Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics
Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Austin II played San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Austin II: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Austin II scores 2.04 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 1.82 and concedes 1.27. League average: 3.29 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Austin II 52%, San Jose Earthquakes II 64%. Over 2.5: Austin II 48%, San Jose Earthquakes II 55%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Austin II has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.62. Austin II: 13.5 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.8.
Match halves
Austin II: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.00. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Austin II: 31-45+ (12 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Austin II lead the home standings and have recorded 15 wins against just 2 losses over the course of the season, while San Jose Earthquakes II sit only 19th. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding just 3 during that run, whereas the visitors have failed to win any of their last five games, scoring only 3 goals. At home, Austin II average 2.25 goals per match with a 17% shot conversion rate, compared with San Jose’s 1.58 goals and 12% conversion rate away from home. The visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.58 goals and 1.74 xG, while keeping a clean sheet in only 8% of away matches, which favors the hosts, who create an average of 1.63 xG. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as San Jose have drawn 42% of their away matches, but the clear advantage in form, attack and league position points to an Austin II win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both teams scoring is supported by San Jose Earthquakes II’s high seasonal BTTS rate of 83%, while in their last five matches, both teams produced this outcome in 60% of games. Austin II average 2.1 goals at home, while the visitors concede an average of 1.58, giving the hosts excellent conditions to find the net. San Jose have shown weaker recent finishing, scoring just 0.6 goals per game across their last five appearances, but their average xG remains at 1.62, compared with Austin’s 1.23 xG conceded. In addition, Austin keep a clean sheet in only 20% of matches, leaving the visitors with a realistic chance of scoring despite the hosts conceding just 0.9 goals on average. The main risk to the pick is Austin’s low seasonal BTTS rate of 40%; however, the hosts’ attacking advantage and the visitors’ strong BTTS profile provide a slight indication towards "BTTS - Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Austin II scores an average of 2.10 goals per match, while San Jose Earthquakes II concede 1.58, which clearly strengthens the outlook for goals in the home team’s matches. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their games, and at least 2 goals have been scored in 92% of their matches. Austin II are in good form, having scored 11 goals in their last five appearances—an average of 2.2 per match—while their opponents conceded 8 goals over the same period. Even with the visitors’ recent drop in finishing efficiency, their xG across the last five matches stands at 1.59, making Over 1.5 goals the most convincing selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Austin II are in clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.2 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while San Jose Earthquakes II have scored just 0.6 goals and allowed 1.6. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five games, whereas the visitors have not held a half-time lead in any of them and were trailing at half-time in 60% of cases. Across the season, Austin II average 1.2 goals scored before the break and just 0.4 conceded, while San Jose’s away profile shows only 0.75 goals scored in the first half. The hosts’ advantage is also evident after the interval, as their opponents concede an average of 1.17 goals during that period, while Austin II have scored 1.0 goal after half-time in their last five matches. The scenario of Austin II leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage to win the match is therefore the strongest-supported HT/FT outcome, backed by both current form and the teams’ respective attacking and defensive records.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Austin II | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Austin II is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Austin II · 0.6 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Austin II is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
2.04 goals / match - Austin II · 1.82 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Austin II is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Austin II · 1.27 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Austin II scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Austin II
Over / Under - San Jose Earthquakes II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Austin II is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Austin II · 1.64 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Austin II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Austin II
San Jose Earthquakes II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Austin II | Liga | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.87 | 3.29 | ▼ 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 66% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 76% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Austin II 1 - 1 - 0 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Austin II 1:0 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Austin II and San Jose Earthquakes II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Austin II won 1, San Jose Earthquakes II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
Austin II score 2.04 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 1.82. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Austin II's matches and 64% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.
What form are Austin II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?
Over the last 5 games Austin II have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


