Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics
Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Auda played BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Auda 59%, BFC Daugavpils 57%. Over 2.5: Auda 55%, BFC Daugavpils 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.54. Auda: 13.2 shots per match, BFC Daugavpils: 12.7.
Match halves
Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91. BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Auda to win ('1') because the hosts hold clear advantages in key seasonal metrics: Auda sit 3rd with 12 wins and 37 goals scored versus BFC Daugavpils' 8 wins and 29 goals. Home data favors Auda — they average 2.0 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.66 and 61% possession, while the visitors score 1.6 goals away (xG 1.51) with 47% possession; both teams, however, average 1.6 points per game over their last 5 matches. Defensively the hosts are superior: Auda concede 1.4 goals per home game with an average xG against of 1.31, whereas Daugavpils concede 1.9 on the road with xG against 1.69. On the other hand, Daugavpils have had an impressive scoring run in the last 5 (11 goals vs Auda's 4) and their away rate of matches without scoring is 0%, which increases their chance to score and makes it harder for the hosts to keep a clean sheet. Considering game control, superior xG and Auda's positive home goal difference (+6 vs the visitors' -3 on the road), I assess probabilities as: Auda 55%, draw 30%, BFC Daugavpils 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data show conflicting but measurable signals: Auda at home has a seasonal BTTS 31% (and only 20% in the last 5 matches), while BFC Daugavpils has a seasonal BTTS 90% (60% in the last 5). BFC virtually always scores — seasonally it has had 0% no-goal games — averaging 1.6 goals per match over the season and 2.2 in the last 5, whereas Auda at home averages 1.0 goals seasonally and 0.8 in the last 5, failing to score in 46% of home fixtures. xG confirms chances will be created: Auda has xG 1.55 versus 1.51 for BFC, and opponents generate 1.55 xG against Auda and 1.69 against BFC; both teams average about 12.7–12.8 shots and ~4.7–4.85 shots on target per match. Although Auda keeps a clean sheet in 38% of home games and concedes just 0.77 goals at home (which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring), BFC’s advantage — high shot conversion 13% and strong scoring form in the last 5 — increases the probability that both teams will score. Considering the above numbers, I recommend a 65% assessment for BTTS = Yes versus 35% for No, because BFC practically always scores (0% no-goal) and combined with Auda’s xG 1.55 there is a realistic chance for Auda to score (approximately 54% of cases, given Auda failed to score in 46% of home matches).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is about 3.15 (Auda 1.66 vs BFC Daugavpils 1.49), which in a Poisson model translates to roughly an 82% probability of Over 1.5 goals and 61% for Over 2.5 goals. Daugavpils has a season-long 100% of matches Over 1.5 goals and a 90% BTTS rate, and its shot conversion is 13% versus Auda’s 8%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Both teams register a similar number of shots (12.69 vs 12.8) and have comparable xG for (1.55 vs 1.51); additionally, in the last 5 matches Daugavpils scored 11 goals (2.2 average) while Auda scored 4 goals (0.8 average). Given the cumulative xG, the high BTTS incidence for Daugavpils and the fact that Daugavpils keeps clean sheets only 10% of the time, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, with Over 2.5 as a reasonable alternative.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time I predict a draw: Auda led at the break in 31% of matches, and draws occur in 54% of their games, so the most common score at 45 minutes is level. For full-time I back the home win, because Auda averages 1.54 points per match versus 1.0 for BFC and has a 46% win rate this season compared to only 20% for visitors. Auda keeps a clean sheet more often (38% of matches versus 10% for BFC) and concedes on average 0.15 goals in the first half versus 0.5 for their opponents, which favors maintaining a draw at the break and taking the initiative in the second half. The away side are dangerous after the interval—they score on average 1.3 second-half goals and 100% of their matches feature at least one goal after the break—but they also concede 1.4 goals on average after half-time, so I expect goals in the final 45 minutes, albeit with Auda having the advantage. On this basis the most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
BFC Daugavpils is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Auda · 2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.68 goals / match - Auda · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils
Auda is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - Auda · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils
Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Auda · 1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Auda
BFC Daugavpils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.86 | 2.97 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 24% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | • 77% | 76% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | • 82% | 83% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Auda 1 - 1 - 4 BFC Daugavpils. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:0 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and BFC Daugavpils?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Auda won 1, BFC Daugavpils won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?
Auda score 1.68 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.26. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Auda's matches and 57% of BFC Daugavpils's.
What form are Auda and BFC Daugavpils in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs BFC Daugavpils?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs BFC Daugavpils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


