United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Austin vs Minnesota United: match statistics

Austin crest
Austin
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Minnesota United crest
Minnesota United
135%(2.38)
X35%(3.54)
230%(3.05)

Analysis of the last five matches of both teams indicates a balanced situation, although both sides are in poor form. Austin has collected only 3 points (1 win, 4 losses) with a goal difference of 5:11, resulting in a PPG of 0.6. Minnesota United fares even worse with 2 points (2 draws, 3 losses) and a goal difference of 6:10, achieving a PPG of 0.4. The form of both teams is unstable – Austin has lost four of their last five matches, while Minnesota has not won any game in that period. Considering the home advantage and the slightly better points form, I predict a slight advantage for Austin; however, the weakness of both teams in defense and offense makes a draw equally probable. The match could be evenly contested and end in a share of the points.

Austin vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin play Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The match date is 22 February 2026 at 02:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Austin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Minnesota United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin scores 1.27 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Minnesota United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.47. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin 60%, Minnesota United 53%. Over 2.5: Austin 73%, Minnesota United 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.21. Austin: 10.5 shots per match, Minnesota United: 13.1.

Match halves

Austin: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.60. Minnesota United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Austin: 76-90+ (7 goals). Minnesota United: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Analysis of the last five matches of both teams indicates a balanced situation, although both sides are in poor form. Austin has collected only 3 points (1 win, 4 losses) with a goal difference of 5:11, resulting in a PPG of 0.6. Minnesota United fares even worse with 2 points (2 draws, 3 losses) and a goal difference of 6:10, achieving a PPG of 0.4. The form of both teams is unstable – Austin has lost four of their last five matches, while Minnesota has not won any game in that period. Considering the home advantage and the slightly better points form, I predict a slight advantage for Austin; however, the weakness of both teams in defense and offense makes a draw equally probable. The match could be evenly contested and end in a share of the points.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
AustinMinnesota United
10Shots11
AustinMinnesota United
6Shots on target4
AustinMinnesota United
1.41xG1.22
AustinMinnesota United
7Corners8
AustinMinnesota United
49Dangerous attacks33
AustinMinnesota United
8Fouls16
AustinMinnesota United
1Cards1
AustinMinnesota United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AustinMinnesota United
1.27Goals scored / match1.2
AustinMinnesota United
2.07Goals conceded / match1.47
AustinMinnesota United
47%Average possession47%
AustinMinnesota United
3.87Shots on target / match4.4
AustinMinnesota United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.53Shots per match13.13
AustinMinnesota United
3.87Shots on target4.4
AustinMinnesota United
12%Shot conversion9.1%
AustinMinnesota United
47%Possession47%
AustinMinnesota United
1.21xG for1.47
AustinMinnesota United
2.03xG against1.45
AustinMinnesota United

Shooting quality

Austin: Counter-attackingMinnesota United: Balanced
AustinMinnesota United
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Austin · 1 pts / match - Minnesota United

Austin
WDLLL
Season result split
20% W33% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-7
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Minnesota United
WDLLD
Season result split
40% W27% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-5
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Austin · 1.2 goals / match - Minnesota United

Minnesota United is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Austin · 1.47 goals / match - Minnesota United

Austin scoring profile: very strong

Austin scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

19Goals scored (season)18
AustinMinnesota United
31Goals conceded (season)22
AustinMinnesota United
3.33Average goals in match2.67
AustinMinnesota United
5Goals scored (last 5)7
AustinMinnesota United
12Goals conceded (last 5)8
AustinMinnesota United

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal73%
AustinMinnesota United
40%2 goals40%
AustinMinnesota United
7%3 goals7%
AustinMinnesota United
0%4 goals0%
AustinMinnesota United

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
AustinMinnesota United
73%2 goals40%
AustinMinnesota United
33%3 goals13%
AustinMinnesota United
13%4 goals7%
AustinMinnesota United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time27%
AustinMinnesota United
13%BTTS in both halves7%
AustinMinnesota United
27%Scored in both halves13%
AustinMinnesota United

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
AustinMinnesota United
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
AustinMinnesota United
40%BTTS - last 580%
AustinMinnesota United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
AustinMinnesota United
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AustinMinnesota United
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
AustinMinnesota United

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
AustinMinnesota United
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
AustinMinnesota United
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
AustinMinnesota United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Austin · 0.93 pts / match - Minnesota United

Austin - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing
Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)0.93
AustinMinnesota United
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.47
AustinMinnesota United
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
AustinMinnesota United
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.4
AustinMinnesota United
53%Clean sheet before half-time33%
AustinMinnesota United
40%No goal before half-time60%
AustinMinnesota United

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.6
AustinMinnesota United
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
AustinMinnesota United
1.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
AustinMinnesota United
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.27
AustinMinnesota United
27%Clean sheet after half-time53%
AustinMinnesota United
53%No goal after half-time53%
AustinMinnesota United

Austin - second-half results

13% W33% R53% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Minnesota United - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Austin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

AustinLigaMinnesota United
Average goals in match 3.333.30 2.67
Both teams scored 60%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%62% 53%
Clean sheets 27%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 80%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Austin 0 - 1 - 0 Minnesota United. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Austin vs Minnesota United?

The MLS match finished Austin 2:2 Minnesota United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs Minnesota United?

Austin score 1.27 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 1.20. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Austin's matches and 53% of Minnesota United's.

What form are Austin and Minnesota United in?

Over the last 5 games Austin have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Minnesota United 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs Minnesota United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Austin vs Minnesota United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.