United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Austin vs Los Angeles FC: match statistics

Austin crest
Austin
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Los Angeles FC crest
Los Angeles FC
120%(3.40)
X25%(3.40)
255%(1.85)

Los Angeles FC showcases decisively better form with a 100% away record (4 wins in 4 matches) and an impressive goal difference of 8:0 this season. The visiting team dominates in terms of possession (71% on average) and xG (2.17 for vs 1.27 against), indicating a clear offensive and defensive superiority. Austin has earned only 0.8 points per match in their last 5 games, conceding as many as 11 goals, which points to serious defensive issues. The disparity in both teams' current disposition is significant - LAFC has won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Austin has lost 3 of their 5. Considering all statistics, an away victory appears to be the most likely scenario, although Austin's solid home form (50% win rate) and LAFC's relatively small sample of away matches leave some room for a surprise.

Austin vs Los Angeles FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin play Los Angeles FC in MLS (United States). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 01:45. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Austin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Los Angeles FC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin scores 1.38 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Los Angeles FC scores 1.76 and concedes 1.06. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin 63%, Los Angeles FC 41%. Over 2.5: Austin 75%, Los Angeles FC 59%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.23. Austin: 10.5 shots per match, Los Angeles FC: 14.1.

Match halves

Austin: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Austin: 76-90+ (9 goals). Los Angeles FC: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Los Angeles FC showcases decisively better form with a 100% away record (4 wins in 4 matches) and an impressive goal difference of 8:0 this season. The visiting team dominates in terms of possession (71% on average) and xG (2.17 for vs 1.27 against), indicating a clear offensive and defensive superiority. Austin has earned only 0.8 points per match in their last 5 games, conceding as many as 11 goals, which points to serious defensive issues. The disparity in both teams' current disposition is significant - LAFC has won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Austin has lost 3 of their 5. Considering all statistics, an away victory appears to be the most likely scenario, although Austin's solid home form (50% win rate) and LAFC's relatively small sample of away matches leave some room for a surprise.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
AustinLos Angeles FC
10Shots12
AustinLos Angeles FC
1Shots on target1
AustinLos Angeles FC
1.17xG1.04
AustinLos Angeles FC
5Corners4
AustinLos Angeles FC
63Dangerous attacks29
AustinLos Angeles FC
11Fouls7
AustinLos Angeles FC
3Cards2
AustinLos Angeles FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AustinLos Angeles FC
1.38Goals scored / match1.76
AustinLos Angeles FC
2Goals conceded / match1.06
AustinLos Angeles FC
48%Average possession46%
AustinLos Angeles FC
4Shots on target / match4.65
AustinLos Angeles FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match14.06
AustinLos Angeles FC
4Shots on target4.65
AustinLos Angeles FC
13.1%Shot conversion12.6%
AustinLos Angeles FC
48%Possession46%
AustinLos Angeles FC
1.23xG for1.58
AustinLos Angeles FC
1.99xG against1.44
AustinLos Angeles FC

Shooting quality

Austin: Efficient finishingLos Angeles FC: Counter-attacking
AustinLos Angeles FC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Austin · 1.8 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Austin
DLLLW
Season result split
25% W31% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-7
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Los Angeles FC
LLWWW
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Austin · 1.76 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Los Angeles FC is 89% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Austin · 1.06 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Austin scoring profile: mixed

Austin scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 59% (10 of 17 matches).

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

22Goals scored (season)30
AustinLos Angeles FC
32Goals conceded (season)18
AustinLos Angeles FC
3.38Average goals in match2.82
AustinLos Angeles FC
6Goals scored (last 5)10
AustinLos Angeles FC
13Goals conceded (last 5)6
AustinLos Angeles FC

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal88%
AustinLos Angeles FC
44%2 goals47%
AustinLos Angeles FC
13%3 goals24%
AustinLos Angeles FC
0%4 goals6%
AustinLos Angeles FC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal41%
AustinLos Angeles FC
69%2 goals35%
AustinLos Angeles FC
31%3 goals18%
AustinLos Angeles FC
13%4 goals12%
AustinLos Angeles FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time12%
AustinLos Angeles FC
13%BTTS in both halves6%
AustinLos Angeles FC
31%Scored in both halves29%
AustinLos Angeles FC

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
AustinLos Angeles FC
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
AustinLos Angeles FC
60%BTTS - last 560%
AustinLos Angeles FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
AustinLos Angeles FC
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
AustinLos Angeles FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
AustinLos Angeles FC

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
AustinLos Angeles FC
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
AustinLos Angeles FC
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
AustinLos Angeles FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - Austin · 1.29 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Austin - half-time state
31% leading50% draw19% trailing
Los Angeles FC - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.29
AustinLos Angeles FC
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.76
AustinLos Angeles FC
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
AustinLos Angeles FC
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.18
AustinLos Angeles FC
50%Clean sheet before half-time71%
AustinLos Angeles FC
38%No goal before half-time59%
AustinLos Angeles FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.82
AustinLos Angeles FC
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)1
AustinLos Angeles FC
1.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
AustinLos Angeles FC
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.65
AustinLos Angeles FC
31%Clean sheet after half-time59%
AustinLos Angeles FC
50%No goal after half-time24%
AustinLos Angeles FC

Austin - second-half results

19% W31% R50% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Austin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

AustinLigaLos Angeles FC
Average goals in match 3.383.30 2.82
Both teams scored 63%62% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%63% 59%
Clean sheets 25%21% 59%
Goal before half-time 81%77% 59%
Goal after half-time 88%81% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Austin vs Los Angeles FC?

The MLS match finished Austin 0:0 Los Angeles FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs Los Angeles FC?

Austin score 1.38 goals per game on average and Los Angeles FC 1.76. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Austin's matches and 41% of Los Angeles FC's.

What form are Austin and Los Angeles FC in?

Over the last 5 games Austin have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Los Angeles FC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs Los Angeles FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.