United States - MLSQ2 StadiumData current as of 21 October 2026

Austin vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics

Austin crest
Austin
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Colorado Rapids crest
Colorado Rapids

Austin vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin played Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The match was played on 10 September 2026. Venue: Q2 Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Austin: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Colorado Rapids: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin scores 1.26 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Colorado Rapids scores 1.35 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin 65%, Colorado Rapids 39%. Over 2.5: Austin 70%, Colorado Rapids 48%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Rapids has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.26. Austin: 10.9 shots per match, Colorado Rapids: 11.9.

Match halves

Austin: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70. Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Austin: 76-90+ (12 goals). Colorado Rapids: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Austin have significantly stronger home figures: they average 1.4 goals per match, with an xG of 1.43, while Colorado score just 0.91 goals away from home and create chances worth 0.95 xG. The hosts lose 30% of their home matches, whereas the visitors lose as many as 73% of their away games, with a -9 goal difference on the road. The Rapids’ away defence concedes an average of 1.73 goals and keeps a clean sheet in just 18% of matches, which favours Austin, who have failed to score in only 10% of their home fixtures. However, Colorado arrive on the back of 4 wins in their last 5 matches and have conceded just 3 goals during that period, so the draw remains a significant risk. Despite the visitors’ stronger recent run, Austin’s advantage in the quality of their home chances, 55% possession and their opponents’ poor away record all point towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No scenario is more likely primarily due to Colorado’s poor away finishing: the team averages just 0.83 goals scored away from home and fails to score in 50% of such matches. Austin concedes only 0.82 goals per home game and keeps a clean sheet in 55% of its home fixtures, which clearly limits the visitors’ chances of scoring. The seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are only 36% for Austin and 42% for Colorado, significantly below the league average of 62%. The hosts should have good conditions to score, as they create an average of 1.76 xG and Colorado concedes 1.83 goals away from home, but this does not guarantee a goal for the visitors. Austin’s last five matches produced BTTS in 80% of cases, but Colorado recorded no such match during the same period, strengthening the pick that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Austin score an average of 1.91 goals at home, while Colorado concede 1.83 away from home, which clearly supports the home side to score. However, the visitors are significantly weaker offensively on the road, averaging just 0.83 goals and 0.96 xG, while Austin allow an average of 1.00 xG and keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches. The overall profile does not point to an open game: 73% of Austin’s matches and 67% of Colorado’s games finished with Under 3.5 goals. In their last five appearances, both teams scored 1.2 and 0.8 goals per match respectively, further limiting the likelihood of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.45 goals gives a clear edge to the Under 3.5 goals option, with 1:0, 2:0 or 2:1 remaining realistic scoreline scenarios.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Austin win 73% of their matches and score an average of 1.91 goals, while Colorado lose 75% of their games, score just 0.83 goals, and concede 1.83. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in their attacking performance: their average xG is 1.76 compared with 0.96 for the visitors, while shots on target stand at 5.00 versus 2.92. Austin held a lead at the break in 36% of matches, while Colorado went into half-time behind in as many as 42% of games, supporting the scenario of the hosts leading at half-time. Even if the score is level at the break, a later Austin victory remains a strong scenario, as the hosts score an average of 1.36 goals after half-time, compared with just 0.33 for the Rapids. The 1/1 pick remains the most consistent, as Austin keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches, while Colorado fail to score in 50% of games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
AustinColorado Rapids
11Shots11
AustinColorado Rapids
2Shots on target5
AustinColorado Rapids
1.09xG1.18
AustinColorado Rapids
8Corners4
AustinColorado Rapids
34Dangerous attacks19
AustinColorado Rapids
8Fouls18
AustinColorado Rapids
0Cards2
AustinColorado Rapids

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AustinColorado Rapids
1.26Goals scored / match1.35
AustinColorado Rapids
1.83Goals conceded / match1.35
AustinColorado Rapids
49%Average possession56%
AustinColorado Rapids
4.13Shots on target / match3.91
AustinColorado Rapids

