Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Azam vs Young Africans: match statistics
Azam vs Young Africans: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Azam play Young Africans in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Current form
Azam: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Young Africans: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Azam scores 1.58 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Young Africans scores 2.50 and concedes 0.17. League average: 1.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Azam 25%, Young Africans 17%. Over 2.5: Azam 33%, Young Africans 50%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Young Africans has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.42. Azam: 8.8 shots per match, Young Africans: 7.6.
Match halves
Azam: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.67. Young Africans: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Azam: 0-15 (4 goals). Young Africans: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.77 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Young Africans is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Azam · 2.6 pts / match - Young Africans
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 58% better for: goals scored per match.
1.58 goals / match - Azam · 2.5 goals / match - Young Africans
Young Africans is 94% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.33 goals / match - Azam · 0.17 goals / match - Young Africans
Azam scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 83% (10 of 12 matches).
Young Africans scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 75% (9 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Azam
Over / Under - Young Africans
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.08 pts / match - Azam · 1.83 pts / match - Young Africans
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Azam
Young Africans
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.92 | 1.94 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 75% | 42% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.