Latvia - VirsligaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 06 September 2026

Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
1 : 0half-time 1:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auda played BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auda 59%, BFC Daugavpils 57%. Over 2.5: Auda 55%, BFC Daugavpils 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.54. Auda: 13.2 shots per match, BFC Daugavpils: 12.7.

Match halves

Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91. BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back Auda to win ('1') because the hosts hold clear advantages in key seasonal metrics: Auda sit 3rd with 12 wins and 37 goals scored versus BFC Daugavpils' 8 wins and 29 goals. Home data favors Auda — they average 2.0 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.66 and 61% possession, while the visitors score 1.6 goals away (xG 1.51) with 47% possession; both teams, however, average 1.6 points per game over their last 5 matches. Defensively the hosts are superior: Auda concede 1.4 goals per home game with an average xG against of 1.31, whereas Daugavpils concede 1.9 on the road with xG against 1.69. On the other hand, Daugavpils have had an impressive scoring run in the last 5 (11 goals vs Auda's 4) and their away rate of matches without scoring is 0%, which increases their chance to score and makes it harder for the hosts to keep a clean sheet. Considering game control, superior xG and Auda's positive home goal difference (+6 vs the visitors' -3 on the road), I assess probabilities as: Auda 55%, draw 30%, BFC Daugavpils 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data show conflicting but measurable signals: Auda at home has a seasonal BTTS 31% (and only 20% in the last 5 matches), while BFC Daugavpils has a seasonal BTTS 90% (60% in the last 5). BFC virtually always scores — seasonally it has had 0% no-goal games — averaging 1.6 goals per match over the season and 2.2 in the last 5, whereas Auda at home averages 1.0 goals seasonally and 0.8 in the last 5, failing to score in 46% of home fixtures. xG confirms chances will be created: Auda has xG 1.55 versus 1.51 for BFC, and opponents generate 1.55 xG against Auda and 1.69 against BFC; both teams average about 12.7–12.8 shots and ~4.7–4.85 shots on target per match. Although Auda keeps a clean sheet in 38% of home games and concedes just 0.77 goals at home (which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring), BFC’s advantage — high shot conversion 13% and strong scoring form in the last 5 — increases the probability that both teams will score. Considering the above numbers, I recommend a 65% assessment for BTTS = Yes versus 35% for No, because BFC practically always scores (0% no-goal) and combined with Auda’s xG 1.55 there is a realistic chance for Auda to score (approximately 54% of cases, given Auda failed to score in 46% of home matches).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is about 3.15 (Auda 1.66 vs BFC Daugavpils 1.49), which in a Poisson model translates to roughly an 82% probability of Over 1.5 goals and 61% for Over 2.5 goals. Daugavpils has a season-long 100% of matches Over 1.5 goals and a 90% BTTS rate, and its shot conversion is 13% versus Auda’s 8%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Both teams register a similar number of shots (12.69 vs 12.8) and have comparable xG for (1.55 vs 1.51); additionally, in the last 5 matches Daugavpils scored 11 goals (2.2 average) while Auda scored 4 goals (0.8 average). Given the cumulative xG, the high BTTS incidence for Daugavpils and the fact that Daugavpils keeps clean sheets only 10% of the time, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, with Over 2.5 as a reasonable alternative.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I predict a draw: Auda led at the break in 31% of matches, and draws occur in 54% of their games, so the most common score at 45 minutes is level. For full-time I back the home win, because Auda averages 1.54 points per match versus 1.0 for BFC and has a 46% win rate this season compared to only 20% for visitors. Auda keeps a clean sheet more often (38% of matches versus 10% for BFC) and concedes on average 0.15 goals in the first half versus 0.5 for their opponents, which favors maintaining a draw at the break and taking the initiative in the second half. The away side are dangerous after the interval—they score on average 1.3 second-half goals and 100% of their matches feature at least one goal after the break—but they also concede 1.4 goals on average after half-time, so I expect goals in the final 45 minutes, albeit with Auda having the advantage. On this basis the most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
AudaBFC Daugavpils
11Shots7
AudaBFC Daugavpils
4Shots on target3
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.63xG1.2
AudaBFC Daugavpils
6Corners2
AudaBFC Daugavpils
91Dangerous attacks75
AudaBFC Daugavpils
20Fouls13
AudaBFC Daugavpils
3Cards1
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.68Goals scored / match1.26
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.18Goals conceded / match1.26
AudaBFC Daugavpils
60%Average possession47%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
4.68Shots on target / match4.78
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match12.74
AudaBFC Daugavpils
4.68Shots on target4.78
AudaBFC Daugavpils
12.7%Shot conversion9.9%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
60%Possession47%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.63xG for1.54
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.13xG against1.61
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Auda: BalancedBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
AudaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BFC Daugavpils is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Auda · 2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

Auda
LWDLD
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
BFC Daugavpils
WDLWW
Season result split
35% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - Auda · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

Auda is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - Auda · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

37Goals scored (season)29
AudaBFC Daugavpils
26Goals conceded (season)29
AudaBFC Daugavpils
2.86Average goals in match2.52
AudaBFC Daugavpils
4Goals scored (last 5)9
AudaBFC Daugavpils
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
AudaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal74%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
50%2 goals30%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
14%3 goals17%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
5%4 goals4%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal74%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
32%2 goals26%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
14%3 goals17%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
5%4 goals9%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time4%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
36%Scored in both halves22%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
40%BTTS - last 540%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - Auda · 1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

Auda - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.3
AudaBFC Daugavpils
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.39
AudaBFC Daugavpils
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.41Average goals (1st half)0.7
AudaBFC Daugavpils
55%Clean sheet before half-time74%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
41%No goal before half-time70%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

1.55Points per match (2nd half)1.13
AudaBFC Daugavpils
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
AudaBFC Daugavpils
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
AudaBFC Daugavpils
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.83
AudaBFC Daugavpils
55%Clean sheet after half-time30%
AudaBFC Daugavpils
36%No goal after half-time35%
AudaBFC Daugavpils

Auda - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W48% R30% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
13
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals in match 2.862.97 2.52
Both teams scored 59%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%55% 43%
Clean sheets 32%24% 26%
Goal before half-time 77%76% 52%
Goal after half-time 82%83% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardWilliam Eseme Mukwelle
  2. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Ervīns PiņaskinsOff: Raivis Skrebels
  3. AudaSubstitutionOn: Kader KoneOff: Mohamoud Fofana
  4. AudaYellow cardBarthélémy Diedhiou
  5. AudaYellow cardWally Fofana
  6. AudaYellow cardKader Kone

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Auda 1 - 1 - 4 BFC Daugavpils. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1
Auda
Auda
2 : 3
BFC Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
FK Auda Riga
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 1
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:0 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Auda won 1, BFC Daugavpils won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?

Auda score 1.68 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.26. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Auda's matches and 57% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are Auda and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.