Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a very close match between two teams with similar disposition. Audace Cerignola presents slightly better offensive form at home (xG 1.64 vs 1.21 xG Against), yet their home record is poor – barely 27% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Monopoli impresses with efficiency away with 50% victories and a solid defense (40% clean sheets), but lower xG indicators (1.2) and a lower number of shots on goal (3.4) suggest a more cautious style of play. The recent form of both teams is comparable – hosts with 1.6 PPG, visitors with 1.8 PPG in the last five matches. Considering Monopoli's high efficiency in away matches and Cerignola's instability at home (36% draws), the most probable scenario seems to be a sharing of points, although the hosts have a slight advantage thanks to playing in front of their own crowd.
Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Audace Cerignola played Monopoli in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Audace Cerignola: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Monopoli: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Audace Cerignola scores 1.27 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Monopoli scores 1.18 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Audace Cerignola 50%, Monopoli 55%. Over 2.5: Audace Cerignola 50%, Monopoli 41%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Audace Cerignola has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.25. Audace Cerignola: 12.6 shots per match, Monopoli: 9.5.
Match halves
Audace Cerignola: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.82. Monopoli: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Audace Cerignola: 46-60 (7 goals). Monopoli: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a very close match between two teams with similar disposition. Audace Cerignola presents slightly better offensive form at home (xG 1.64 vs 1.21 xG Against), yet their home record is poor – barely 27% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Monopoli impresses with efficiency away with 50% victories and a solid defense (40% clean sheets), but lower xG indicators (1.2) and a lower number of shots on goal (3.4) suggest a more cautious style of play. The recent form of both teams is comparable – hosts with 1.6 PPG, visitors with 1.8 PPG in the last five matches. Considering Monopoli's high efficiency in away matches and Cerignola's instability at home (36% draws), the most probable scenario seems to be a sharing of points, although the hosts have a slight advantage thanks to playing in front of their own crowd.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Audace Cerignola | Monopoli | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Monopoli is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Audace Cerignola · 1.8 pts / match - Monopoli
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Audace Cerignola is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Audace Cerignola · 1.18 goals / match - Monopoli
Monopoli is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Audace Cerignola · 1.18 goals / match - Monopoli
Audace Cerignola scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Monopoli keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
Monopoli scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Audace Cerignola
Over / Under - Monopoli
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Audace Cerignola is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Audace Cerignola · 0.91 pts / match - Monopoli
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Audace Cerignola - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Monopoli - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Audace Cerignola
Monopoli
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Audace Cerignola | Liga | Monopoli | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.59 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 66% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Audace Cerignola 0 - 0 - 1 Monopoli. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?
The Serie C Group C match finished Audace Cerignola 0:0 Monopoli. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?
Audace Cerignola score 1.27 goals per game on average and Monopoli 1.18. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Audace Cerignola's matches and 55% of Monopoli's.
What form are Audace Cerignola and Monopoli in?
Over the last 5 games Audace Cerignola have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Monopoli 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?
The statistical background for Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.