Netherlands - EredivisieData current as of 11 September 2026

AZ vs NEC: match statistics

AZ crest
AZ
1 : 3half-time 1:2
NEC crest
NEC
135%(1.77)
X35%(4.06)
230%(4.00)

The match promises to be extremely tight, which favors a draw. AZ has a solid home record with 44% wins and only 11% losses at home, but their average goals conceded (1.78) indicates defensive frailties. NEC is in excellent form with four wins in their last five matches and an impressive average of 2.4 goals per away game, though they have failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road. Both teams have an identical goal difference (+4) in their matches, and the xG statistics are very close (AZ 1.93 vs NEC 1.91). AZ's high percentage of draws at home (44%) combined with NEC drawing 30% of their away matches further supports the scenario of a share of the points. I anticipate an open, high-scoring affair ending in a draw.

AZ vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AZ played NEC in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

AZ: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. NEC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

AZ scores 1.75 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. NEC scores 2.58 and concedes 1.74. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AZ 70%, NEC 79%. Over 2.5: AZ 65%, NEC 84%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

NEC has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.80. AZ: 16.2 shots per match, NEC: 15.4.

Match halves

AZ: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.75. NEC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.68.

Goals by minute

AZ: 31-45+ (9 goals). NEC: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be extremely tight, which favors a draw. AZ has a solid home record with 44% wins and only 11% losses at home, but their average goals conceded (1.78) indicates defensive frailties. NEC is in excellent form with four wins in their last five matches and an impressive average of 2.4 goals per away game, though they have failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road. Both teams have an identical goal difference (+4) in their matches, and the xG statistics are very close (AZ 1.93 vs NEC 1.91). AZ's high percentage of draws at home (44%) combined with NEC drawing 30% of their away matches further supports the scenario of a share of the points. I anticipate an open, high-scoring affair ending in a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
AZNEC
11Shots19
AZNEC
2Shots on target8
AZNEC
1.06xG2.16
AZNEC
3Corners3
AZNEC
31Dangerous attacks54
AZNEC
15Fouls16
AZNEC
1Cards2
AZNEC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match2.58
AZNEC
1.6Goals conceded / match1.74
AZNEC
54%Average possession56%
AZNEC
5.95Shots on target / match6.63
AZNEC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.2Shots per match15.42
AZNEC
5.95Shots on target6.63
AZNEC
10.8%Shot conversion16.7%
AZNEC
54%Possession56%
AZNEC
1.8xG for1.82
AZNEC
1.4xG against1.37
AZNEC

Shooting quality

AZ: AttackingNEC: Dominant
AZNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - AZ · 2.2 pts / match - NEC

AZ
LWLDW
Season result split
45% W25% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-6
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
NEC
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W26% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-4
1.84 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - AZ · 2.58 goals / match - NEC

AZ is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - AZ · 1.74 goals / match - NEC

AZ scoring profile: very strong

AZ scores in 95% of matches (19 of 20 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 95% of matches (18 of 19 matches), while AZ keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

35Goals scored (season)49
AZNEC
32Goals conceded (season)33
AZNEC
3.35Average goals in match4.32
AZNEC
7Goals scored (last 5)13
AZNEC
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
AZNEC

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal95%
AZNEC
50%2 goals89%
AZNEC
20%3 goals47%
AZNEC
10%4 goals21%
AZNEC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal84%
AZNEC
45%2 goals53%
AZNEC
25%3 goals26%
AZNEC
10%4 goals5%
AZNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time53%
AZNEC
15%BTTS in both halves37%
AZNEC
30%Scored in both halves74%
AZNEC

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS74%
AZNEC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AZNEC
60%BTTS - last 5100%
AZNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time95%
AZNEC
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
AZNEC
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
AZNEC

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
AZNEC
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time79%
AZNEC
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
AZNEC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - AZ · 1.32 pts / match - NEC

AZ - half-time state
35% leading45% draw20% trailing
NEC - half-time state
32% leading37% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.32
AZNEC
1Goals scored (1st half)0.89
AZNEC
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
AZNEC
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.79
AZNEC
45%Clean sheet before half-time32%
AZNEC
40%No goal before half-time21%
AZNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.79
AZNEC
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.68
AZNEC
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
AZNEC
1.55Average goals (2nd half)2.53
AZNEC
35%Clean sheet after half-time37%
AZNEC
35%No goal after half-time11%
AZNEC

AZ - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
30
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NEC - second-half results

42% W53% D5% L
25
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AZ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AZ
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
4
16-30
9
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

NEC
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
10
4
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
90%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AZ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.76
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
176%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

AZLigaNEC
Average goals in match 3.353.25 4.32
Both teams scored 70%63% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%62% 84%
Clean sheets 25%20% 16%
Goal before half-time 75%84% 95%
Goal after half-time 90%84% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NECYellow cardNoé Lebreton
  2. NECGoalBasar OnalAssist: Kodai Sano
  3. NECGoalKodai Sano
  4. AZYellow cardMees De Wit
  5. NECSubstitutionOn: Brayann PereiraOff: Sami Ouaissa
  6. NECYellow cardKodai Sano
  7. NECSubstitutionOn: Virgil MisidjanOff: Basar Onal
  8. NECSubstitutionOn: Youssef El KachatiOff: Tjaronn Chery

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Serdar GözübüyükMatches officiated: 17
4.12Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 241%Home wins18%Draws41%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AZ 0 - 0 - 1 NEC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie
2 : 1
Alkmaar Zaanstreek

FAQ

What was the result of AZ vs NEC?

The Eredivisie match finished AZ 1:3 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AZ vs NEC?

AZ score 1.75 goals per game on average and NEC 2.58. The Eredivisie average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 70% of AZ's matches and 79% of NEC's.

What form are AZ and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games AZ have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and NEC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ vs NEC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AZ vs NEC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.