
8Fouls10
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0Cards1
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.61Goals scored / match1.11
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1Goals conceded / match1.33
AucklandMelbourne City FC
50%Average possession57%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
5.67Shots on target / match3.83
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match12.17
AucklandMelbourne City FC
5.67Shots on target3.83
AucklandMelbourne City FC
10.1%Shot conversion9.1%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
50%Possession57%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.74xG for1.45
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.24xG against1.29
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Shooting quality

Auckland: AttackingMelbourne City FC: Balanced
AucklandMelbourne City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auckland is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Auckland · 1 pts / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland
DLWDW
Season result split
50% W28% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-4
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Melbourne City FC
WLDDL
Season result split
28% W39% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-6
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auckland is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.61 goals / match - Auckland · 1.11 goals / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Auckland · 1.33 goals / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland scoring profile: very strong

Auckland scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Melbourne City FC keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).

Melbourne City FC scoring profile: strong

Melbourne City FC scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Auckland keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

29Goals scored (season)20
AucklandMelbourne City FC
18Goals conceded (season)24
AucklandMelbourne City FC
2.61Average goals in match2.44
AucklandMelbourne City FC
10Goals scored (last 5)8
AucklandMelbourne City FC
5Goals conceded (last 5)13
AucklandMelbourne City FC

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal72%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
44%2 goals28%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
11%3 goals6%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6%4 goals6%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal61%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
28%2 goals28%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6%3 goals22%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0%4 goals11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Melbourne City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 18 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time28%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6%BTTS in both halves6%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
33%Scored in both halves17%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
60%BTTS - last 5100%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auckland is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.89 pts / match - Auckland · 1.17 pts / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland - half-time state
50% leading39% draw11% trailing
Melbourne City FC - half-time state
22% leading50% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.89Points per match (1st half)1.17
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.06Goals scored (1st half)0.56
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.22
AucklandMelbourne City FC
61%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
17%No goal before half-time50%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.17
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.06Average goals (2nd half)1.22
AucklandMelbourne City FC
61%Clean sheet after half-time56%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
56%No goal after half-time61%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Auckland - second-half results

33% W44% R22% P
34
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Melbourne City FC - second-half results

22% W50% R28% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auckland - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Melbourne City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auckland
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
3
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Melbourne City FC
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auckland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Melbourne City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).

Teams vs league

AucklandLigaMelbourne City FC
Average goals in match 2.612.83 2.44
Both teams scored 67%57% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%55% 39%
Clean sheets 33%24% 39%
Goal before half-time 83%73% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%77% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Melbourne City FCYellow cardZane Schreiber
  2. AucklandSubstitutionOn: Sam CosgroveOff: Hiroki Sakai

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ben AbrahamMatches officiated: 19
3Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 232%Home wins42%Draws26%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Auckland 0 - 0 - 1 Melbourne City FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

The A-League match finished Auckland 3:0 Melbourne City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

Auckland score 1.61 goals per game on average and Melbourne City FC 1.11. The A-League average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Auckland's matches and 50% of Melbourne City FC's.

What form are Auckland and Melbourne City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Auckland have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Melbourne City FC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.