Avispa Fukuoka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Avispa Fukuoka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Avispa Fukuoka play Sanfrecce Hiroshima in J1 League (Japan). The match date is 19 September 2026.
Current form
Avispa Fukuoka: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sanfrecce Hiroshima: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Avispa Fukuoka scores 1.29 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Sanfrecce Hiroshima scores 2.71 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Avispa Fukuoka 57%, Sanfrecce Hiroshima 57%. Over 2.5: Avispa Fukuoka 57%, Sanfrecce Hiroshima 71%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Sanfrecce Hiroshima has higher xG: 2.21 vs 1.58. Avispa Fukuoka: 14.3 shots per match, Sanfrecce Hiroshima: 19.7.
Match halves
Avispa Fukuoka: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.57. Sanfrecce Hiroshima: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.57.
Goals by minute
Avispa Fukuoka: 31-45+ (4 goals). Sanfrecce Hiroshima: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Avispa Fukuoka | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sanfrecce Hiroshima is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Avispa Fukuoka · 1.6 pts / match - Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanfrecce Hiroshima is 110% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Avispa Fukuoka · 2.71 goals / match - Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Sanfrecce Hiroshima is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.57 goals / match - Avispa Fukuoka · 0.86 goals / match - Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Avispa Fukuoka scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Sanfrecce Hiroshima keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Sanfrecce Hiroshima scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Avispa Fukuoka
Over / Under - Sanfrecce Hiroshima
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanfrecce Hiroshima is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Avispa Fukuoka · 2 pts / match - Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sanfrecce Hiroshima - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Avispa Fukuoka
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Avispa Fukuoka | Liga | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.86 | 2.97 | ▲ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 86% | 86% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Avispa Fukuoka 1 - 0 - 3 Sanfrecce Hiroshima. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
When do Avispa Fukuoka and Sanfrecce Hiroshima play?
Avispa Fukuoka face Sanfrecce Hiroshima on 19 September 2026 in J1 League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Avispa Fukuoka and Sanfrecce Hiroshima?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Avispa Fukuoka won 1, Sanfrecce Hiroshima won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Avispa Fukuoka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima?
Avispa Fukuoka score 1.29 goals per game on average and Sanfrecce Hiroshima 2.71. The J1 League average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Avispa Fukuoka's matches and 57% of Sanfrecce Hiroshima's.
What form are Avispa Fukuoka and Sanfrecce Hiroshima in?
Over the last 5 games Avispa Fukuoka have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sanfrecce Hiroshima 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Avispa Fukuoka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.