Netherlands - EredivisieData current as of 11 September 2026

AZ vs Excelsior: match statistics

AZ crest
AZ
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Excelsior crest
Excelsior
165%(1.32)
X20%(5.86)
215%(9.00)

AZ demonstrates a decisive advantage at home, winning 50% of matches with just 13% losses and scoring an average of 2.38 goals per game. The hosts boast superior offensive statistics (xG 1.98 vs 1.35) as well as defensive figures (averaging 1.88 goals conceded vs 2.75 for Excelsior away). Excelsior holds a dismal away record—63% losses, zero clean sheets, and a negative goal difference of -13—which, combined with only 25% away wins, clearly positions them as the outsider. While the form of both teams over the last five matches is balanced (1.4 points per match each), the disparity between AZ's home efficiency and Excelsior's away frailty decisively favors the hosts. The high average goal count in AZ's home games (4.25) and Excelsior's vulnerability to conceding suggest a confident victory for the hosts.

AZ vs Excelsior: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AZ played Excelsior in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 21 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

AZ: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Excelsior: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

AZ scores 1.83 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Excelsior scores 1.06 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AZ 72%, Excelsior 61%. Over 2.5: AZ 72%, Excelsior 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

AZ has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.33. AZ: 16.6 shots per match, Excelsior: 11.9.

Match halves

AZ: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.72. Excelsior: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

AZ: 31-45+ (9 goals). Excelsior: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AZ demonstrates a decisive advantage at home, winning 50% of matches with just 13% losses and scoring an average of 2.38 goals per game. The hosts boast superior offensive statistics (xG 1.98 vs 1.35) as well as defensive figures (averaging 1.88 goals conceded vs 2.75 for Excelsior away). Excelsior holds a dismal away record—63% losses, zero clean sheets, and a negative goal difference of -13—which, combined with only 25% away wins, clearly positions them as the outsider. While the form of both teams over the last five matches is balanced (1.4 points per match each), the disparity between AZ's home efficiency and Excelsior's away frailty decisively favors the hosts. The high average goal count in AZ's home games (4.25) and Excelsior's vulnerability to conceding suggest a confident victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
AZExcelsior
13Shots8
AZExcelsior
4Shots on target2
AZExcelsior
1.53xG0.91
AZExcelsior
4Corners5
AZExcelsior
58Dangerous attacks36
AZExcelsior
8Fouls10
AZExcelsior
3Cards1
AZExcelsior

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.06
AZExcelsior
1.72Goals conceded / match1.89
AZExcelsior
54%Average possession46%
AZExcelsior
6.17Shots on target / match4.11
AZExcelsior

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.61Shots per match11.94
AZExcelsior
6.17Shots on target4.11
AZExcelsior
11%Shot conversion8.8%
AZExcelsior
54%Possession46%
AZExcelsior
1.84xG for1.33
AZExcelsior
1.43xG against1.88
AZExcelsior

Shooting quality

AZ: AttackingExcelsior: Balanced
AZExcelsior
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Excelsior is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - AZ · 1.4 pts / match - Excelsior

AZ
LDLWL
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-6
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Excelsior
WLWLD
Season result split
33% W11% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-10
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AZ is 73% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - AZ · 1.06 goals / match - Excelsior

AZ is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - AZ · 1.89 goals / match - Excelsior

AZ scoring profile: very strong

AZ scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Excelsior keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

Excelsior scoring profile: very strong

Excelsior scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while AZ keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

33Goals scored (season)19
AZExcelsior
31Goals conceded (season)34
AZExcelsior
3.56Average goals in match2.94
AZExcelsior
7Goals scored (last 5)6
AZExcelsior
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
AZExcelsior

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal78%
AZExcelsior
56%2 goals28%
AZExcelsior
22%3 goals0%
AZExcelsior
11%4 goals0%
AZExcelsior

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
AZExcelsior
50%2 goals61%
AZExcelsior
28%3 goals17%
AZExcelsior
11%4 goals17%
AZExcelsior

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time28%
AZExcelsior
17%BTTS in both halves0%
AZExcelsior
33%Scored in both halves22%
AZExcelsior

BTTS and goal count

72%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
AZExcelsior
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
AZExcelsior
60%BTTS - last 560%
AZExcelsior

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
AZExcelsior
72%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AZExcelsior
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
AZExcelsior

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
AZExcelsior
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AZExcelsior
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AZExcelsior

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - AZ · 1.39 pts / match - Excelsior

AZ - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing
Excelsior - half-time state
33% leading39% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.39
AZExcelsior
1.11Goals scored (1st half)0.61
AZExcelsior
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
AZExcelsior
2Average goals (1st half)1.33
AZExcelsior
39%Clean sheet before half-time61%
AZExcelsior
33%No goal before half-time39%
AZExcelsior

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)0.83
AZExcelsior
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
AZExcelsior
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
AZExcelsior
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.61
AZExcelsior
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
AZExcelsior
39%No goal after half-time61%
AZExcelsior

AZ - second-half results

28% W39% D33% L
28
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Excelsior - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AZ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Excelsior - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AZ
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
4
16-30
9
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
5
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Excelsior
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
9
46-60
1
6
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AZ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Excelsior

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

AZLigaExcelsior
Average goals in match 3.563.28 2.94
Both teams scored 72%63% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%63% 67%
Clean sheets 22%19% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%85% 72%
Goal after half-time 89%86% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.49
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AZSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim SadiqOff: Weslley Pinto Batista
  2. AZSubstitutionOn: Ro-Zangelo DaalOff: Isak Jensen
  3. ExcelsiorSubstitutionOn: Gyan de RegtOff: Emil Hansson
  4. ExcelsiorYellow cardGyan de Regt
  5. AZYellow cardElijah Dijkstra
  6. ExcelsiorSubstitutionOn: Adam CarlénOff: Lewis Schouten
  7. AZYellow cardPeer Koopmeiners

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alex BosMatches officiated: 17
3.65Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 228%Home wins47%Draws24%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of AZ vs Excelsior?

The Eredivisie match finished AZ 1:1 Excelsior. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AZ vs Excelsior?

AZ score 1.83 goals per game on average and Excelsior 1.06. The Eredivisie average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 72% of AZ's matches and 61% of Excelsior's.

What form are AZ and Excelsior in?

Over the last 5 games AZ have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Excelsior 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ vs Excelsior?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AZ vs Excelsior: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.