AZ vs NAC Breda: match statistics
AZ vs NAC Breda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AZ played NAC Breda in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: AFAS Stadion. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
AZ: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. NAC Breda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
AZ scores 1.67 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. NAC Breda scores 0.97 and concedes 1.67. League average: 3.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AZ 64%, NAC Breda 45%. Over 2.5: AZ 64%, NAC Breda 48%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
AZ has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.50. AZ: 15.8 shots per match, NAC Breda: 14.0.
Match halves
AZ: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.76. NAC Breda: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
AZ: 0-15 (13 goals). NAC Breda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eredivisie: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AZ is the clear favorite: at home they score an average of 2.25 goals and have a goal difference of +13, while NAC score only 0.75 goals on average away with a -20 goal difference. In the last 5 matches AZ scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) and remain unbeaten in that period (1 win, 4 draws), averaging 1.4 points per match, whereas NAC have 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 per match) and average 1.0 point per match. In terms of chance quality AZ generate at home an average xG of 1.81 versus opponents’ xG 1.27 and register 6.13 shots on target per game, while NAC average only 3.56 shots on target and xG 1.39 on the road; the home conversion rate is 14% compared to 6% for the visitors. NAC’s away defense concedes an average of 2.0 goals per match, and the visitors fail to score in 50% of away games, while AZ have no matches without a goal at home (0% scoreless games), which substantially increases the hosts’ scoring probability. Considering the superiority in effectiveness (2.25 vs 0.75 goals), better xG and shots on target metrics and league position (6th vs 17th), I predict an AZ win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS at 60% (Yes) vs 40% (No), because AZ has BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and averages 2.0 goals, while NAC has BTTS in only 20% of those 5 matches and scores 0.6 goals. Season metrics show AZ scores 1.18 goals and has xG 1.6 per game, while NAC scores only 0.75 and concedes 2.0 on average with xG against 1.58, so the home side looks a realistic candidate to score. NAC, however, has a low shot conversion of 6% despite a recent xG of 1.61, which indicates the visitors create chances but finish poorly. Additionally the league has an overall BTTS of 63% and NAC has only 13% clean sheets, so league conditions and the visitors’ weak defense increase the probability of both teams scoring, hence the pick: "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate AZ will generate around 1.59 xG and NAC Breda 1.39 xG, totaling 2.98 expected goals. Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: AZ 65% and NAC 75% (avg. 70%), and both sides have 94% of matches with at least one goal (over 0.5), which reduces the risk of a very low-scoring affair. AZ averages 14.88 shots and 4.41 on target with an 8% conversion, NAC 13.13 shots and 3.56 on target with a 6% conversion — combined about 7.97 shots on target, supporting a total xG close to 3.0. Seasonal over 2.5 is 41% for AZ and 56% for NAC, while the league average for matches over 2.5 is 62%; additionally AZ scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg.) versus 3 goals (0.6) for NAC, so although NAC has 0% over2.5 in the last 5, AZ’s offensive edge and the combined xG lean toward over 2.5. Based on this, I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the strongest signal — the expected 2.98 goals together with a high volume of shots and xG increase the probability of exceeding that line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
AZ are the favorites: they score on average 1.18 goals per match versus NAC’s 0.75 and have a higher xG (1.60 vs 1.39); NAC concedes an average of 2.0 goals per game and allows 1.58 xG, which increases the hosts’ chances. At Half-Time AZ averages 0.53 goals and NAC 0.31; AZ led at the break in 24% of matches this season and in 40% of their last five games, so I estimate about a 40% probability of AZ leading after 45 minutes. Given NAC’s low effectiveness (6% win rate this season), AZ’s higher shots on target (4.41 vs 3.56) and superior conversion rate (8% vs 6%), the most likely scenario is AZ leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time (1/1) with a probability of roughly 31%. Alternative relevant scenarios are draws: draw at Half-Time and AZ win at Full-Time (X/1) I assess at 18%, draw at Half-Time and Full-Time (X/X) at 18%, and the combined probability of a NAC victory is about 9%, consistent with their poor win record and average goals conceded.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AZ | NAC Breda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AZ is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - AZ · 1 pts / match - NAC Breda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AZ is 72% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - AZ · 0.97 goals / match - NAC Breda
AZ is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - AZ · 1.67 goals / match - NAC Breda
AZ scores in 88% of matches (29 of 33 matches), while NAC Breda keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
NAC Breda scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while AZ keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AZ
Over / Under - NAC Breda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AZ is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - AZ · 0.97 pts / match - NAC Breda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AZ - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
NAC Breda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 18%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AZ
NAC Breda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| AZ | Liga | NAC Breda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.12 | 3.17 | ▼ 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 62% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 20% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: AZ 1 - 0 - 0 NAC Breda. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AZ vs NAC Breda?
The Eredivisie match finished AZ 3:3 NAC Breda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AZ vs NAC Breda?
AZ score 1.67 goals per game on average and NAC Breda 0.97. The Eredivisie average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 64% of AZ's matches and 45% of NAC Breda's.
What form are AZ and NAC Breda in?
Over the last 5 games AZ have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and NAC Breda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ vs NAC Breda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AZ vs NAC Breda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


