Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

Ayia Napa crest
Ayia Napa
0 : 2half-time 0:2
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams. Ayia Napa shows poor home form with only a 30% win rate and a 50% loss rate at home, conceding an average of 0.9 goals per match with low offensive efficiency (0.6 goals/match). MEAP Nisou boasts better offensive stats on the road (1.09 goals/match, 4.1 shots on target) and higher ball possession (53%), but their defense raises concerns (1.36 goals conceded/match). Both teams have an identical -3 goal difference in their matches and the exact same form over their last 5 games (0.8 points/match). Considering the hosts' weak disposition in home matches (60% of games without scoring a goal) and the visitors' tendency to draw away (27%), a sharing of points seems to be the most probable outcome.

Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ayia Napa play MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Ayia Napa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ayia Napa scores 1.50 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ayia Napa 43%, MEAP Nisou 48%. Over 2.5: Ayia Napa 46%, MEAP Nisou 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.22. Ayia Napa: 4.0 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 7.5.

Match halves

Ayia Napa: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.93. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Ayia Napa: 76-90+ (16 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams. Ayia Napa shows poor home form with only a 30% win rate and a 50% loss rate at home, conceding an average of 0.9 goals per match with low offensive efficiency (0.6 goals/match). MEAP Nisou boasts better offensive stats on the road (1.09 goals/match, 4.1 shots on target) and higher ball possession (53%), but their defense raises concerns (1.36 goals conceded/match). Both teams have an identical -3 goal difference in their matches and the exact same form over their last 5 games (0.8 points/match). Considering the hosts' weak disposition in home matches (60% of games without scoring a goal) and the visitors' tendency to draw away (27%), a sharing of points seems to be the most probable outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
6Shots16
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
3Shots on target4
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.03xG1.82
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
5Corners10
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
60Dangerous attacks75
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.07
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.46Goals conceded / match1.72
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
26%Average possession40%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.54Shots on target / match2.9
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4Shots per match7.55
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.54Shots on target2.9
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
37.5%Shot conversion14.2%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
26%Possession40%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.22xG for1.42
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.29xG against1.48
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

Ayia Napa: Counter-attackingMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.970.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ayia Napa is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ayia Napa · 0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

Ayia Napa
LDLWW
Season result split
39% W29% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-9
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%
MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ayia Napa is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Ayia Napa · 1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

Ayia Napa is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Ayia Napa · 1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

Ayia Napa scoring profile: strong

Ayia Napa scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: strong

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Ayia Napa keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).

42Goals scored (season)31
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
41Goals conceded (season)50
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
2.96Average goals in match2.79
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
14Goals scored (last 5)5
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
14Goals conceded (last 5)10
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal66%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
46%2 goals28%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
21%3 goals10%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
11%4 goals3%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
50%2 goals52%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
18%3 goals24%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
4%4 goals10%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time31%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
11%BTTS in both halves3%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
29%Scored in both halves17%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MEAP Nisou is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - Ayia Napa · 1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

Ayia Napa - half-time state
11% leading54% draw36% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.03
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.52
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
43%Clean sheet before half-time34%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
61%No goal before half-time52%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)0.93
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1.28
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
68%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou
50%No goal after half-time66%
Ayia NapaMEAP Nisou

Ayia Napa - second-half results

39% W39% R21% P
24
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding355%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ayia Napa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match2.00.8
Average goals in match3.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ayia Napa
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
6
8
16-30
4
14
31-45
3
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
16
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ayia Napa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Ayia NapaLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals in match 2.962.72 2.79
Both teams scored 43%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%49% 48%
Clean sheets 29%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 64%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 68%77% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ayia Napa 1 - 0 - 1 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

MEAP Nisou
0 : 2
Ayia Napa
MEAP Nisou
2 : 0
Ayia Napa

FAQ

What was the result of Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished Ayia Napa 0:2 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ayia Napa and MEAP Nisou?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ayia Napa won 1, MEAP Nisou won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou?

Ayia Napa score 1.50 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.07. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ayia Napa's matches and 48% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are Ayia Napa and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games Ayia Napa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ayia Napa vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.