Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraChamazi StadiumData current as of 18 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Azam vs Simba: match statistics

Azam vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Azam play Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Chamazi Stadium.

Current form

Azam: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Simba: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Azam scores 1.83 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Simba scores 1.80 and concedes 0.40. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Azam 67%, Simba 40%. Over 2.5: Azam 50%, Simba 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.71. Azam: 11.8 shots per match, Simba: 8.4.

Match halves

Azam: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67. Simba: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Azam: 16-30 (4 goals). Simba: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.8
AzamSimba
0.83Goals conceded / match0.4
AzamSimba
56%Average possession59%
AzamSimba
6.5Shots on target / match4
AzamSimba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.83Shots per match8.4
AzamSimba
6.5Shots on target4
AzamSimba
15.5%Shot conversion21.4%
AzamSimba
56%Possession59%
AzamSimba
1.9xG for1.71
AzamSimba
1.37xG against0.63
AzamSimba

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingSimba: Efficient finishing
AzamSimba
Accuracy (shots on target)55%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Simba is 15% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Azam · 3 pts / match - Simba

Azam
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.12Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Simba
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 away
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 107% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Azam · 0.4 goals / match - Simba

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Simba scoring profile: very strong

Simba scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

11Goals scored (season)9
AzamSimba
5Goals conceded (season)2
AzamSimba
2.67Average goals in match2.2
AzamSimba
10Goals scored (last 5)9
AzamSimba
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
AzamSimba

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
AzamSimba
83%2 goals80%
AzamSimba
0%3 goals0%
AzamSimba
0%4 goals0%
AzamSimba

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal40%
AzamSimba
17%2 goals0%
AzamSimba
0%3 goals0%
AzamSimba
0%4 goals0%
AzamSimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
AzamSimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AzamSimba
50%Scored in both halves60%
AzamSimba

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
AzamSimba
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AzamSimba
60%BTTS - last 540%
AzamSimba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
AzamSimba
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
AzamSimba
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AzamSimba

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AzamSimba
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AzamSimba
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AzamSimba

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / match - Azam · 2.2 pts / match - Simba

Azam - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
Simba - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per match (1st half)2.2
AzamSimba
1.17Goals scored (1st half)1
AzamSimba
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
AzamSimba
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.2
AzamSimba
83%Clean sheet before half-time80%
AzamSimba
17%No goal before half-time20%
AzamSimba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)2.4
AzamSimba
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
AzamSimba
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
AzamSimba
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1
AzamSimba
50%Clean sheet after half-time80%
AzamSimba
33%No goal after half-time20%
AzamSimba

Azam - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Simba - second-half results

80% W0% D20% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Simba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Simba
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
188%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
26%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaSimba
Average goals in match 2.672.48 2.20
Both teams scored 67%48% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%42% 40%
Clean sheets 33%27% 60%
Goal before half-time 83%75% 80%
Goal after half-time 83%71% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Azam 1 - 1 - 0 Simba. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.