Auda vs Rīgas FS: match statistics
Auda vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Auda played Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Auda: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Auda scores 2.17 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Rīgas FS scores 2.17 and concedes 0.75. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Auda 75%, Rīgas FS 33%. Over 2.5: Auda 75%, Rīgas FS 42%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS has higher xG: 2.06 vs 1.61. Auda: 13.1 shots per match, Rīgas FS: 17.7.
Match halves
Auda: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.08. Rīgas FS: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.17.
Goals by minute
Auda: 31-45+ (7 goals). Rīgas FS: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-4. Average goals 1.40, BTTS 20%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS are the favorites: they have 10 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss this season, sitting 1st, while Auda have 8 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses and are 3rd. In form both teams look solid — Auda have won 4 of their last 5 matches (form 'wwwwl') and average 2.4 points in their last five, Rīgas have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 and average 2.6 points. In match metrics Rīgas on the road generate xG 2.22, produce 19 shots of which 6.33 are on target and score 1.67 goals, whereas Auda at home have xG 1.79, produce 14 shots with 5.6 on target and score on average 2.8 goals. The visitors’ key advantage is defense: Rīgas concede only 0.67 goals on average away and have 67% of away matches as clean sheets, while Auda concede 1.4 goals at home and have only 20% clean sheets. Auda offset this with higher finishing efficiency (conversion 20% at home vs 9% for Rīgas), but considering superior xG, greater possession (66% vs 60%) and Rīgas’ unbeaten away record, I forecast an away win; estimated probabilities are 55% Rīgas, 25% Auda and 20% draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators point the other way: both teams record BTTS only 33%, with clean sheets for Auda in 50% of matches and Rīgas FS in 67%, favoring a No Goal scenario. However, recent form reverses this picture: Auda has seen BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches (4/5), averaging 3.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Rīgas FS averaged 2.8 scored and 1.2 conceded in their last 5 with BTTS at 40%. xG comparison shows Auda with xG 1.90 (against opponent average xG 0.87), and Rīgas FS with xG 2.22 (against 0.70), giving combined xG ≈4.12 and suggesting over 1.0 expected goal per side. Additionally, Auda averages 16.33 shots with 6.0 on target and 16% conversion, while Rīgas FS average 19.0 shots with 6.33 on target and 9% conversion, so both sides create chances. Considering the strong signal from the last 5 matches (notably Auda’s 80% BTTS), rising average goals conceded (1.6 and 1.2), plus combined xG and chance volume, I favor BTTS = Yes (65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated xG shows: Auda xG_for 1.90 vs Rīgas FS xG_against 0.70 → expected xG for Auda ≈1.30; Rīgas FS xG_for 2.22 vs Auda xG_against 0.87 → expected xG for Rīgas ≈1.55, total ≈2.85. In the last 5 matches Auda scores an average of 3.0 goals, Rīgas FS 2.8 goals, and in those 5 fixtures Over 2.5 occurred for Auda in 100% and for Rīgas in 60%, which supports a goal-heavy scenario. Seasonal rates add context: Auda has 83% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Rīgas FS away 33% of such matches, but Rīgas also has 67% clean sheets away and has conceded only 9 goals this season. Considering the combined expected total 2.85 (1.30+1.55), the league average 3.05 and strong attacking form of both teams, the strongest and most probable signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has moderate backing (~62%) but higher risk due to Rīgas defensive numbers. Therefore I recommend the over side at the 1.5 line as the best value to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Rīgas FS are clear favorites: they have a 100% away win rate and led at the break in 67% of matches, with an average halftime points value of 2.17, indicating strong starts. Their xG of 2.22 versus Auda’s 1.90 and lower xG conceded (0.70 vs 0.87) show that the visitors create more high-value chances while better limiting opponents. However, the hosts score more overall (2.67 goals per game vs Rīgas’ 1.67) and are particularly dangerous after the break: they average 1.67 second-half goals, and 83% of their matches see at least one goal after halftime. At the same time, the low percentage of matches with both teams scoring (33% for each) and Rīgas’ 67% clean sheets suggest the visitors have a realistic chance to hold a lead and win with a relatively low scoreline. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 2/2 scenario (visitors leading at half-time and winning full-time), with X/2 and X/1 as alternatives reflecting Rīgas’ defensive control and Auda’s second-half strength, respectively.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Auda · 2.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Auda · 0.75 goals / match - Rīgas FS
Auda scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).
Rīgas FS scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Auda · 1.83 pts / match - Rīgas FS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Auda
Rīgas FS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 86% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Auda 1 - 0 - 4 Rīgas FS. Average goals 1.40, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Rīgas FS?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 0:3 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Rīgas FS?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 1, Rīgas FS won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Rīgas FS?
Auda score 2.17 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.17. The Virsliga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Auda's matches and 33% of Rīgas FS's.
What form are Auda and Rīgas FS in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Rīgas FS?
The statistical background for Auda vs Rīgas FS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


