Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Azam crest
Azam
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Azam presents impressive home form with 60% wins and 100% clean sheets at their own stadium, not losing a single match at home this season. The hosts dominate in terms of ball possession (59% vs 44%) and offensive efficiency, having a significantly higher xG coefficient (1.91 vs 0.95). Mtibwa Sugar has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their form on the road is very weak with a sequence of ldlddd and 83% of matches without scoring a goal. The difference in playing quality is also visible in the average goals scored per match: Azam 1.4 at home, while Mtibwa Sugar just 0.17 away. Taking all statistics into account, especially Azam's invincibility on their own turf and the guests' complete lack of away victories, I definitely favor the hosts to achieve a certain victory.

Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Azam played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 25 February 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Azam: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Azam scores 1.38 and concedes 0.25 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.87 and concedes 0.93. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Azam 25%, Mtibwa Sugar 47%. Over 2.5: Azam 13%, Mtibwa Sugar 33%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.60 vs 0.97. Azam: 10.0 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.6.

Match halves

Azam: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.50. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Azam: 31-45+ (4 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam presents impressive home form with 60% wins and 100% clean sheets at their own stadium, not losing a single match at home this season. The hosts dominate in terms of ball possession (59% vs 44%) and offensive efficiency, having a significantly higher xG coefficient (1.91 vs 0.95). Mtibwa Sugar has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their form on the road is very weak with a sequence of ldlddd and 83% of matches without scoring a goal. The difference in playing quality is also visible in the average goals scored per match: Azam 1.4 at home, while Mtibwa Sugar just 0.17 away. Taking all statistics into account, especially Azam's invincibility on their own turf and the guests' complete lack of away victories, I definitely favor the hosts to achieve a certain victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
AzamMtibwa Sugar
10Shots0
AzamMtibwa Sugar
9Shots on target0
AzamMtibwa Sugar
1.55xG0.13
AzamMtibwa Sugar
5Corners1
AzamMtibwa Sugar
38Dangerous attacks16
AzamMtibwa Sugar
-1Fouls-1
AzamMtibwa Sugar
-1Cards-1
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.87
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.25Goals conceded / match0.93
AzamMtibwa Sugar
50%Average possession34%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
2.63Shots on target / match1.47
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match3.6
AzamMtibwa Sugar
2.63Shots on target1.47
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13.8%Shot conversion24.1%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
50%Possession34%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
1.6xG for0.97
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.84xG against1.41
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
AzamMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)26%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.520.59

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 57% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Azam · 1.4 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Azam
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Mtibwa Sugar
WWDLL
Season result split
33% W40% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-2
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Azam · 0.87 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Azam is 272% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.25 goals / match - Azam · 0.93 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: more difficult

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 75% (6 of 8 matches).

11Goals scored (season)13
AzamMtibwa Sugar
2Goals conceded (season)14
AzamMtibwa Sugar
1.63Average goals in match1.8
AzamMtibwa Sugar
7Goals scored (last 5)6
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0Goals conceded (last 5)8
AzamMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal60%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
50%2 goals27%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13%3 goals0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

25%1 goal60%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%2 goals20%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals13%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time27%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
25%Scored in both halves20%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS - last 580%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 236% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.25 pts / match - Azam · 0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Azam - half-time state
63% leading38% draw0% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.25Points per match (1st half)0.67
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.27
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.93
AzamMtibwa Sugar
100%Clean sheet before half-time40%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
38%No goal before half-time73%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.53
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
AzamMtibwa Sugar
0.75Average goals (2nd half)0.73
AzamMtibwa Sugar
75%Clean sheet after half-time80%
AzamMtibwa Sugar
63%No goal after half-time53%
AzamMtibwa Sugar

Azam - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

33% W53% R13% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
4
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 1.631.89 1.80
Both teams scored 25%30% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%29% 33%
Clean sheets 75%42% 40%
Goal before half-time 63%51% 60%
Goal after half-time 63%56% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+86%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Faisal Salum⚽ 1 · A 1
Jean-Jacques Ngita⚽ 2
Lusajo MwaikendaA 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AzamGoalFaisal SalumAssist: Lusajo Mwaikenda
  2. AzamGoalJean-Jacques NgitaAssist: Faisal Salum
  3. AzamGoalJean-Jacques NgitaAssist: Lusajo Mwaikenda

FAQ

What was the result of Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 3:0 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Azam score 1.38 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.87. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Azam's matches and 47% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Azam and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Azam have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Azam vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.