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.91Shots per match11.87
AustinColorado Rapids
4.13Shots on target3.91
AustinColorado Rapids
11.6%Shot conversion11.4%
AustinColorado Rapids
49%Possession56%
AustinColorado Rapids
1.26xG for1.34
AustinColorado Rapids
1.86xG against1.26
AustinColorado Rapids

Shooting quality

Austin: BalancedColorado Rapids: Balanced
AustinColorado Rapids
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Rapids is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Austin · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Austin
LWDWD
Season result split
26% W30% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Colorado Rapids
WWLWL
Season result split
43% W4% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-12
1.35 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Rapids is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Austin · 1.35 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Colorado Rapids is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Austin · 1.35 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Austin scoring profile: strong

Austin scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

29Goals scored (season)31
AustinColorado Rapids
42Goals conceded (season)31
AustinColorado Rapids
3.09Average goals in match2.7
AustinColorado Rapids
7Goals scored (last 5)4
AustinColorado Rapids
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
AustinColorado Rapids

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal70%
AustinColorado Rapids
39%2 goals30%
AustinColorado Rapids
9%3 goals13%
AustinColorado Rapids
0%4 goals13%
AustinColorado Rapids

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal65%
AustinColorado Rapids
57%2 goals43%
AustinColorado Rapids
26%3 goals26%
AustinColorado Rapids
9%4 goals0%
AustinColorado Rapids

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time22%
AustinColorado Rapids
9%BTTS in both halves0%
AustinColorado Rapids
26%Scored in both halves17%
AustinColorado Rapids

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AustinColorado Rapids
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
AustinColorado Rapids
100%BTTS - last 50%
AustinColorado Rapids

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
AustinColorado Rapids
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
AustinColorado Rapids
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
AustinColorado Rapids

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
AustinColorado Rapids
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
AustinColorado Rapids
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AustinColorado Rapids

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Austin · 1.17 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Austin - half-time state
26% leading48% draw26% trailing
Colorado Rapids - half-time state
26% leading39% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.17
AustinColorado Rapids
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.52
AustinColorado Rapids
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
AustinColorado Rapids
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.17
AustinColorado Rapids
48%Clean sheet before half-time57%
AustinColorado Rapids
48%No goal before half-time57%
AustinColorado Rapids

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.39
AustinColorado Rapids
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
AustinColorado Rapids
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
AustinColorado Rapids
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.52
AustinColorado Rapids
35%Clean sheet after half-time48%
AustinColorado Rapids
48%No goal after half-time57%
AustinColorado Rapids

Austin - second-half results

22% W39% D39% L
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

39% W22% D39% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Austin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
6
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
12
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
4
6
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

AustinLigaColorado Rapids
Average goals in match▼ 3.093.21▼ 2.70
Both teams scored▲ 65%63%▼ 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%62%▼ 48%
Clean sheets▼ 17%21%▲ 35%
Goal before half-time• 78%77%▼ 65%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%81%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado RapidsGoalPaxten Aaronson
  2. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Joshua AtencioOff: Youssef Maziz
  3. Colorado RapidsYellow cardJoshua Atencio
  4. Colorado RapidsYellow cardReginald Jacob Cannon
  5. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Georgi MinoungouOff: Donavan Gusto Phillip
  6. AustinSubstitutionOn: Przemysław PłachetaOff: Besard Sabovic

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Austin 0 - 0 - 1 Colorado Rapids. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Austin vs Colorado Rapids?

The MLS match finished Austin 1:1 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs Colorado Rapids?

Austin score 1.26 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 1.35. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Austin's matches and 39% of Colorado Rapids's.

What form are Austin and Colorado Rapids in?

Over the last 5 games Austin have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs Colorado Rapids?

The statistical background for Austin vs Colorado Rapids — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.