United States - MLSQ2 StadiumData current as of 14 October 2026

Austin vs San Diego: match statistics

Austin crest
Austin
3 : 3half-time 0:0
San Diego crest
San Diego

Austin vs San Diego: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin played San Diego in MLS (United States). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: Q2 Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Austin: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. San Diego: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin scores 1.23 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. San Diego scores 1.69 and concedes 1.69. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin 65%, San Diego 54%. Over 2.5: Austin 65%, San Diego 65%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

San Diego has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.22. Austin: 10.5 shots per match, San Diego: 11.7.

Match halves

Austin: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.69. San Diego: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Austin: 76-90+ (13 goals). San Diego: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Austin remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws while conceding just 4 goals during that period, whereas San Diego have lost 3 of their last 5 fixtures and conceded 12 goals. At home, the hosts average 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded, while the visitors score just 1.00 and concede 1.67 goals per away match. Austin’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.41 compared with San Diego’s 1.20, while Austin’s opponents generate an average of 1.34 xG compared with the 1.60 xG allowed by the visitors. Austin register 4.58 shots on target per home match, clearly more than San Diego’s 3.17 away from home, while the visitors fail to score in 33% of their away fixtures. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Austin draw 42% of their home matches, but San Diego’s poor away scoring record and defensive issues point towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Austin records BTTS in 57% of matches, while San Diego stands at 50%; however, current form clearly strengthens the scenario of goals at both ends, with the figures rising to 80% and 60%, respectively, over the last five games. The hosts are highly dangerous at home, scoring an average of 2.29 goals while conceding 1.71, whereas San Diego concedes as many as 1.67 goals per away match. Austin averages 1.54 xG and 5.64 shots on target, while the visitors’ defence allows opponents 1.60 xG. San Diego scores just 1.00 goal away from home, but Austin has allowed opponents 1.53 xG across its last five appearances, giving the visitors a realistic chance of finding the net. The BTTS - Yes pick is also supported by San Diego’s poor recent defensive record, having conceded 12 goals in five matches, so the hosts should contribute a goal of their own.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Austin average 2.29 goals per home game, while San Diego concede 1.67 per away match, creating favorable conditions for the hosts. The visitors have conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five games, or 2.4 per match, with an average xG allowed of 1.77. Austin have managed only 1.2 goals per game across their last five matches, but San Diego scored 1.4 times per match during this period, while the hosts allowed opponents an xG of 1.53. At least two goals were scored in 93% of Austin’s matches and 58% of San Diego’s, while MLS averages 3.21 goals per game. The strongest signal is therefore Over 1.5, as even with a cautious projection of 2.80 goals, the risk of a very low-scoring game remains limited.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Austin held the lead at the break in 43% of their matches, while San Diego were trailing at half-time in as many as 42% of games and scored just 0.58 goals per match before the interval. The hosts also hold a clear edge in the quality of chances created: their average xG is 1.54 compared with 1.20 for the visitors, while they average 5.64 shots on target against San Diego’s 3.17. After the break, Austin score an average of 1.29 goals, whereas San Diego manage only 0.42, further supporting the scenario in which the hosts maintain or extend their advantage. Over the course of the season, Austin win 43% of their matches, while San Diego lose 50%; additionally, the visitors have conceded an average of 2.4 goals in their last five appearances. The most likely outcome is therefore Austin taking the lead before half-time and securing the win by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
AustinSan Diego
13Shots15
AustinSan Diego
6Shots on target5
AustinSan Diego
1.46xG1.52
AustinSan Diego
4Corners1
AustinSan Diego
30Dangerous attacks31
AustinSan Diego
11Fouls6
AustinSan Diego
1Cards0
AustinSan Diego

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match1.69
AustinSan Diego
1.69Goals conceded / match1.69
AustinSan Diego
49%Average possession60%
AustinSan Diego
3.92Shots on target / match4.5
AustinSan Diego

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.54Shots per match11.73
AustinSan Diego
3.92Shots on target4.5
AustinSan Diego
11.7%Shot conversion14.4%
AustinSan Diego
49%Possession60%
AustinSan Diego
1.22xG for1.38
AustinSan Diego
1.84xG against1.49
AustinSan Diego

Shooting quality

Austin: BalancedSan Diego: Efficient finishing
AustinSan Diego
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Austin · 0.8 pts / match - San Diego

Austin
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W35% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-10
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
San Diego
WLLLD
Season result split
31% W27% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-11
1.19 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Diego is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Austin · 1.69 goals / match - San Diego

Austin scoring profile: very strong

Austin scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

San Diego scoring profile: very strong

San Diego scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

32Goals scored (season)44
AustinSan Diego
44Goals conceded (season)44
AustinSan Diego
2.92Average goals in match3.38
AustinSan Diego
6Goals scored (last 5)7
AustinSan Diego
4Goals conceded (last 5)12
AustinSan Diego

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal81%
AustinSan Diego
38%2 goals50%
AustinSan Diego
8%3 goals23%
AustinSan Diego
0%4 goals8%
AustinSan Diego

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal73%
AustinSan Diego
50%2 goals50%
AustinSan Diego
23%3 goals31%
AustinSan Diego
8%4 goals12%
AustinSan Diego

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time35%
AustinSan Diego
8%BTTS in both halves15%
AustinSan Diego
27%Scored in both halves46%
AustinSan Diego

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
AustinSan Diego
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
AustinSan Diego
80%BTTS - last 560%
AustinSan Diego

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
AustinSan Diego
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
AustinSan Diego
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
AustinSan Diego

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AustinSan Diego
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
AustinSan Diego
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
AustinSan Diego

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Diego is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Austin · 1.35 pts / match - San Diego

Austin - half-time state
27% leading46% draw27% trailing
San Diego - half-time state
35% leading31% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.35
AustinSan Diego
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.81
AustinSan Diego
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
AustinSan Diego
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.73
AustinSan Diego
50%Clean sheet before half-time42%
AustinSan Diego
50%No goal before half-time35%
AustinSan Diego

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AustinSan Diego
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
AustinSan Diego
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
AustinSan Diego
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.65
AustinSan Diego
38%Clean sheet after half-time54%
AustinSan Diego
46%No goal after half-time38%
AustinSan Diego

Austin - second-half results

23% W42% D35% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Diego - second-half results

38% W35% D27% L
35
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Austin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
San Diego - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
5
7
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
13
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

San Diego
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
5
6
16-30
8
10
31-45
9
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

San Diego

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

AustinLigaSan Diego
Average goals in match▼ 2.923.21▲ 3.38
Both teams scored▲ 65%63%▼ 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 65%63%▲ 65%
Clean sheets▼ 19%21%▲ 27%
Goal before half-time• 77%77%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time• 81%82%• 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AustinSubstitutionOn: Oleksandr SvatokOff: Žan Kolmanič
  2. San DiegoSubstitutionOn: Cédric BakambuOff: David Vazquez
  3. AustinGoalMikkel Desler
  4. AustinYellow cardChristian Ramu00edrez
  5. San DiegoSubstitutionOn: Bi Voli ZambléOff: Aníbal Casis Godoy Lemus

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Austin 0 - 0 - 1 San Diego. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Austin vs San Diego?

The MLS match finished Austin 3:3 San Diego. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs San Diego?

Austin score 1.23 goals per game on average and San Diego 1.69. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Austin's matches and 54% of San Diego's.

What form are Austin and San Diego in?

Over the last 5 games Austin have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and San Diego 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs San Diego?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.